Literature DB >> 27526203

Who is in control of road safety? A STAMP control structure analysis of the road transport system in Queensland, Australia.

Paul M Salmon1, Gemma J M Read2, Nicholas J Stevens2.   

Abstract

Despite significant progress, road trauma continues to represent a global safety issue. In Queensland (Qld), Australia, there is currently a focus on preventing the 'fatal five' behaviours underpinning road trauma (drug and drink driving, distraction, seat belt wearing, speeding, and fatigue), along with an emphasis on a shared responsibility for road safety that spans road users, vehicle manufacturers, designers, policy makers etc. The aim of this article is to clarify who shares the responsibility for road safety in Qld and to determine what control measures are enacted to prevent the fatal five behaviours. This is achieved through the presentation of a control structure model that depicts the actors and organisations within the Qld road transport system along with the control and feedback relationships that exist between them. Validated through a Delphi study, the model shows a diverse set of actors and organisations who share the responsibility for road safety that goes beyond those discussed in road safety policies and strategies. The analysis also shows that, compared to other safety critical domains, there are less formal control structures in road transport and that opportunities exist to add new controls and strengthen existing ones. Relationships that influence rather than control are also prominent. Finally, when compared to other safety critical domains, the strength of road safety controls is brought into question.
Copyright © 2016 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Control theory; Fatal five; Road safety; STAMP; Systems analysis

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27526203     DOI: 10.1016/j.aap.2016.05.025

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Accid Anal Prev        ISSN: 0001-4575


  6 in total

Review 1.  Integrating complex systems science into road safety research and practice, part 1: review of formative concepts.

Authors:  Rebecca B Naumann; Jill Kuhlberg; Laura Sandt; Stephen Heiny; Yorghos Apostolopoulos; Stephen W Marshall; Kristen Hassmiller Lich
Journal:  Inj Prev       Date:  2019-09-24       Impact factor: 2.399

2.  A systems thinking approach to understanding youth active recreation.

Authors:  Harriet Koorts; Paul M Salmon; Christopher T V Swain; Samuel Cassar; David Strickland; Jo Salmon
Journal:  Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act       Date:  2022-05-12       Impact factor: 8.915

3.  What's in a game? A systems approach to enhancing performance analysis in football.

Authors:  Scott McLean; Paul M Salmon; Adam D Gorman; Gemma J M Read; Colin Solomon
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2017-02-17       Impact factor: 3.240

4.  Using an evidence-based safety approach to develop China's road safety strategies.

Authors:  Bing Wang; Chao Wu
Journal:  J Glob Health       Date:  2019-12       Impact factor: 4.413

5.  Taking a mixed-methods approach to collision investigation: AcciMap, STAMP-CAST and PCM.

Authors:  Omar Faruqe Hamim; Shahnewaz Hasanat-E-Rabbi; Mithun Debnath; Md Shamsul Hoque; Rich C McIlroy; Katherine L Plant; Neville A Stanton
Journal:  Appl Ergon       Date:  2021-11-19       Impact factor: 3.661

6.  The relevance of U.S. Strategic Highway Safety Plans in a future context.

Authors:  Brett P Hughes; Torbjorn Falkmer; Anna Anund; Melissa H Black
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2019-10-07       Impact factor: 3.240

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.