| Literature DB >> 27522533 |
Bruna Zucoloto da Costa1, Viviane Drumond Rodrigues2, Valéria Maia de Oliveira3, Laura Maria Mariscal Ottoboni2, Anita Jocelyne Marsaioli4.
Abstract
Copper mine drainages are restricted environments that have been overlooked as sources of new biocatalysts for bioremediation and organic syntheses. Therefore, this study aimed to determine the enzymatic activities (esterase, epoxide hydrolase and monooxygenase) of 56 heterotrophic bacteria isolated from a neutral copper mine drainage (Sossego Mine, Canaã dos Carajás, Brazil). Hydrolase and monooxygenase activities were detected in 75% and 20% of the evaluated bacteria, respectively. Bacterial strains with good oxidative performance were also evaluated for biotransformation of organic sulfides. Fourteen strains with good enzymatic activity were identified by 16S rRNA gene sequencing, revealing the presence of three genera: Bacillus, Pseudomonas and Stenotrophomonas. The bacterial strains B. megaterium (SO5-4 and SO6-2) and Pseudomonas sp. (SO5-9) efficiently oxidized three different organic sulfides to their corresponding sulfoxides. In conclusion, this study revealed that neutral copper mine drainages are a promising source of biocatalysts for ester hydrolysis and sulfide oxidation/bioremediation. Furthermore, this is a novel biotechnological overview of the heterotrophic bacteria from a copper mine drainage, and this report may support further microbiological monitoring of this type of mine environment.Entities:
Keywords: Copper mine drainage; High-throughput screening; Hydrolases; Monooxygenases
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2016 PMID: 27522533 PMCID: PMC5052376 DOI: 10.1016/j.bjm.2016.07.004
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Braz J Microbiol ISSN: 1517-8382 Impact factor: 2.476
Scheme 1Fluorescence-based HTS assay for detection of esterases (EST, 2–4), epoxide hydrolases (EH, 5–6) and monooxygenases (BVMO, 7–10).
Esterase and monooxygenase activities of heterotrophic bacteria isolated from a neutral copper mine drainage detected by fluorescence-based HTS assays using probes 2–4a and 7–10.a
| Strain ID | Conversion (%) | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2 | 3 | 4 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | |
| SO5-1 | – | 29 | – | 5 | 7 | – | – |
| SO5-2 | – | – | – | 9 | – | 12 | – |
| SO5-3 | 45 | – | – | – | – | – | – |
| SO5-4 | – | – | – | – | 16 | – | – |
| SO5-5 | – | – | – | – | 14 | 7 | – |
| SO5-6 | >99 | 21 | – | – | – | – | – |
| SO5-7 | – | 10 | 5 | – | – | 30 | – |
| SO5-8 | 63 | – | – | – | – | – | – |
| SO5-9 | – | – | – | – | 5 | 21 | – |
| SO5-10 | – | 17 | – | – | – | 29 | – |
| SO5-13 | >99 | 11 | – | – | – | – | – |
| SO5-14 | 76 | 10 | – | – | – | – | – |
| SO5-16 | 64 | – | – | – | – | – | – |
| SO5-17 | 70 | – | – | – | – | – | – |
| SO5-18 | 90 | 8 | – | 8 | – | – | – |
| SO5-19 | – | 18 | – | – | – | – | – |
| SO5-21 | 76 | – | – | – | – | – | – |
| SO6-2 | – | 56 | – | – | 29 | – | – |
| SO6-3 | – | 19 | – | – | – | – | – |
| SO6-4 | – | 15 | – | – | – | – | – |
| SO6-5 | 84 | 6 | – | – | – | – | – |
| SO6-6 | 33 | – | – | – | – | – | – |
| SO6-7 | 89 | – | – | – | – | – | – |
| SO6-8 | 69 | – | – | – | – | – | – |
| SO6-9 | 57 | – | – | – | – | – | – |
| SO6-12 | 14 | >99 | – | 6 | – | – | – |
| SO6-14 | – | 17 | – | – | – | – | – |
| SO6-15 | 88 | 18 | – | – | – | – | – |
| SO6-16 | – | 15 | – | – | – | – | – |
| SO6-18 | – | 33 | – | – | – | – | – |
| SO6-19 | – | 9 | – | – | – | – | – |
| SO6-20 | 82 | – | – | – | – | – | – |
| SO6-22 | 75 | – | – | – | – | – | – |
| SO7-1 | – | 13 | – | – | – | – | – |
| SO7-2 | – | 27 | 11 | 7 | – | – | – |
| SO7-3 | 91 | 46 | – | – | – | – | – |
| SO7-6 | 25 | 12 | – | – | – | – | – |
| SO7-7 | >99 | – | – | – | – | – | – |
| SO7-8 | 19 | 11 | – | – | – | – | – |
| SO7-9 | – | 13 | – | – | – | – | – |
| SO7-10 | >99 | – | – | – | – | – | – |
| SO7-11 | 80 | – | – | – | – | – | – |
| SO7-12 | 10 | 11 | – | – | – | – | – |
| SO7-13 | – | 31 | – | – | – | – | – |
| SO7-14 | 21 | 11 | – | – | – | – | – |
| SO7-15 | >99 | – | – | – | – | – | – |
See Scheme 1.
Chromatographic conversion (%) of multibioreaction assays for sulfide (18–21) oxidation,a catalyzed by bacteria from a neutral copper mine drainage.
| Strain ID | Conversion (%) | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 18 | 19 | 20 | 21 | |
| SO5-1 | 3 | 1 | – | – |
| SO5-2 | 1 | – | – | – |
| SO5-4 | 20 | 7 | 11 | – |
| SO5-5 | 7 | – | 1 | – |
| SO5-7 | 10 | – | 1 | – |
| SO5-9 | 22 | 7 | 30 | – |
| SO5-10 | 4 | – | – | – |
| SO6-2 | 12 | 5 | 9 | – |
See Scheme 2.
Scheme 2Substrates (18–21) used for detection of organic sulfide biooxidation and their respective, expected products (18a–21a).
Scheme 3Diastereoselective biooxidation of sulfide rac-cis-19 catalyzed by bacteria SO5-4, SO5-9 and SO6-2.
Identification of heterotrophic bacterial strains isolated from a neutral copper mine drainage by sequencing of the 16S rRNA gene.
| Strain ID | Sample | Identification | GenBank ID |
|---|---|---|---|
| SO5-1 | SO5 | ||
| SO5-2 | SO5 | ||
| SO5-4 | SO5 | ||
| SO5-5 | SO5 | ||
| SO5-6 | SO5 | ||
| SO5-7 | SO5 | ||
| SO5-9 | SO5 | ||
| SO5-10 | SO5 | ||
| SO5-13 | SO5 | ||
| SO6-2 | SO6 | ||
| SO6-12 | SO6 | ||
| SO7-7 | SO7 | ||
| SO7-10 | SO7 | ||
| SO7-15 | SO7 |
Fig. 1Phylogenetic analysis based on partial 16 rRNA gene sequences of the identified bacterial strains and related microorganisms. The evolutionary history was inferred using the Maximum Likelihood method based on the Kimura 2-parameter model. The numbers at nodes indicate bootstrap percent values from the Maximum Likelihood analysis, based on 1000 resampled data sets. Only significant bootstrap values greater than 65% are shown near each node. Bars represent sequence divergence, and the sequence accession numbers are indicated in parenthesis. Nostoc punctiforme was used as the outgroup.