Literature DB >> 22014823

Does urological cancer mortality increase with low population density of physicians?

Janet Colli1, Oliver Sartor, Raju Thomas, Benjamin R Lee.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: We examined the association between urological cancer mortality rates and the presence of physicians. We hypothesized that cancer mortality rates increase with a low physician population density since this would decrease the detection of cancers at an early stage.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Mortality rates for prostate cancer, bladder cancer, kidney and renal pelvis cancer, and cancer at all sites for white patients in United States counties from 2003 to 2007 were obtained from the National Vital Statistics System. High and low rate groups of counties were reviewed for each type of cancer. The high rate groups consisted of 15 or 25 counties with the highest cancer mortality rates. The low rate groups consisted of counties, selected from the same states as high rate groups, with the lowest mortality rates. Levels of physicians per 10,000 general population, income, poverty and no health insurance were compared between the high and low cancer rate groups.
RESULTS: There was a statistically significant inverse association between physician population density levels and kidney and renal pelvis cancer mortality rates. The association was suggestive for bladder cancer and prostate cancer mortality but not for cancer at all sites. There was also a tendency for an inverse association between family income and cancer mortality rates.
CONCLUSIONS: Kidney and renal pelvis cancer mortality rates increased significantly with a low physician population density. We found a suggestive but not significant negative association between physician population density and mortality rates for prostate cancer and bladder cancer but not for cancer at all sites. Low family income was associated with higher cancer rates. Copyright Â
© 2011 American Urological Association Education and Research, Inc. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 22014823     DOI: 10.1016/j.juro.2011.07.069

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Urol        ISSN: 0022-5347            Impact factor:   7.450


  4 in total

1.  Increasing Urologic Care Ratios: Implications of Male Patient Care in Florida.

Authors:  Walker Talton; Hanna Lindner; Michael J Rovito
Journal:  Am J Mens Health       Date:  2016-08-15

2.  Under Treatment of Prostate Cancer in Rural Locations.

Authors:  Avinash Maganty; Lindsay M Sabik; ZhaoJun Sun; Kirsten Y Eom; Jie Li; Benjamin J Davies; Bruce L Jacobs
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2019-08-20       Impact factor: 7.450

3.  Urban sprawl, obesity, and cancer mortality in the United States: cross-sectional analysis and methodological challenges.

Authors:  David Berrigan; Zaria Tatalovich; Linda W Pickle; Reid Ewing; Rachel Ballard-Barbash
Journal:  Int J Health Geogr       Date:  2014-01-06       Impact factor: 3.918

4.  Does uneven geographic distribution of urologists effect bladder and prostate cancers mortality? National health insurance data in Korea from 2007-2011.

Authors:  Jae Heon Kim; Hwa Yeon Sun; Hyun Jung Kim; Young Myoung Ko; Dong-Il Chun; Jae Young Park
Journal:  Oncotarget       Date:  2017-05-20
  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.