Literature DB >> 27531119

Identifying barriers to hepatocellular carcinoma surveillance in a national sample of patients with cirrhosis.

David S Goldberg1,2, Tamar H Taddei3, Marina Serper1,4, Rajni Mehta3, Eric Dieperink5, Ayse Aytaman6, Michelle Baytarian7, Rena Fox8, Kristel Hunt9, Marcos Pedrosa7, Christine Pocha10, Adriana Valderrama11, David E Kaplan1,4.   

Abstract

Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is a leading cause of morbidity and mortality in cirrhosis patients. This provides an opportunity to target the highest-risk population, yet surveillance rates in the United States and Europe range from 10% to 40%. The goal of this study was to identify barriers to HCC surveillance, using data from the Veterans Health Administration, the largest provider of liver-related health care in the United States. We included all patients 75 years of age or younger who were diagnosed with cirrhosis from January 1, 2008, until December 31, 2010. The primary outcome was a continuous measure of the percentage of time up-to-date with HCC surveillance (PTUDS) based on abdominal ultrasound (secondary outcomes included computed tomography and magnetic resonance imaging). Among 26,577 patients with cirrhosis (median follow-up = 4.7 years), the mean PTUDS was 17.8 ± 21.5% (ultrasounds) and 23.3 ± 24.1% when any liver imaging modality was included. The strongest predictor of increased PTUDS was the number of visits to a specialist (gastroenterologist/hepatologist and/or infectious diseases) in the first year after cirrhosis diagnosis; the association between visits to a primary care physician and increasing surveillance was very small. Increasing distance to the closest Veterans Administration center was associated with decreased PTUDS. There was an inverse association between ultrasound lead time (difference between the date an ultrasound was ordered and requested exam date) and the odds of it being performed: odds ratio = 0.77, 95% confidence interval 0.72-0.82 when ordered > 180 days ahead of time; odds ratio = 0.90, 95% confidence interval 0.85-0.94 if lead time 91-180 days.
CONCLUSIONS: The responsibility for suboptimal surveillance rests with patients, providers, and the overall health care system; several measures can be implemented to potentially increase HCC surveillance, including increasing patient-specialist visits and minimizing appointment lead time. (Hepatology 2017;65:864-874).
© 2016 by the American Association for the Study of Liver Diseases.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27531119     DOI: 10.1002/hep.28765

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Hepatology        ISSN: 0270-9139            Impact factor:   17.425


  40 in total

1.  Effect of travel distance and rurality of residence on initial surveillance for hepatocellular carcinoma in VA primary care patient with cirrhosis.

Authors:  Yolanda Rodriguez Villalvazo; Jennifer S McDanel; Lauren A Beste; Antonio J Sanchez; Mary Vaughan-Sarrazin; David A Katz
Journal:  Health Serv Res       Date:  2019-11-25       Impact factor: 3.402

2.  Quality Measures, All-Cause Mortality, and Health Care Use in a National Cohort of Veterans With Cirrhosis.

Authors:  Marina Serper; David E Kaplan; Justine Shults; Peter P Reese; Lauren A Beste; Tamar H Taddei; Rachel M Werner
Journal:  Hepatology       Date:  2019-06-26       Impact factor: 17.425

3.  Risk prediction scores for acute on chronic liver failure development and mortality.

Authors:  Nadim Mahmud; Rebecca A Hubbard; David E Kaplan; Tamar H Taddei; David S Goldberg
Journal:  Liver Int       Date:  2019-12-26       Impact factor: 5.828

4.  Use of Appropriate Surveillance for Patients With Nondysplastic Barrett's Esophagus.

Authors:  Anna Tavakkoli; Henry D Appelman; David G Beer; Chaitra Madiyal; Maryam Khodadost; Kimberly Nofz; Val Metko; Grace Elta; Thomas Wang; Joel H Rubenstein
Journal:  Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol       Date:  2018-02-09       Impact factor: 11.382

5.  Differences in Pathology, Staging, and Treatment between HIV+ and Uninfected Patients with Microscopically Confirmed Hepatocellular Carcinoma.

Authors:  Jessie Torgersen; Tamar H Taddei; Lesley S Park; Dena M Carbonari; Michael J Kallan; Kisha Mitchell Richards; Xuchen Zhang; Darshana Jhala; Norbert Bräu; Robert Homer; Kathryn D'Addeo; Rajni Mehta; Melissa Skanderson; Farah Kidwai-Khan; Amy C Justice; Vincent Lo Re
Journal:  Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev       Date:  2019-10-01       Impact factor: 4.254

Review 6.  Screening for Hepatocellular Carcinoma in HIV-Infected Patients: Current Evidence and Controversies.

Authors:  N Merchante; M Rodríguez-Fernández; J A Pineda
Journal:  Curr HIV/AIDS Rep       Date:  2020-02       Impact factor: 5.071

7.  Cirrhosis Patients with Nonalcoholic Steatohepatitis Are Significantly Less Likely to Receive Surveillance for Hepatocellular Carcinoma.

Authors:  Hesam Tavakoli; Ann Robinson; Benny Liu; Taft Bhuket; Zobair Younossi; Sammy Saab; Aijaz Ahmed; Robert J Wong
Journal:  Dig Dis Sci       Date:  2017-05-04       Impact factor: 3.199

8.  Primary Care Provider Practice Patterns and Barriers to Hepatocellular Carcinoma Surveillance.

Authors:  Okeefe L Simmons; Yuan Feng; Neehar D Parikh; Amit G Singal
Journal:  Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol       Date:  2018-07-26       Impact factor: 11.382

9.  Incidence and Mortality of Acute-on-Chronic Liver Failure Using Two Definitions in Patients with Compensated Cirrhosis.

Authors:  Nadim Mahmud; David E Kaplan; Tamar H Taddei; David S Goldberg
Journal:  Hepatology       Date:  2019-03-20       Impact factor: 17.425

Review 10.  Does Hepatocellular Carcinoma Surveillance Increase Survival in At-Risk Populations? Patient Selection, Biomarkers, and Barriers.

Authors:  Lisa X Deng; Neil Mehta
Journal:  Dig Dis Sci       Date:  2020-12       Impact factor: 3.199

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.