Literature DB >> 31107967

Quality Measures, All-Cause Mortality, and Health Care Use in a National Cohort of Veterans With Cirrhosis.

Marina Serper1,2,3, David E Kaplan1,2, Justine Shults4, Peter P Reese3,4,5, Lauren A Beste6,7,8, Tamar H Taddei9,10, Rachel M Werner1,3,11.   

Abstract

Decompensated cirrhosis is associated with high morbidity and mortality. However, no standardized quality measures (QMs) have yet been adopted widely. The Veterans Affairs (VA) Advanced Liver Disease Technical Advisory Group recently developed a set of six internal QMs to guide quality improvement efforts in cirrhosis in the domains of access to care, hepatocellular carcinoma surveillance, variceal surveillance, quality of inpatient care for upper gastrointestinal bleeding, and cirrhosis-related rehospitalizations. We aimed to (1) quantify adherence to cirrhosis QMs and (2) determine whether adherence was associated with all-cause mortality and health care use within a large national cohort of veterans with cirrhosis. We performed a retrospective study using data from the Veterans Outcomes and Costs Asociated with Liver Disease cohort of 121,129 patients newly diagnosed with cirrhosis from January 1, 2008, to December 31, 2016, at 128 VA facilities. The mean follow-up time was 2.7 years (interquartile range, 1.1-5.1 years). Adherence to outpatient access to specialty care was 71%, variceal surveillance was 32%, and early postdischarge care was 54%. In adjusted analyses, outpatient access to specialty care (hazard ratio [HR], 0.80; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.78-0.82), hepatocellular carcinoma surveillance (HR, 0.92; 95% CI, 0.90-0.95), variceal surveillance (HR, 0.93; 95% CI, 0.89-0.99), and early postdischarge care (HR, 0.57; 95% CI, 0.54-0.60) were associated with lower all-cause mortality. Readmissions after 30 days (HR, 1.53; 1.46-1.60) and 90 days (HR, 1.88; 95% CI, 1.54-1.70) were associated with higher all-cause mortality. Higher adherence to QMs was also associated with lower inpatient health care use.
Conclusion: Five of the six proposed VA cirrhosis QMs were measurable using existing data sources, associated with mortality and health care use, and may be used to guide future quality improvement efforts in cirrhosis.
© 2019 by the American Association for the Study of Liver Diseases.

Entities:  

Year:  2019        PMID: 31107967      PMCID: PMC6864236          DOI: 10.1002/hep.30779

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Hepatology        ISSN: 0270-9139            Impact factor:   17.425


  36 in total

1.  Burden of liver disease in the United States: summary of a workshop.

Authors:  W Ray Kim; Robert S Brown; Norah A Terrault; Hashem El-Serag
Journal:  Hepatology       Date:  2002-07       Impact factor: 17.425

2.  The quality of care provided to patients with varices in the department of Veterans Affairs.

Authors:  Paula M Buchanan; Jennifer R Kramer; Hashem B El-Serag; Steven M Asch; Youssef Assioun; Bruce R Bacon; Fasiha Kanwal
Journal:  Am J Gastroenterol       Date:  2014-07       Impact factor: 10.864

Review 3.  Multidisciplinary management of patients with cirrhosis: a need for care coordination.

Authors:  Jessica L Mellinger; Michael L Volk
Journal:  Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol       Date:  2012-11-06       Impact factor: 11.382

4.  Variation among United States hospitals in inpatient mortality for cirrhosis.

Authors:  Jessica L Mellinger; Caroline R Richardson; Amit K Mathur; Michael L Volk
Journal:  Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol       Date:  2014-09-28       Impact factor: 11.382

5.  The current economic burden of cirrhosis.

Authors:  Guy W Neff; Christopher W Duncan; Eugene R Schiff
Journal:  Gastroenterol Hepatol (N Y)       Date:  2011-10

6.  Implementation of a Population-Based Cirrhosis Identification and Management System.

Authors:  Fasiha Kanwal; Srikar Mapaskhi; Donna Smith; Tamar Taddei; Khozema Hussain; Stella Madu; Ngoc Duong; Donna White; Yumei Cao; Rajni Mehta; Hashem El-Serag; Steven Asch; Amanda Midboe
Journal:  Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol       Date:  2018-05-24       Impact factor: 11.382

7.  The AUDIT alcohol consumption questions (AUDIT-C): an effective brief screening test for problem drinking. Ambulatory Care Quality Improvement Project (ACQUIP). Alcohol Use Disorders Identification Test.

Authors:  K Bush; D R Kivlahan; M B McDonell; S D Fihn; K A Bradley
Journal:  Arch Intern Med       Date:  1998-09-14

Review 8.  A model to predict survival in patients with end-stage liver disease.

Authors:  P S Kamath; R H Wiesner; M Malinchoc; W Kremers; T M Therneau; C L Kosberg; G D'Amico; E R Dickson; W R Kim
Journal:  Hepatology       Date:  2001-02       Impact factor: 17.425

9.  Trends in burden of cirrhosis and hepatocellular carcinoma by underlying liver disease in US veterans, 2001-2013.

Authors:  Lauren A Beste; Steven L Leipertz; Pamela K Green; Jason A Dominitz; David Ross; George N Ioannou
Journal:  Gastroenterology       Date:  2015-08-05       Impact factor: 22.682

10.  Early detection, curative treatment, and survival rates for hepatocellular carcinoma surveillance in patients with cirrhosis: a meta-analysis.

Authors:  Amit G Singal; Anjana Pillai; Jasmin Tiro
Journal:  PLoS Med       Date:  2014-04-01       Impact factor: 11.069

View more
  12 in total

1.  Adherence to quality indicators and hospital outcomes for patients with decompensated cirrhosis: An observational study.

Authors:  Krista R Wooller; Dominique Yelle; Stacy Fisher; Ian Carrigan; Erin Kelly
Journal:  Can Liver J       Date:  2020-11-17

2.  Mortality and Hepatic Decompensation in Patients With Cirrhosis and Atrial Fibrillation Treated With Anticoagulation.

Authors:  Marina Serper; Ethan M Weinberg; Jordana B Cohen; Peter P Reese; Tamar H Taddei; David E Kaplan
Journal:  Hepatology       Date:  2020-11-09       Impact factor: 17.425

3.  Hooray for the VHA! A Survey of Access and Barriers to Liver Care Among Veterans.

Authors:  Brian C Davis; HoChong Gilles; Michael Fuchs
Journal:  Dig Dis Sci       Date:  2019-12       Impact factor: 3.199

Review 4.  The Future of Quality Improvement for Cirrhosis.

Authors:  Elliot B Tapper; Neehar D Parikh
Journal:  Liver Transpl       Date:  2021-07-31       Impact factor: 6.112

5.  Non-invasive diagnosis of variceal bleeding: choose the right target population and identify the right culprit.

Authors:  Paul Calès; Alice Nanelin Guingané; Frédéric Oberti; Roger Arsène Sombié
Journal:  Ann Transl Med       Date:  2020-06

6.  A Telephone and Mail Outreach Program Successfully Increases Uptake of Hepatocellular Carcinoma Surveillance.

Authors:  Elizabeth S Aby; Adam C Winters; Jonathan Lin; Aileen Bui; Jenna Kawamoto; Matthew B Goetz; Debika Bhattacharya; Joseph R Pisegna; Folasade P May; Arpan A Patel; Jihane N Benhammou
Journal:  Hepatol Commun       Date:  2020-04-24

7.  Telemedicine in Liver Disease and Beyond: Can the COVID-19 Crisis Lead to Action?

Authors:  Marina Serper; Allen W Cubell; Mary Elisabeth Deleener; Tara K Casher; Dale J Rosenberg; Dale Whitebloom; Roy M Rosin
Journal:  Hepatology       Date:  2020-08       Impact factor: 17.425

8.  Moving Toward Impact: An Introduction to Implementation Science for Gastroenterologists and Hepatologists.

Authors:  Shari S Rogal; Byron J Powell; Matthew Chinman
Journal:  Gastroenterology       Date:  2020-09-18       Impact factor: 22.682

Review 9.  The COVID-19 pandemic will have a long-lasting impact on the quality of cirrhosis care.

Authors:  Elliot B Tapper; Sumeet K Asrani
Journal:  J Hepatol       Date:  2020-04-13       Impact factor: 25.083

10.  The Predictive Role of Model for End-Stage Liver Disease-Lactate and Lactate Clearance for In-Hospital Mortality Among a National Cirrhosis Cohort.

Authors:  Nadim Mahmud; Sumeet K Asrani; David E Kaplan; Gerald O Ogola; Tamar H Taddei; Patrick S Kamath; Marina Serper
Journal:  Liver Transpl       Date:  2020-12-09       Impact factor: 5.799

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.