Literature DB >> 27522247

Prostate cancer outcomes of men with biopsy Gleason score 6 and 7 without cribriform or intraductal carcinoma.

Charlotte F Kweldam1, Intan P Kümmerlin2, Daan Nieboer3, Esther I Verhoef2, Ewout W Steyerberg3, Luca Incrocci4, Chris H Bangma5, Theodorus H van der Kwast6, Monique J Roobol5, Geert J van Leenders2.   

Abstract

AIM OF THE STUDY: Gleason score (GS) 3 + 4 = 7 prostate cancer patients with presence of cribriform or intraductal carcinoma (7(+)) have a worse disease-specific survival than those without. The aim of this study was to compare the clinicopathologic characteristics and patient outcomes of men with biopsy GS 3 + 4 = 7 without cribriform or intraductal carcinoma (7(-)) to those with GS 3 + 3 = 6.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: We included all patients from the first screening round of the European Randomized Study of Screening for Prostate Cancer (1993-2000) with a revised GS ≤ 3 + 4 = 7 (n = 796) following the 2014 International Society of Urological Pathology criteria. Relations with biochemical recurrence after radical prostatectomy or radiotherapy were analysed using log-rank testing and multivariable Cox regression analysis.
RESULTS: In total, 486 patients had GS 6 and 310 had GS 7, 54 of whom had GS 7(+) (17%). During a median follow-up of 15 years, biochemical recurrence was seen in 61 (20%) GS 6, 54 (21%) GS 7(-) and 22 (41%) GS 7(+) patients (41%). Both biopsy GS 7(-) and 7(+) patients had significantly higher prostate-specific antigen levels, mean tumour percentage, percentage of positive cores and ≥cT3 than those with GS 6 (all P < .001). GS 7(-) patients did not have a poorer biochemical recurrence-free survival (BCRFS) after radical prostatectomy than GS 6 patients (log-rank P = .13), whereas those with GS 7(+) had (log-rank P = .05). In multivariable analyses, biopsy GS 7(-) was not associated with poorer BCRFS after radical prostatectomy (hazard ratio [HR], 1.3; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.67-2.4; P = .47) or radiotherapy (HR, 0.88; 95% CI: 0.51-1.5; P = .63). GS 7(+) was independently associated with poorer BCRFS after radical prostatectomy (HR, 3.0; 95% CI: 1.1-7.8; P = .03), but not after radiotherapy (HR, 1.2; 95% CI: 0.58-2.3; P = .67).
CONCLUSIONS: Men with biopsy GS 7(-) prostate cancer have similar BCRFS after radical prostatectomy or radiotherapy to those with GS 6 and may be candidates for active surveillance as long as other inclusion criteria such as on PSA and tumour volume are met.
Copyright © 2016 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Cribriform; Intraductal carcinoma; Prostate cancer

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27522247     DOI: 10.1016/j.ejca.2016.07.012

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur J Cancer        ISSN: 0959-8049            Impact factor:   9.162


  16 in total

1.  Comedonecrosis Revisited: Strong Association With Intraductal Carcinoma of the Prostate.

Authors:  Samson W Fine; Hikmat A Al-Ahmadie; Ying-Bei Chen; Anuradha Gopalan; Satish K Tickoo; Victor E Reuter
Journal:  Am J Surg Pathol       Date:  2018-08       Impact factor: 6.394

2.  Rapid Histological Assessment of Prostate Specimens in the Three-dimensional Space by Hydrophilic Tissue Clearing and Confocal Microscopy.

Authors:  Yu-Ching Peng; Yu-Chieh Lin; Yu-Ling Hung; Chien-Chung Fu; Margaret Dah-Tsyr Chang; Yen-Yin Lin; Teh-Ying Chou
Journal:  J Histochem Cytochem       Date:  2022-07-30       Impact factor: 4.137

3.  AI Model for Prostate Biopsies Predicts Cancer Survival.

Authors:  Kevin Sandeman; Sami Blom; Ville Koponen; Anniina Manninen; Juuso Juhila; Antti Rannikko; Tuomas Ropponen; Tuomas Mirtti
Journal:  Diagnostics (Basel)       Date:  2022-04-20

Review 4.  Advances in the selection of patients with prostate cancer for active surveillance.

Authors:  James L Liu; Hiten D Patel; Nora M Haney; Jonathan I Epstein; Alan W Partin
Journal:  Nat Rev Urol       Date:  2021-02-23       Impact factor: 14.432

5.  GPS Assay Association With Long-Term Cancer Outcomes: Twenty-Year Risk of Distant Metastasis and Prostate Cancer-Specific Mortality.

Authors:  Michael A Brooks; Lewis Thomas; Cristina Magi-Galluzzi; Jianbo Li; Michael R Crager; Ruixiao Lu; John Abran; Tamer Aboushwareb; Eric A Klein
Journal:  JCO Precis Oncol       Date:  2021-02-24

6.  Head-to-head comparison of prostate cancer risk calculators predicting biopsy outcome.

Authors:  Nuno Pereira-Azevedo; Jan F M Verbeek; Daan Nieboer; Chris H Bangma; Monique J Roobol
Journal:  Transl Androl Urol       Date:  2018-02

Review 7.  On cribriform prostate cancer.

Authors:  Charlotte F Kweldam; Theodorus van der Kwast; Geert J van Leenders
Journal:  Transl Androl Urol       Date:  2018-02

8.  Concordance of cribriform architecture in matched prostate cancer biopsy and radical prostatectomy specimens.

Authors:  Eva Hollemans; Esther I Verhoef; Chris H Bangma; Ivo Schoots; John Rietbergen; Jozien Helleman; Monique J Roobol; Geert J L H van Leenders
Journal:  Histopathology       Date:  2019-08-02       Impact factor: 5.087

9.  The 2019 International Society of Urological Pathology (ISUP) Consensus Conference on Grading of Prostatic Carcinoma.

Authors:  Geert J L H van Leenders; Theodorus H van der Kwast; David J Grignon; Andrew J Evans; Glen Kristiansen; Charlotte F Kweldam; Geert Litjens; Jesse K McKenney; Jonathan Melamed; Nicholas Mottet; Gladell P Paner; Hemamali Samaratunga; Ivo G Schoots; Jeffry P Simko; Toyonori Tsuzuki; Murali Varma; Anne Y Warren; Thomas M Wheeler; Sean R Williamson; Kenneth A Iczkowski
Journal:  Am J Surg Pathol       Date:  2020-08       Impact factor: 6.298

10.  Clinical outcome comparison of Grade Group 1 and Grade Group 2 prostate cancer with and without cribriform architecture at the time of radical prostatectomy.

Authors:  Eva Hollemans; Esther I Verhoef; Chris H Bangma; John Rietbergen; Monique J Roobol; Jozien Helleman; Geert J L H van Leenders
Journal:  Histopathology       Date:  2020-04       Impact factor: 5.087

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.