OBJECTIVES: Cognitive screening is recommended in stroke, but test completion may be complicated by stroke related impairments. We described feasibility of completion of three commonly used cognitive screening tools and the effect on scoring properties when cognitive testing was entirely/partially incomplete. METHODS: We performed a cross-sectional study, recruiting sequential stroke patient admissions from two University Hospital stroke rehabilitation services. We assessed Folstein's mini-mental state examination (MMSE), Montreal cognitive assessment (MoCA) and Addenbrooke's cognitive examination (ACE-III). The multidisciplinary team gave an independent diagnostic formulation. We recorded numbers fully/partially completing tests, assistance and time required for testing. We calculated test discrimination metrics in relation to clinical assessment using four differing statistical approaches to account for incomplete testing. RESULTS: We recruited 51 patients. Direct assistance to complete cognitive tests was required for 33 (63%). At traditional cut-offs, the majority screened "positive" for cognitive impairment (ACE-III: 98%; MoCA: 98%; MMSE: 81%). Comparing against a clinical diagnosis, ACE-III and MoCA had excellent sensitivity but poor specificity. Partial completion of cognitive tests was common (ACE-III: 14/51, MMSE: 22/51; MoCA: 20/51 fully complete); greatest non completion was for test items that required copying or drawing. Adapting analyses to account for these missing data gave differing results; MMSE sensitivity ranged from 0.66 to 0.85, and specificity ranged from 0.44 to 0.71 depending on the approach employed. CONCLUSIONS: For cognitive screening in stroke, even relatively brief tools are associated with substantial incompletion. The way these missing data are accounted for in analyses impacts on apparent test properties. When choosing a cognitive screening tool, feasibility should be considered and approaches to handling missing data made explicit.
OBJECTIVES: Cognitive screening is recommended in stroke, but test completion may be complicated by stroke related impairments. We described feasibility of completion of three commonly used cognitive screening tools and the effect on scoring properties when cognitive testing was entirely/partially incomplete. METHODS: We performed a cross-sectional study, recruiting sequential strokepatient admissions from two University Hospital stroke rehabilitation services. We assessed Folstein's mini-mental state examination (MMSE), Montreal cognitive assessment (MoCA) and Addenbrooke's cognitive examination (ACE-III). The multidisciplinary team gave an independent diagnostic formulation. We recorded numbers fully/partially completing tests, assistance and time required for testing. We calculated test discrimination metrics in relation to clinical assessment using four differing statistical approaches to account for incomplete testing. RESULTS: We recruited 51 patients. Direct assistance to complete cognitive tests was required for 33 (63%). At traditional cut-offs, the majority screened "positive" for cognitive impairment (ACE-III: 98%; MoCA: 98%; MMSE: 81%). Comparing against a clinical diagnosis, ACE-III and MoCA had excellent sensitivity but poor specificity. Partial completion of cognitive tests was common (ACE-III: 14/51, MMSE: 22/51; MoCA: 20/51 fully complete); greatest non completion was for test items that required copying or drawing. Adapting analyses to account for these missing data gave differing results; MMSE sensitivity ranged from 0.66 to 0.85, and specificity ranged from 0.44 to 0.71 depending on the approach employed. CONCLUSIONS: For cognitive screening in stroke, even relatively brief tools are associated with substantial incompletion. The way these missing data are accounted for in analyses impacts on apparent test properties. When choosing a cognitive screening tool, feasibility should be considered and approaches to handling missing data made explicit.
Authors: Terence J Quinn; Edo Richard; Yvonne Teuschl; Thomas Gattringer; Melanie Hafdi; John T O'Brien; Niamh Merriman; Celine Gillebert; Hanne Huyglier; Ana Verdelho; Reinhold Schmidt; Emma Ghaziani; Hysse Forchammer; Sarah T Pendlebury; Rose Bruffaerts; Milija Mijajlovic; Bogna A Drozdowska; Emily Ball; Hugh S Markus Journal: Eur Stroke J Date: 2021-10-08
Authors: Stephen Dj Makin; Fergus N Doubal; Kirsten Shuler; Francesca M Chappell; Julie Staals; Martin S Dennis; Joanna M Wardlaw Journal: Eur Stroke J Date: 2018-01-08
Authors: Joanna M Wardlaw; Fergus Doubal; Rosalind Brown; Ellen Backhouse; Lisa Woodhouse; Philip Bath; Terence J Quinn; Thompson Robinson; Hugh S Markus; Richard McManus; John T O'Brien; David J Werring; Nikola Sprigg; Adrian Parry-Jones; Rhian M Touyz; Steven Williams; Yee-Haur Mah; Hedley Emsley Journal: Eur Stroke J Date: 2020-10-11
Authors: Lucy C Beishon; Angus P Batterham; Terry J Quinn; Christopher P Nelson; Ronney B Panerai; Thompson Robinson; Victoria J Haunton Journal: Cochrane Database Syst Rev Date: 2019-12-17
Authors: Kirsty Hendry; Claire Green; Rupert McShane; Anna H Noel-Storr; David J Stott; Sumayya Anwer; Alex J Sutton; Jennifer K Burton; Terry J Quinn Journal: Cochrane Database Syst Rev Date: 2019-03-04
Authors: Milija D Mijajlović; Aleksandra Pavlović; Michael Brainin; Wolf-Dieter Heiss; Terence J Quinn; Hege B Ihle-Hansen; Dirk M Hermann; Einor Ben Assayag; Edo Richard; Alexander Thiel; Efrat Kliper; Yong-Il Shin; Yun-Hee Kim; SeongHye Choi; San Jung; Yeong-Bae Lee; Osman Sinanović; Deborah A Levine; Ilana Schlesinger; Gillian Mead; Vuk Milošević; Didier Leys; Guri Hagberg; Marie Helene Ursin; Yvonne Teuschl; Semyon Prokopenko; Elena Mozheyko; Anna Bezdenezhnykh; Karl Matz; Vuk Aleksić; DafinFior Muresanu; Amos D Korczyn; Natan M Bornstein Journal: BMC Med Date: 2017-01-18 Impact factor: 8.775
Authors: Calvin Ch Chan; Bruce A Fage; Jennifer K Burton; Nadja Smailagic; Sudeep S Gill; Nathan Herrmann; Vasilis Nikolaou; Terry J Quinn; Anna H Noel-Storr; Dallas P Seitz Journal: Cochrane Database Syst Rev Date: 2019-09-14
Authors: Calvin Ch Chan; Bruce A Fage; Jennifer K Burton; Nadja Smailagic; Sudeep S Gill; Nathan Herrmann; Vasilis Nikolaou; Terry J Quinn; Anna H Noel-Storr; Dallas P Seitz Journal: Cochrane Database Syst Rev Date: 2021-07-14