Literature DB >> 27524741

Spoligotype diversity and 5-year trends of bovine tuberculosis in Extremadura, southern Spain.

Waldo L García-Jiménez1,2, María Cortés3, José M Benítez-Medina3, Inés Hurtado3, Remigio Martínez3, Alfredo García-Sánchez4, David Risco3,5, Rosario Cerrato3,5, Cristina Sanz6, Miguel Hermoso-de-Mendoza3, Pedro Fernández-Llario3,5, Javier Hermoso-de-Mendoza3.   

Abstract

Bovine tuberculosis (bTB) causes significant losses to farming economies worldwide. A better understanding on the epidemiology of this disease and the role that the different hosts develop in the maintenance and spread of bTB is vital to control this zoonotic disease. This study reports the spoligotype diversity and temporal evolution of Mycobacterium tuberculosis Complex (MTBC) isolates obtained from Extremadura (southern Spain). Genotyping data of Mycobacterium bovis (n = 2102) and Mycobacterium caprae (n = 96) isolates from cattle and wildlife species, collected between 2008 and 2012, were used in this study. The isolates resulted clustered into 88 spoligotypes which varied largely in frequency and occurrence in the three hosts. The 20 most frequent patterns represented 91.99 % of the isolates, the spoligotype SB0121 being the clearly predominant and most widely dispersed geographically. The major variety of the spoligotype patterns (78 out of 88) was isolated from the cattle, in fact 50 (56.83 %) of the patterns were found only in this species. Within the spoligotypes shared between the cattle and wildlife species, 17 patterns (1747 isolates) were shared with wild boar and Iberian red deer, 10 patterns (308 isolates) were exclusively shared with wild boar, and only one pattern (two isolates) was shared exclusively with Iberian red deer. The significant number of spoligotypes shared between the three hosts (79.49 %) highlights the components of the multi-host system that allows the bTB maintenance in our study area. The greater percentage of isolates shared by the wild boar and cattle (93.50 %) supports the role of wild boar as main maintenance host for bTB in cattle. These results could be extrapolated to areas with a similar epidemiological scenario and could be helpful for other countries where wild reservoirs represent a handicap for the successful eradication of bTB from livestock.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Bovine tuberculosis; Cattle; Spoligotyping; Wildlife reservoirs

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27524741     DOI: 10.1007/s11250-016-1124-4

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Trop Anim Health Prod        ISSN: 0049-4747            Impact factor:   1.559


  30 in total

1.  Impact of the national full herd depopulation policy on the recurrence of bovine tuberculosis in Irish herds, 2003 to 2005.

Authors:  M Good; T A Clegg; A Duignan; S J More
Journal:  Vet Rec       Date:  2011-08-25       Impact factor: 2.695

2.  Control of bovine tuberculosis in New Zealand in the face of a wildlife host: a compiled review of 50 years of programme policy, design and research.

Authors:  Richard Dez Delahay
Journal:  N Z Vet J       Date:  2015-06-02       Impact factor: 1.628

3.  An evaluation of 1-hexadecylpyridinium chloride as a decontaminant in the primary isolation of Mycobacterium bovis from bovine lesions.

Authors:  L A Corner; A C Trajstman
Journal:  Vet Microbiol       Date:  1988-10       Impact factor: 3.293

Review 4.  Molecular epidemiology of Mycobacterium bovis: exploiting molecular data.

Authors:  R A Skuce; S D Neill
Journal:  Tuberculosis (Edinb)       Date:  2001       Impact factor: 3.131

5.  Mycobacterium tuberculosis subsp. caprae subsp. nov.: a taxonomic study of a new member of the Mycobacterium tuberculosis complex isolated from goats in Spain.

Authors:  A Aranaz; E Liébana; E Gómez-Mampaso; J C Galán; D Cousins; A Ortega; J Blázquez; F Baquero; A Mateos; G Súarez; L Domínguez
Journal:  Int J Syst Bacteriol       Date:  1999-07

6.  Detection and identification of multiple mycobacterial pathogens by DNA amplification in a single tube.

Authors:  S Wilton; D Cousins
Journal:  PCR Methods Appl       Date:  1992-05

7.  Persistence and molecular evolution of Mycobacterium bovis population from cattle and wildlife in Doñana National Park revealed by genotype variation.

Authors:  Beatriz Romero; Alicia Aranaz; Angel Sandoval; Julio Alvarez; Lucía de Juan; Javier Bezos; Celia Sánchez; Margarita Galka; Pilar Fernández; Ana Mateos; Lucas Domínguez
Journal:  Vet Microbiol       Date:  2008-04-30       Impact factor: 3.293

Review 8.  Bovine Tuberculosis in Cattle: Vaccines, DIVA Tests, and Host Biomarker Discovery.

Authors:  H Martin Vordermeier; Gareth J Jones; Bryce M Buddle; R Glyn Hewinson; Bernardo Villarreal-Ramos
Journal:  Annu Rev Anim Biosci       Date:  2016       Impact factor: 8.923

9.  Mycobacterium caprae infection in livestock and wildlife, Spain.

Authors:  Sabrina Rodríguez; Javier Bezos; Beatriz Romero; Lucía de Juan; Julio Álvarez; Elena Castellanos; Nuria Moya; Francisco Lozano; M Tariq Javed; José L Sáez-Llorente; Ernesto Liébana; Ana Mateos; Lucas Domínguez; Alicia Aranaz
Journal:  Emerg Infect Dis       Date:  2011-03       Impact factor: 6.883

10.  Spatial dynamics of bovine tuberculosis in the Autonomous Community of Madrid, Spain (2010-2012).

Authors:  Maria Luisa de la Cruz; Andres Perez; Javier Bezos; Enrique Pages; Carmen Casal; Jesus Carpintero; Beatriz Romero; Lucas Dominguez; Christopher M Barker; Rosa Diaz; Julio Alvarez
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-12-23       Impact factor: 3.240

View more
  2 in total

1.  Long-term molecular surveillance provides clues on a cattle origin for Mycobacterium bovis in Portugal.

Authors:  Ana C Reis; Rogério Tenreiro; Teresa Albuquerque; Ana Botelho; Mónica V Cunha
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2020-11-30       Impact factor: 4.379

2.  Evaluation of Three Commercial Interferon-γ Assays in a Bovine Tuberculosis Free Population.

Authors:  Giovanni Ghielmetti; Patricia Landolt; Ute Friedel; Marina Morach; Sonja Hartnack; Roger Stephan; Sarah Schmitt
Journal:  Front Vet Sci       Date:  2021-06-10
  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.