Literature DB >> 2752624

Reliability of the Genucom Knee Analysis System. A pilot study.

K J McQuade1, J A Sidles, R V Larson.   

Abstract

Instrumented knee laxity testing is now common practice in many orthopedic and rehabilitative practices around the country. The Genucom Knee Analysis System is marketed as a comprehensive quantitative knee joint laxity testing device. To examine the intrarater reliability of the Genucom, the authors evaluated five normal subjects, each on three independent occasions. All testing was done by a single examiner. Anteroposterior (AP) drawer, valgus/varus, and tibial rotation tests were performed. The average variability for repeated testing was determined and this variability was then used to estimate the smallest statistically significant difference for a single repeat examination that would represent true change, i.e., change over and above the inherent variability of the measurement. The results indicate that: (1) anterior drawer variability and tibial rotational variability are dependent on the knee flexion angle; (2) reporting anterior drawer may be more reproducible than reporting total AP motion; and (3) on average, changes exceeding 3 mm for anterior drawer tests, 5 mm for total valgus-varus motion, and 7 degrees-17 degrees of tibial rotation are needed to be 95% confident that the change in a measure from one time to the next is real and not due to measurement variability.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1989        PMID: 2752624

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res        ISSN: 0009-921X            Impact factor:   4.176


  8 in total

1.  The relationship of anterior and rotatory laxity between surgical navigation and clinical outcome after ACL reconstruction.

Authors:  Shingo Ohkawa; Nobuo Adachi; Masataka Deie; Atsuo Nakamae; Tomoyuki Nakasa; Mitsuo Ochi
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2012-01-20       Impact factor: 4.342

Review 2.  Quantitative measurement of the pivot shift, reliability, and clinical applications.

Authors:  Ryosuke Kuroda; Yuichi Hoshino; Daisuke Araki; Yuichiro Nishizawa; Kouki Nagamune; Tomoyuki Matsumoto; Seiji Kubo; Takehiko Matsushita; Masahiro Kurosaka
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2011-12-31       Impact factor: 4.342

Review 3.  Objective measurements of static anterior and rotational knee laxity.

Authors:  Caroline Mouton; Daniel Theisen; Romain Seil
Journal:  Curr Rev Musculoskelet Med       Date:  2016-06

Review 4.  Anterior cruciate ligament assessment using arthrometry and stress imaging.

Authors:  Eric M Rohman; Jeffrey A Macalena
Journal:  Curr Rev Musculoskelet Med       Date:  2016-06

5.  Evaluation of knee ligament injuries with the IKDC form.

Authors:  F Hefti; W Müller; R P Jakob; H U Stäubli
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  1993       Impact factor: 4.342

6.  An analysis of normative data on the knee rotatory profile and the usefulness of the Rotatometer, a new instrument for measuring tibiofemoral rotation: the reliability of the knee Rotatometer.

Authors:  Ju Hwan Chung; Keun Jung Ryu; Dong Hoon Lee; Kyung Ho Yoon; Yang Woo Park; Hyung Jong Kim; Jae Hwa Kim
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2014-05-10       Impact factor: 4.342

7.  Assessment of anterior cruciate laxity using the Genucom System.

Authors:  H N Andersen; P A Frandsen
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  1993-12       Impact factor: 3.075

8.  Rotational knee laxity: reliability of a simple measurement device in vivo.

Authors:  Andrew G Tsai; Volker Musahl; Hanno Steckel; Kevin M Bell; Thore Zantop; James J Irrgang; Freddie H Fu
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2008-03-18       Impact factor: 2.362

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.