Literature DB >> 27519493

Cefminox versus Cefoxitin in Hysterectomy Prophylaxis : Clinical Efficacy and Serum and Tissue Concentrations.

R Garrido1, A Novo2, S Quintana2, M A Macía3, L Carrasco1, M J de Dios1, J M Romo1, M Sánchez1, M Vargas1, M Maciá2, F Lapuente2, Y Mieza2, P Coronet4, M Gimeno4, A J Carcas3, J Frías3, V Caballero Fernández1.   

Abstract

This phase III, prospective, randomised, open, controlled clinical trial compared the efficacy of single-dose cefminox (2g) versus triple-dose cefoxitin (2g every 4 hours) as antibiotic prophylaxis in 112 women undergoing gynaecological surgery (vaginal or abdominal hysterectomy). Peak, intraoperative and trough serum concentrations were determined for both antibiotics, as well as their concentrations in myometrial tissue in a subset of patients from the study (22 patients from the cefminox group and 18 from the cefoxitin group). Clinical response was satisfactory in all women treated with cefminox (59 of 59) and in 52 of 53 patients treated with cefoxitin. Fever-related morbidity, hospital stay and adverse reactions were similar in both groups. Peak serum concentrations were 132.3 mg/L for cefminox and 82.2 mg/L for cefoxitin. 12-hour concentrations were 2.82 mg/L for cefminox and 2.17 mg/L for cefoxitin, and were higher than the respective minimum inhibitory concentrations (MICs) for pathogens commonly associated with this pathology. Uterine tissue concentrations were 24.5 and 41.6 mg/L for cefminox and cefoxitin, respectively, and also clearly exceeded MIC. It was shown that the use of a single preoperative dose of cefminox was similar in efficacy to 3 doses of cefoxitin administered every 4 hours, and that the serum and tissue concentrations attained provide adequate antibiotic coverage. In view of the general trend towards the use of a single dose for prophylaxis, cefminox offers a new alternative for antibiotic prophylaxis in gynaecological surgery.

Entities:  

Year:  1997        PMID: 27519493     DOI: 10.2165/00044011-199713060-00004

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Drug Investig        ISSN: 1173-2563            Impact factor:   2.859


  21 in total

1.  The timing of prophylactic administration of antibiotics and the risk of surgical-wound infection.

Authors:  D C Classen; R S Evans; S L Pestotnik; S D Horn; R L Menlove; J P Burke
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  1992-01-30       Impact factor: 91.245

2.  Comparative pharmacokinetics of cefotetan and cefoxitin in patients undergoing hysterectomies and colorectal operations.

Authors:  R Quintiliani; C H Nightingale; R C Stevens; W R Outman; P J Deckers; M G Martens
Journal:  Am J Surg       Date:  1988-05-31       Impact factor: 2.565

3.  Anaerobic microflora of the cervix in healthy women.

Authors:  S L Gorbach; K B Menda; H Thadepalli; L Keith
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  1973-12-15       Impact factor: 8.661

4.  Guidelines for antibiotic prophylaxis in gynecology.

Authors:  W J Ledger; C Gee; W P Lewis
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  1975-04-15       Impact factor: 8.661

5.  A novel method to predict the elimination half-lives and the renal excretion mechanisms of cephalosporins.

Authors:  I Komiya; M Nishio; S Murata; F Chiba; T Sakurai; S Shinkai; M Fujita
Journal:  J Pharmacobiodyn       Date:  1984-08

6.  Cefminox: correlation between in-vitro susceptibility and pharmacokinetics and serum bactericidal activity in healthy volunteers.

Authors:  L Aguilar; C Esteban; J Frias; I Pérez-Balcabao; A J Carcas; R Dal-Ré
Journal:  J Antimicrob Chemother       Date:  1994-01       Impact factor: 5.790

Review 7.  Cefoxitin: a review of its antibacterial activity, pharmacological properties and therapeutic use.

Authors:  R N Brogden; R C Heel; T M Speight; G S Avery
Journal:  Drugs       Date:  1979-01       Impact factor: 9.546

Review 8.  The importance of pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic surrogate markers to outcome. Focus on antibacterial agents.

Authors:  J M Hyatt; P S McKinnon; G S Zimmer; J J Schentag
Journal:  Clin Pharmacokinet       Date:  1995-02       Impact factor: 6.447

9.  Serum and tissue concentrations of cefoxitin and cefotaxime in women undergoing hysterectomy.

Authors:  R L White; C H Nightingale; R Quintiliani; K F Whitaker; R F Jones; W H Tripp
Journal:  Drugs       Date:  1988       Impact factor: 9.546

10.  Comparative efficacy and safety of cefmetazole or cefoxitin in the prevention of postoperative infection following vaginal and abdominal hysterectomy.

Authors:  S Roy; J Wilkins; E Galaif; C Azen
Journal:  J Antimicrob Chemother       Date:  1989-04       Impact factor: 5.790

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.