Literature DB >> 27530822

Increasing Urologic Care Ratios: Implications of Male Patient Care in Florida.

Walker Talton1, Hanna Lindner2, Michael J Rovito3.   

Abstract

Ongoing trends have revealed an inverse relationship between population growth and the number of practicing urologists in the U.S. per capita, which threatens urologic care accessibility. Furthermore, different regions in the United States may be more negatively impacted due to higher population growth rates. The state of Florida witnessed over a 10% higher growth rate compared with national figures between 2000 and 2015. Coupled with data suggesting that since the 1980s, the number of U.S. urologists per capita has been decreasing, the foreseeable future presents many challenges regarding health equity and accessibility. This secondary analysis aimed to investigate the implications of forecasted urologic care decline within a growing population and how it can contribute to adverse male health outcomes. National- and state-level data were collected to calculate a series of urologic care ratios as defined by the number of urologists compared with population sizes. Analyses revealed that national-level urologic care ratios and prostate cancer incidence rates have a significant positive relationship, lending to the conclusion that with fewer urologists, the number of cases identified will decrease. State-level forecasted models indicated that the urologic care ratio will decrease approximately 30% in Florida from 6.23 per 100,000 in 2010 to 4.39 per 100,000 by the year 2030. As growth in demand for urologic care will increase in the next decade, a dire public health scenario is potentially unfolding. Future implications of undiagnosed prostate cancer due to the lack of access will drive an increase in mortality rates as well as health equity concerns for men.

Entities:  

Keywords:  access to care; general health and wellness; health care utilization; health related quality of life; prostate cancer

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27530822      PMCID: PMC6199425          DOI: 10.1177/1557988316664904

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Mens Health        ISSN: 1557-9883


  24 in total

1.  The continued decline of formal urological education of medical students in the United States: does it matter?

Authors:  B Price Kerfoot; Barbara A Masser; William C Dewolf
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2006-06       Impact factor: 7.450

2.  Does urological cancer mortality increase with low population density of physicians?

Authors:  Janet Colli; Oliver Sartor; Raju Thomas; Benjamin R Lee
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2011-10-20       Impact factor: 7.450

3.  Burnout and satisfaction with work-life balance among US physicians relative to the general US population.

Authors:  Tait D Shanafelt; Sonja Boone; Litjen Tan; Lotte N Dyrbye; Wayne Sotile; Daniel Satele; Colin P West; Jeff Sloan; Michael R Oreskovich
Journal:  Arch Intern Med       Date:  2012-10-08

4.  Effect of bothersome overactive bladder symptoms on health-related quality of life, anxiety, depression, and treatment seeking in the United States: results from EpiLUTS.

Authors:  Ian Milsom; Steven A Kaplan; Karin S Coyne; Chris C Sexton; Zoe S Kopp
Journal:  Urology       Date:  2012-07       Impact factor: 2.649

5.  Longitudinal Study Evaluating the Association Between Physician Burnout and Changes in Professional Work Effort.

Authors:  Tait D Shanafelt; Michelle Mungo; Jaime Schmitgen; Kristin A Storz; David Reeves; Sharonne N Hayes; Jeff A Sloan; Stephen J Swensen; Steven J Buskirk
Journal:  Mayo Clin Proc       Date:  2016-04       Impact factor: 7.616

6.  The decline of urological education in United States medical schools.

Authors:  G S Benson
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  1994-07       Impact factor: 7.450

7.  Urologist density and county-level urologic cancer mortality.

Authors:  Anobel Y Odisho; Matthew R Cooperberg; Vincent Fradet; Ardalan E Ahmad; Peter R Carroll
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2010-04-20       Impact factor: 44.544

8.  Prostate cancer in men age 50 years or younger: a review of the Department of Defense Center for Prostate Disease Research multicenter prostate cancer database.

Authors:  C V Smith; J J Bauer; R R Connelly; T Seay; C Kane; J Foley; J B Thrasher; L Kusuda; J W Moul
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2000-12       Impact factor: 7.450

9.  Impact of county rurality and urologist density on urological cancer mortality in illinois.

Authors:  Thomas P Frye; Daniel J Sadowski; Whitney E Zahnd; Wiley D Jenkins; Danuta I Dynda; Georgia S Mueller; Shaheen R Alanee; Kevin T McVary
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2014-12-10       Impact factor: 7.450

10.  Estimating a reasonable patient panel size for primary care physicians with team-based task delegation.

Authors:  Justin Altschuler; David Margolius; Thomas Bodenheimer; Kevin Grumbach
Journal:  Ann Fam Med       Date:  2012 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 5.166

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.