Literature DB >> 27520304

Sex-related trends in mortality after elective abdominal aortic aneurysm surgery between 2002 and 2013 at National Health Service hospitals in England: less benefit for women compared with men.

Mital Desai1, Edward Choke2, Robert D Sayers2, Mintu Nath2, Matthew J Bown2,3.   

Abstract

AIMS: To quantify the difference in long-term survival and cardiovascular morbidity between women and men undergoing elective abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) repair at National Health Service hospitals in England. METHODS AND
RESULTS: Patients having elective repair of AAA were reviewed using the Hospital Episode Statistics and Office for National Statistics (ONS) datasets. The primary outcome measure was 30-day mortality and the secondary outcomes were 1-year, 5-year, and aortic-related mortality and post-operative complication rates. We used logistic regression and survival models to assess risk factors on the primary and secondary outcomes. Between 1 April 2002 and 31 March 2013, a total of 31 090 patients (4795 women and 26 295 men) underwent open AAA repair. Between 1 January 2006 and 31 March 2013, a total of 16 777 patients (2036 women and 14 741 men) underwent endovascular aneurysm repair (EVAR). All-cause and aortic-related mortalities at 30 days, 1 year, and 5 years were all higher in women, despite a lower prevalence of pre-operative cardiovascular risk factors. Female sex was a significant independent risk factor for 30-day mortality in both open repair [odds ratio (OR) 1.39; 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.25-1.56; P < 0.001] and EVAR (OR 1.57; 95% CI 1.23-2.00; P < 0.001) groups. Based on an all-cause long-term survival model, conditional on 30-day survival, the estimated hazard for women in the open repair group was significantly (P = 0.006) higher than men, but the sex difference was not significant in the EVAR group (P = 0.356). In the open repair group, women had significantly (P < 0.001) higher cumulative incidence probabilities for both aortic-related mortality and other-cause mortality. In the EVAR group, women had significantly (P < 0.001) higher mean cumulative incidence probabilities for the aortic-related mortality compared with men, but not for the other-cause mortality (P = 0.235).
CONCLUSION: Women undergoing elective AAA repair at National Health Service hospitals in England had increased short- and long-term mortality and post-operative morbidity compared with men. These findings can be used to improve pre-operative counselling for women undergoing AAA repair, and highlight the need for female-specific pre-, peri-, and post-operative management strategies. Published on behalf of the European Society of Cardiology. All rights reserved.
© The Author 2016. For permissions please email: journals.permissions@oup.com.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Abdominal aortic aneurysm; England; National Health Service; Women

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27520304     DOI: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehw335

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur Heart J        ISSN: 0195-668X            Impact factor:   29.983


  8 in total

Review 1.  Consideration of Sex Differences in Design and Reporting of Experimental Arterial Pathology Studies-Statement From ATVB Council.

Authors:  Peggy Robinet; Dianna M Milewicz; Lisa A Cassis; Nicholas J Leeper; Hong S Lu; Jonathan D Smith
Journal:  Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol       Date:  2018-01-04       Impact factor: 8.311

2.  Incidence, Treatment and Mortality in Patients with Abdominal Aortic Aneurysms.

Authors:  Andreas Kühnl; Alexander Erk; Matthias Trenner; Michael Salvermoser; Volker Schmid; Hans-Henning Eckstein
Journal:  Dtsch Arztebl Int       Date:  2017-06-05       Impact factor: 5.594

3.  Sex differences in mortality after abdominal aortic aneurysm repair in the UK.

Authors:  D A Sidloff; A Saratzis; M J Sweeting; J Michaels; J T Powell; S G Thompson; M J Bown
Journal:  Br J Surg       Date:  2017-07-26       Impact factor: 6.939

Review 4.  Morphological suitability for endovascular repair, non-intervention rates, and operative mortality in women and men assessed for intact abdominal aortic aneurysm repair: systematic reviews with meta-analysis.

Authors:  Pinar Ulug; Michael J Sweeting; Regula S von Allmen; Simon G Thompson; Janet T Powell
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2017-04-25       Impact factor: 79.321

5.  Comparative analysis of the outcomes of elective abdominal aortic aneurysm repair in England and Sweden.

Authors:  A Karthikesalingam; M J Grima; P J Holt; A Vidal-Diez; M M Thompson; A Wanhainen; M Bjorck; K Mani
Journal:  Br J Surg       Date:  2018-02-22       Impact factor: 6.939

6.  Outcomes of aortic aneurysm surgery in England: a nationwide cohort study using hospital admissions data from 2002 to 2015.

Authors:  Ahmed Aber; Thaison Tong; Jim Chilcott; Ravi Maheswaran; Steven M Thomas; Shah Nawaz; Jonathan Michaels
Journal:  BMC Health Serv Res       Date:  2019-12-23       Impact factor: 2.655

7.  Sex Differences in Rupture Risk and Mortality in Untreated Patients With Intact Abdominal Aortic Aneurysms.

Authors:  Mareia Talvitie; Malin Stenman; Joy Roy; Karin Leander; Rebecka Hultgren
Journal:  J Am Heart Assoc       Date:  2021-02-23       Impact factor: 5.501

8.  Multicentre Covariate Adjustment Analysis of Short-Term and 5-Year Outcomes after Endovascular Repair according to Sex.

Authors:  Bibombe P Mwipatayi; Rebekah L W Tan; Joseph Faraj; Ali Daneshmand; Olufemi Oshin; Nishath Altaf; Shannon D Thomas; Patrik J Tosenovsky; Jackie Wong; Vikram Vijayan; Anthony J Freeman; Sally A Burrows
Journal:  Surg Res Pract       Date:  2020-03-09
  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.