Literature DB >> 27529396

Threshold tracking primary motor cortex inhibition: the influence of current direction.

John Cirillo1, Winston D Byblow2.   

Abstract

Paired-pulse transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) can be used to probe inhibitory activity in primary motor cortex (M1). Recruitment of descending volleys with TMS depends on the induced current direction in M1. Anterior-posterior (AP) stimulation preferentially activates late indirect- (I-) waves that are most susceptible to paired-pulse TMS. Threshold tracking TMS can assess intracortical inhibition; however, previous studies have only used a current direction that preferentially recruits early I-waves [posterior-anterior (PA)]. Our objective was to examine intracortical inhibition with threshold tracking TMS designed to preferentially recruit early vs. late I-waves with PA and AP stimulation respectively. Electromyographic recordings were obtained from the right first dorsal interosseous muscle of 15 participants (21-50 years). Motor evoked potentials elicited by TMS over left M1 were recorded for PA, AP and lateromedial (LM) induced currents, with I-wave recruitment calculated as the onset latency difference between PA-LM and AP-LM. Short- and long-interval intracortical inhibition (SICI and LICI) were examined across a range of conditioning stimulus intensities and interstimulus intervals (3 and 100-260 ms) with threshold tracking TMS for PA and AP stimulation. SICI and LICI were greater for AP compared with PA current direction using threshold tracking. In addition, the efficacy of late I-wave recruitment was associated with the extent of SICI for AP but not PA stimulation, and was not associated with LICI. These findings indicate that threshold tracking with an AP-induced current provides a more robust and sensitive measure of M1 intracortical inhibition than PA.
© 2016 Federation of European Neuroscience Societies and John Wiley & Sons Ltd.

Entities:  

Keywords:  I-waves; current direction; intracortical inhibition; threshold tracking; transcranial magnetic stimulation

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27529396     DOI: 10.1111/ejn.13369

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur J Neurosci        ISSN: 0953-816X            Impact factor:   3.386


  8 in total

1.  GABA and primary motor cortex inhibition in young and older adults: a multimodal reliability study.

Authors:  Ronan A Mooney; John Cirillo; Winston D Byblow
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2017-04-19       Impact factor: 2.714

2.  Age-related changes in late I-waves influence motor cortex plasticity induction in older adults.

Authors:  George M Opie; John Cirillo; John G Semmler
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  2018-05-23       Impact factor: 5.182

3.  Assessment of cortical inhibition depends on inter individual differences in the excitatory neural populations activated by transcranial magnetic stimulation.

Authors:  Andris Cerins; Daniel Corp; George Opie; Michael Do; Bridgette Speranza; Jason He; Pamela Barhoun; Ian Fuelscher; Peter Enticott; Christian Hyde
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2022-06-15       Impact factor: 4.996

4.  Mental practice modulates functional connectivity between the cerebellum and the primary motor cortex.

Authors:  Dylan Rannaud Monany; Florent Lebon; William Dupont; Charalambos Papaxanthis
Journal:  iScience       Date:  2022-05-13

5.  Primary motor cortex function and motor skill acquisition: insights from threshold-hunting TMS.

Authors:  John Cirillo; John G Semmler; Ronan A Mooney; Winston D Byblow
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2020-03-28       Impact factor: 1.972

6.  Adaptive threshold hunting for the effects of transcranial direct current stimulation on primary motor cortex inhibition.

Authors:  Ronan A Mooney; John Cirillo; Winston D Byblow
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2018-04-02       Impact factor: 1.972

7.  Short-interval intracortical inhibition: Comparison between conventional and threshold-tracking techniques.

Authors:  Gintaute Samusyte; Hugh Bostock; John Rothwell; Martin Koltzenburg
Journal:  Brain Stimul       Date:  2018-03-06       Impact factor: 8.955

Review 8.  Dissecting two distinct interneuronal networks in M1 with transcranial magnetic stimulation.

Authors:  Danny Spampinato
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2020-07-13       Impact factor: 1.972

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.