| Literature DB >> 27527221 |
Cornelia Blume1, Jonathan David2, Rachel E Bell3,4, Jay R Laver5, Robert C Read6,7,8, Graeme C Clark9, Donna E Davies10,11,12, Emily J Swindle13,14,15.
Abstract
The bronchial epithelium provides protection against pathogens from the inhaled environment through the formation of a highly-regulated barrier. In order to understand the pulmonary diseases melioidosis and tularemia caused by Burkholderia thailandensis and Fransicella tularensis, respectively, the barrier function of the human bronchial epithelium were analysed. Polarised 16HBE14o- or differentiated primary human bronchial epithelial cells (BECs) were exposed to increasing multiplicities of infection (MOI) of B. thailandensis or F. tularensis Live Vaccine Strain and barrier responses monitored over 24-72 h. Challenge of polarized BECs with either bacterial species caused an MOI- and time-dependent increase in ionic permeability, disruption of tight junctions, and bacterial passage from the apical to the basolateral compartment. B. thailandensis was found to be more invasive than F. tularensis. Both bacterial species induced an MOI-dependent increase in TNF-α release. An increase in ionic permeability and TNF-α release was induced by B. thailandensis in differentiated BECs. Pretreatment of polarised BECs with the corticosteroid fluticasone propionate reduced bacterial-dependent increases in ionic permeability, bacterial passage, and TNF-α release. TNF blocking antibody Enbrel(®) reduced bacterial passage only. BEC barrier properties are disrupted during respiratory bacterial infections and targeting with corticosteroids or anti-TNF compounds may represent a therapeutic option.Entities:
Keywords: Burkholderia thailandensis; Fransicella tularensis; airway epithelium; bacterial infection; bacterial passage; barrier functions; fluticasone propionate
Year: 2016 PMID: 27527221 PMCID: PMC5039433 DOI: 10.3390/pathogens5030053
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Pathogens ISSN: 2076-0817
Figure 1B. thailandensis and F. tularensis LVS disrupt the physical barrier properties of bronchial epithelial cells. Polarised 16HBE cells were infected apically with a bacterial suspension of indicated multiplicity of infection (MOI) and the ionic permeability determined by measuring transepithelial resistance (TER). (A) Infection of polarised 16HBE cells with B. thailandensis (MOI from 10−3 to 102). TER was measured after 6 h and 24 h of infection; (B) Polarised 16HBEs were infected with F. tularensis (MOI from 1 to 100). TER was analysed 24 h, 48 h and 72 h after infection. Results are normalised to t = 0 h after subtraction of the background TER of an empty transwell. Means ± SEM, n = 3–14 (A) and n = 3 (B). * p ≤ 0.05 compared to control.
Figure 2Disruption of tight junctions in bronchial epithelial cells after F. tularensis infection. Polarised 16HBE cells were apically infected with F. tularensis LVS (MOI of 1) for 72 h and distribution of the tight junction protein occludin (green) analysed by confocal fluorescence microscopy. Nuclei stained with DAPI were shown in pseudo-colouring (red) representative image of three independent experiments.
Figure 3Passage of bacteria across the epithelial barrier. Polarised 16HBE cells were apically infected with bacteria and the number of bacteria crossing the epithelial barrier assessed by counting live bacteria in the basolateral compartment. (A) Passage of B. thailandensis across the epithelial barrier after 24 h of infection; and (B) epithelial passage of F. tularensis LVS after 72 h of infection. Results are means ± SEM, n = 3.
Figure 4B. thailandensis and F. tularensis infection of airway epithelial cells activated the immunological barrier functions. Polarised 16HBE cells were apically infected with B. thailandensis or F. tularensis and the basolateral release of inflammatory mediators was analysed. Basolateral release of TNF-α after 24 h of infection with B. thailandensis by analysed by ELISA (A) and, after 72 h of F. tularensis LVS infection, by CBA assay (B) normalised to untreated control (A: untreated control: 85.3 ± 45.4 pg/mL; B: 2.4 ± 1.2 pg/mL). Results are means ± SEM, n = 3–6 (A) and n = 3 (B). * p ≤ 0.05 compared to control; and (C) correlation of TNF-α release with ionic permeability determined by measuring transepithelial resistance (TER).
Figure 5Differentiated PBECs are more sensitive to infection with B. thailandensis. After apical infection of differentiated PBECs with B. thailandensis, physical and immunological barrier properties were monitored. (A) Ionic barrier permeability was measured by TER after 6 h and 24 h of infection and normalised to t = 0 h after subtraction of the background TER of an empty TW; (B) basolateral release of TNF-α after 24 h of infection was analysed by ELISA; and (C) correlation of TNF-α release with ionic permeability determined by measuring the transepithelial resistance (TER). Results are means ± SEM, n = 3–6 (A) and n = 4–6 (B). * p ≤ 0.05 compared to control.
Figure 6Corticosteroids and anti-TNF-α treatment alter epithelial barrier functions during B. thailandensis infection. Polarised 16HBEs were pre-treated with 10 nM fluticasone propionate (FP) or 10 μg/mL anti-TNF-α (Enbrel®) for 1 h before apical infection with B. thailandensis for 24 h. (A) Physical barrier properties measured by TER are normalised to t = 0 h; (B) passage of bacteria across the epithelial barrier are determined by bacterial counts in the basolateral medium; and (C) basolateral release of TNF-α measured by ELISA. Results are means ± SEM, n = 5. * p ≤ 0.05.