Literature DB >> 27529804

Sparse modeling of EELS and EDX spectral imaging data by nonnegative matrix factorization.

Motoki Shiga1, Kazuyoshi Tatsumi2, Shunsuke Muto2, Koji Tsuda3, Yuta Yamamoto4, Toshiyuki Mori5, Takayoshi Tanji6.   

Abstract

Advances in scanning transmission electron microscopy (STEM) techniques have enabled us to automatically obtain electron energy-loss (EELS)/energy-dispersive X-ray (EDX) spectral datasets from a specified region of interest (ROI) at an arbitrary step width, called spectral imaging (SI). Instead of manually identifying the potential constituent chemical components from the ROI and determining the chemical state of each spectral component from the SI data stored in a huge three-dimensional matrix, it is more effective and efficient to use a statistical approach for the automatic resolution and extraction of the underlying chemical components. Among many different statistical approaches, we adopt a non-negative matrix factorization (NMF) technique, mainly because of the natural assumption of non-negative values in the spectra and cardinalities of chemical components, which are always positive in actual data. This paper proposes a new NMF model with two penalty terms: (i) an automatic relevance determination (ARD) prior, which optimizes the number of components, and (ii) a soft orthogonal constraint, which clearly resolves each spectrum component. For the factorization, we further propose a fast optimization algorithm based on hierarchical alternating least-squares. Numerical experiments using both phantom and real STEM-EDX/EELS SI datasets demonstrate that the ARD prior successfully identifies the correct number of physically meaningful components. The soft orthogonal constraint is also shown to be effective, particularly for STEM-EELS SI data, where neither the spatial nor spectral entries in the matrices are sparse.
Copyright © 2016 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Keywords:  Automatic relevance determination; Nonnegative matrix factorization; Sparse modeling; Spatial orthogonality; Spectral imaging

Year:  2016        PMID: 27529804     DOI: 10.1016/j.ultramic.2016.08.006

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ultramicroscopy        ISSN: 0304-3991            Impact factor:   2.689


  8 in total

1.  Application of machine learning techniques to electron microscopic/spectroscopic image data analysis.

Authors:  Shunsuke Muto; Motoki Shiga
Journal:  Microscopy (Oxf)       Date:  2020-04-08       Impact factor: 1.571

2.  Perovskite-organic tandem solar cells with indium oxide interconnect.

Authors:  K O Brinkmann; T Becker; F Zimmermann; C Kreusel; T Gahlmann; M Theisen; T Haeger; S Olthof; C Tückmantel; M Günster; T Maschwitz; F Göbelsmann; C Koch; D Hertel; P Caprioglio; F Peña-Camargo; L Perdigón-Toro; A Al-Ashouri; L Merten; A Hinderhofer; L Gomell; S Zhang; F Schreiber; S Albrecht; K Meerholz; D Neher; M Stolterfoht; T Riedl
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2022-04-13       Impact factor: 49.962

3.  Evaluation of EELS spectrum imaging data by spectral components and factors from multivariate analysis.

Authors:  Siyuan Zhang; Christina Scheu
Journal:  Microscopy (Oxf)       Date:  2018-03-01       Impact factor: 1.571

4.  Data-driven approach for the prediction and interpretation of core-electron loss spectroscopy.

Authors:  Shin Kiyohara; Tomohiro Miyata; Koji Tsuda; Teruyasu Mizoguchi
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2018-09-06       Impact factor: 4.379

5.  Synthesis and characterization of Mono-disperse Carbon Quantum Dots from Fennel Seeds: Photoluminescence analysis using Machine Learning.

Authors:  Akansha Dager; Takashi Uchida; Toru Maekawa; Masaru Tachibana
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2019-09-30       Impact factor: 4.379

Review 6.  Deep data analysis via physically constrained linear unmixing: universal framework, domain examples, and a community-wide platform.

Authors:  R Kannan; A V Ievlev; N Laanait; M A Ziatdinov; R K Vasudevan; S Jesse; S V Kalinin
Journal:  Adv Struct Chem Imaging       Date:  2018-04-30

7.  Machine Learning based Analytical Framework for Automatic Hyperspectral Raman Analysis of Lithium-ion Battery Electrodes.

Authors:  Ankur Baliyan; Hideto Imai
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2019-12-03       Impact factor: 4.379

8.  Unmixing noisy co-registered spectrum images of multicomponent nanostructures.

Authors:  Nadi Braidy; Ryan Gosselin
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2019-12-11       Impact factor: 4.379

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.