| Literature DB >> 27525041 |
Tao Sheng1, Lei Zhao2, Ling-Fang Gao3, Wen-Zong Liu3, Min-Hua Cui1, Ze-Chong Guo1, Xiao-Dan Ma1, Shih-Hsin Ho1, Ai-Jie Wang4.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Lignocellulosic biomass is one of earth's most abundant resources, and it has great potential for biofuel production because it is renewable and has carbon-neutral characteristics. Lignocellulose is mainly composed of carbohydrate polymers (cellulose and hemicellulose), which contain approximately 75 % fermentable sugars for biofuel fermentation. However, saccharification by cellulases is always the main bottleneck for commercialization. Compared with the enzyme systems of fungi, bacteria have evolved distinct systems to directly degrade lignocellulose. However, most reported bacterial saccharification is not efficient enough without help from additional β-glucosidases. Thus, to enhance the economic feasibility of using lignocellulosic biomass for biofuel production, it will be extremely important to develop a novel bacterial saccharification system that does not require the addition of β-glucosidases.Entities:
Keywords: Cellulase; Glucose; Lignocellulose; Oligosaccharides; Ruminiclostridium thermocellum; Saccharification
Year: 2016 PMID: 27525041 PMCID: PMC4982309 DOI: 10.1186/s13068-016-0585-z
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Biotechnol Biofuels ISSN: 1754-6834 Impact factor: 6.040
Fig. 1Phylogenetic relationship of R. thermocellum M3 and other strains based on 16S rDNA gene sequences. Numbers along branches indicate bootstrap values with 1000 times
Physiological properties of R. thermocellum M3
| Characteristic | Value | Substrate utilization | Value |
|---|---|---|---|
| Gram staining | + | Avicel | + |
| Glucose | + | ||
| Fructose | + | ||
| Xylose | − | ||
| Maltose | + | ||
| Lactose | − | ||
| Morphology | Short rod-shaped, spore | Sucrose | + |
| Anaerobic growth | + | Cellobiose | + |
| Motility | + | Xylitol | − |
| Sulfate reduction | − | CMC | + |
| Nitrate reduction | − | Starch | + |
| Gelatin hydrolysis | + | ||
| Metabolic products with cellulose | Acetate, ethanol, lactate | Filter paper | + |
| NaCl tolerance | 1.25 % | ||
| Beef extract | + | ||
| (NH4)2SO4 | + | ||
| NH4Cl | + | ||
| NaNO3 | + |
− negative; + positive
Fig. 2Fermentation profile of R. thermocellum M3 under different cultivation conditions. a Effects of temperature on Avicel saccharification. b Effects of pH on Avicel saccharification. c Effects of YE concentration on Avicel saccharification. d Effects of Avicel concentration on Avicel saccharification
Fig. 3The time course profiles and kinetics of batch fermentation in 5 g/L Avicel medium. a Cellulose and oligosaccharides. b Metabolites, cell mass concentration and pH profile. c Carbon balance. d Enzyme activities
Fig. 4The time course profiles and kinetics of batch fermentation in 5 g/L untreated lignocellulose medium. a Oligosaccharide composition. b Oligosaccharide yield. c Enzyme activities. d Saccharification by commercial cellulase
Comparison of oligosaccharide yield form various researches with cellulosic substrates
| Microorganism | Substrate | Temperature (°C) | Oligosaccharide yielda (mg/g) | References |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
| Microcrystalline cellulose | 68 | 158 | [ |
|
| Microcrystalline cellulose | 60 | 216 | [ |
|
| Wheat straw | 50 | 157 | [ |
|
| Microcrystalline cellulose | 60 | 186 | [ |
|
| Cellobiose | 60 | 18.88 | [ |
|
| Microcrystalline cellulose | 40 | 375 | [ |
|
| Microcrystalline cellulose | 60 | 480 | This study |
aThe oligosaccharide yield was calculated as oligosaccharides/substrate