| Literature DB >> 21392452 |
Sabrina Rodríguez1, Javier Bezos, Beatriz Romero, Lucía de Juan, Julio Álvarez, Elena Castellanos, Nuria Moya, Francisco Lozano, M Tariq Javed, José L Sáez-Llorente, Ernesto Liébana, Ana Mateos, Lucas Domínguez, Alicia Aranaz.
Abstract
Mycobacterium caprae is a pathogen that can infect animals and humans. To better understand the epidemiology of M. caprae, we spoligotyped 791 animal isolates. Results suggest infection is widespread in Spain, affecting 6 domestic and wild animal species. The epidemiology is driven by infections in caprids, although the organism has emerged in cattle.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2011 PMID: 21392452 PMCID: PMC3165998 DOI: 10.3201/eid1703.100618
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Emerg Infect Dis ISSN: 1080-6040 Impact factor: 6.883
Figure 1Map of Spain showing the distribution of the 2 most frequent Mycobacterium caprae spoligotypes and affected animals: C, cattle; D, red deer; F, fox; G, goats; S, sheep; P, pigs; WB, wild boar. A) Spoligotype SB0157. B) Spoligotype SB0416.
Spoligotyping results of 791 Mycobacterium caprae isolates and their distribution within different animal species, Spain, 1992–2009*
| Ref | Spoligotyping pattern† | No. animals (no. outbreaks) | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Goats | Sheep | Cattle | Pigs | Wild
boar | Red
deer | Fox | ||
| SB0157 | □■□□□□□□□□□□□□□□■■■■■□□■■■■□■□□□□■■■■■□□□□□ | 204 (44) | 1 | 133 (67) | 1 | 4 (4) | 1 | |
| SB0415 | □■□□□□□□□□□□□□□□■■□■■■■■■■■□■□□□□■■■■■□□□□□ | 37 (4) | 1 | 8 (4) | 4 (3) | |||
| SB0416 | □■□□□□□□□□□□□□□□■■■■■■■■■■■□■□□□□■■■■■□□□□□ | 80 (18) | 58 (21) | 5 (3) | 1 | |||
| SB0866 | □■□□□□□□□□□□□□□□■■■■■■■■□□□□□□□□□□□□□□□□□□□ | 1 | 1 | 1 | ||||
| SB0973 | □□□□□□□□□□□□□□□□■■■■■□□■■■■□■□□□□□■□■■□□□□□ | 1 | ||||||
| SB1077 | □■□□□□□□□□□□□□□□■■■■■■■■■□□□■□□□□■■■■■□□□□□ | 17 (4) | 1 | |||||
| SB1078 | □■□□□□□□□□□□□□□□■■■■□□□■■■■□■□□□□■■■■■□□□□□ | 1 | 1 | |||||
| SB1079 | □□□□□□□□□□□□□□□□■■■■□□□■■■■□■□□□□□■□■■□□□□□ | 1 | ||||||
| SB1080 | □■□□□□□□□□□□□□□□■■■■■■■■■■□□■□□□□■■■■■□□□□□ | 2 (1) | ||||||
| SB1081 | □■□□□□□□□□□□□□□□■■■■■□□■□□□□□□□□□□□□□□□□□□□ | 1 | 8 (4) | |||||
| SB1084 | □■□□□□□□□□□□□□□□■■□■■■■□■■■□■□□□□■■■■■□□□□□ | 211 (1) | ||||||
| SB1889 | □■□□□□□□□□□□□□□□■■□■■■■□□□□□□□□□□□□□□□□□□□□ | 2 (1) | ||||||
| SB1872 | □□□□□□□□□□□□□□□□□□■■■□□■■■■□■□□□□■■■■■□□□□□ | 1 | ||||||
| SB0418 | □■□□□□□□□□□□□□□□■■■■■■■■■■■□■■■■■■■■■■□□□□□ | 2 (2) | ||||||
| SB1690 | □■□□□□□□□□□□□□□□■■■■■■□■■■■□■■■■■■■■■■□□□□□ |
|
| 1 |
|
|
|
|
| Total | 542 (75) | 2 (2) | 229 (105) | 2 (2) | 14 (11) | 1 | 1 | |
*Ref, reference. Numbering according to www.Mbovis.org. †■, presence of spacer ; □, absence of spacer.
Variable number tandem repeat analysis of isolates from 10 farms that presented mixed Mycobacterium caprae infection (different spoligotype patterns), Spain, 1992–2009*
| Farm | Animal | Spoligotype | No. alleles at locus | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ETR-A | ETR-B | ETR-D | QUB3232 | QUB 11a | QUB 11b | MIRU 26 | MIRU 31 | |||
| 1 | Goat | SB0416 | 4 | 4 | 4 | 8 | 7 | 2 | 5 | 2 |
| SB0866 | 5 | 3 | 3 | 8 | 7 | 4 | 2 | 4 | ||
| 2 | Goat | SB0416 | 4 | 3 | 4 | 8 | 7 | 2 | 4 | 2 |
| SB0157 | 4 | 3 | 4 | 8 | 7 | 2 | 4 | 2 | ||
| 3 | Goat | SB0416 | 4 | 5 | 5 | 7 | 6 | 4 | 5 | 5 |
| SB0415 | 5 | 1 | 3 | 8 | 7 | 3 | 5 | 5 | ||
| 4 | Cattle | SB0157 | 3 | 3 | 4 | 8 | 7 | 2 | 5 | 2 |
| SB1081 | 3 | 3 | 4 | 8 | 7 | 2 | 5 | 2 | ||
| 5 | Cattle | SB0157 | 4 | 3 | 4 | 3 | 7 | 2 | 5 | 2 |
| SB1081 | 4 | 3 | 4 | 3 | 7 | 2 | 5 | 2 | ||
| 6 | Goat | SB0157 | 4 | 3 | 4 | 8 | 7 | 2 | 5 | 2 |
| SB1078 | 4 | 3 | 4 | 8 | 7 | 2 | 5 | 2 | ||
| 7 | Goat | SB1084 | 5 | 1 | 3 | 9 | 5† | 3 | 5 | 4 |
| SB1889 | 5 | 1 | 3 | 9 | 5† | 3 | 5 | 4 | ||
| 8 | Cattle | SB0157 | 4 | 3 | 4 | 8 | 7 | 2 | 5 | 2 |
| SB1081 | 4 | 3 | 4 | 8 | 7 | 2 | 5 | 2 | ||
| 9 | Cattle | SB0416 | 5 | 3 | 3 | 8 | 6 | 4 | 2 | 3 |
| SB0157 | 4 | 3 | 4 | 8 | 7 | 2 | 5 | 2 | ||
| 10 | Goat | SB0973 | 4 | 3 | – | – | – | – | – | – |
| SB0157 | 4 | 3 | 4 | 9 | – | 2 | 5 | – | ||
*–, no amplification. †Gel band of ≈1,800 bp. Sequencing showed that insertion sequence IS6110 is inserted within the third repetition of QUB11a.
Figure 2Proportion and regression lines of Mycobacterium caprae isolates (black dots, continuous line) and M. caprae–infected herds (white triangles, dashed lines) of the total number of M. tuberculosis complex isolates and M. tuberculosis complex–infected herds identified in cattle during 2004–2009. Error bars indicate 95% confidence intervals.