Hung-Jui Tan1, Karim Chamie2, Timothy J Daskivich3, Mark S Litwin2,4,5, Jim C Hu6. 1. Department of Urology, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina. 2. Department of Urology, David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California at Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California. 3. Division of Urology, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, California. 4. Department of Health Policy and Management, University of California at Los Angeles Fielding School of Public Health, Los Angeles, California. 5. University of California at Los Angeles School of Nursing, Los Angeles, California. 6. Department of Urology, Weill Cornell School of Medicine, New York, New York.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Beyond age and comorbidity, functionality can shape the long-term survival potential of patients with cancer. Accordingly, herein the authors compared mortality and receipt of cancer-directed surgery according to patient function among older adults with kidney cancer. METHODS: Using Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER)-Medicare data from 2000 through 2009, the authors studied 28,326 elderly subjects with primary kidney cancer. Patient function was quantified using function-related indicators, claims indicative of dysfunction and disability. Adjusting for patient and cancer characteristics, competing risk regression was used to assess the relationship between function-related indicator count and cause-specific mortality and then generalized estimating equations were used to quantify the probability of surgery. RESULTS: A total of 13,619 adult patients (48.1%) with at least 1 function-related indicator were identified. A higher indicator category was associated with older age, greater comorbidity, female sex, unmarried status, lower socioeconomic status, and higher stage of disease (P<.001). Compared with patients with an indicator count of 0, those with an indicator count of 1 (hazard ratio, 1.10; 95% confidence interval [95% CI], 1.04-1.16) and ≥2 (hazard ratio, 1.46; 95% CI, 1.39-1.53) were found to have higher other-cause mortality. Conversely, kidney cancer mortality varied minimally with patient function. Patients with ≥ 2 indicators received cancer-directed surgery less often than those without disability (odds ratio, 0.61; 95% CI, 0.56-0.66), although treatment probabilities remained high for patients with locoregional disease and low for those with metastatic cancer. CONCLUSIONS: Among older adults with kidney cancer, functional health stands as a significant predictor of long-term survival. However, receipt of cancer-directed surgery appears largely determined by cancer stage. Patient function should be considered more heavily when determining treatment for older adults with kidney cancer. Cancer 2016;122:3776-3784.
BACKGROUND: Beyond age and comorbidity, functionality can shape the long-term survival potential of patients with cancer. Accordingly, herein the authors compared mortality and receipt of cancer-directed surgery according to patient function among older adults with kidney cancer. METHODS: Using Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER)-Medicare data from 2000 through 2009, the authors studied 28,326 elderly subjects with primary kidney cancer. Patient function was quantified using function-related indicators, claims indicative of dysfunction and disability. Adjusting for patient and cancer characteristics, competing risk regression was used to assess the relationship between function-related indicator count and cause-specific mortality and then generalized estimating equations were used to quantify the probability of surgery. RESULTS: A total of 13,619 adult patients (48.1%) with at least 1 function-related indicator were identified. A higher indicator category was associated with older age, greater comorbidity, female sex, unmarried status, lower socioeconomic status, and higher stage of disease (P<.001). Compared with patients with an indicator count of 0, those with an indicator count of 1 (hazard ratio, 1.10; 95% confidence interval [95% CI], 1.04-1.16) and ≥2 (hazard ratio, 1.46; 95% CI, 1.39-1.53) were found to have higher other-cause mortality. Conversely, kidney cancer mortality varied minimally with patient function. Patients with ≥ 2 indicators received cancer-directed surgery less often than those without disability (odds ratio, 0.61; 95% CI, 0.56-0.66), although treatment probabilities remained high for patients with locoregional disease and low for those with metastatic cancer. CONCLUSIONS: Among older adults with kidney cancer, functional health stands as a significant predictor of long-term survival. However, receipt of cancer-directed surgery appears largely determined by cancer stage. Patient function should be considered more heavily when determining treatment for older adults with kidney cancer. Cancer 2016;122:3776-3784.
Authors: Arti Hurria; Kayo Togawa; Supriya G Mohile; Cynthia Owusu; Heidi D Klepin; Cary P Gross; Stuart M Lichtman; Ajeet Gajra; Smita Bhatia; Vani Katheria; Shira Klapper; Kurt Hansen; Rupal Ramani; Mark Lachs; F Lennie Wong; William P Tew Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 2011-08-01 Impact factor: 44.544
Authors: Elizabeth Chrischilles; Kathleen Schneider; June Wilwert; Gregory Lessman; Brian O'Donnell; Brian Gryzlak; Kara Wright; Robert Wallace Journal: Med Care Date: 2014-03 Impact factor: 2.983
Authors: G Freyer; J-F Geay; S Touzet; J Provencal; B Weber; J-P Jacquin; G Ganem; N Tubiana-Mathieu; O Gisserot; E Pujade-Lauraine Journal: Ann Oncol Date: 2005-08-10 Impact factor: 32.976
Authors: Amy J Davidoff; Ilene H Zuckerman; Naimish Pandya; Franklin Hendrick; Xuehua Ke; Arti Hurria; Stuart M Lichtman; Arif Hussain; Jonathan P Weiner; Martin J Edelman Journal: J Geriatr Oncol Date: 2013-04 Impact factor: 3.599
Authors: Bruce L Jacobs; Hung-Jui Tan; Jeffrey S Montgomery; Alon Z Weizer; David P Wood; David C Miller; J Stuart Wolf; Khaled S Hafez Journal: Urology Date: 2012-05 Impact factor: 2.649
Authors: Daniel Y C Heng; J Connor Wells; Brian I Rini; Benoit Beuselinck; Jae-Lyun Lee; Jennifer J Knox; Georg A Bjarnason; Sumanta Kumar Pal; Christian K Kollmannsberger; Takeshi Yuasa; Sandy Srinivas; Frede Donskov; Aristotelis Bamias; Lori A Wood; D Scott Ernst; Neeraj Agarwal; Ulka N Vaishampayan; Sun Young Rha; Jenny J Kim; Toni K Choueiri Journal: Eur Urol Date: 2014-06-13 Impact factor: 20.096
Authors: Melisa L Wong; Stuart M Lichtman; Gary R Morrow; John Simmons; Tomma Hargraves; Cary P Gross; Jennifer L Lund; Lisa M Lowenstein; Louise C Walter; Cara L McDermott; Supriya G Mohile; Harvey Jay Cohen Journal: J Geriatr Oncol Date: 2019-07-17 Impact factor: 3.599
Authors: Mayra Tisminetzky; Jerry H Gurwitz; Dongjie Fan; Kristi Reynolds; David H Smith; Hassan Fouayzi; Sue Hee Sung; Robert Goldberg; Alan S Go Journal: J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci Date: 2020-09-25 Impact factor: 6.053
Authors: Sophie E Mayer; Hung-Jui Tan; Sharon Peacock Hinton; Hanna K Sanoff; Til Stürmer; Laura L Hester; Keturah R Faurot; Michele Jonsson Funk; Jennifer L Lund Journal: Med Care Date: 2019-04 Impact factor: 3.178