Literature DB >> 27517300

Human Leukocyte Antigen G Polymorphism and Expression Are Associated with an Increased Risk of Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer and Advanced Disease Stage.

Amira Ben Amor1, Karine Beauchemin2, Marie-Claude Faucher2, Agnes Hamzaoui1,3, Kamel Hamzaoui1,3, Michel Roger2,4.   

Abstract

Human leukocyte antigen (HLA)-G acts as negative regulator of the immune responses and its expression may enable tumor cells to escape immunosurveillance. The purpose of this study was to investigate the influence of HLA-G allelic variants and serum soluble HLA-G (sHLA-G) levels on risk of non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). We analyzed 191 Caucasian adults with NSCLC and 191 healthy subjects recruited between January 2009 and March 2014 in Ariana (Tunisia). Serum sHLA-G levels were measured by immunoassay and HLA-G alleles were determined using a direct DNA sequencing procedures. The heterozygous genotypes of HLA-G 010101 and -G 010401 were associated with increased risks of both NSCLC and advanced disease stages. In contrast, the heterozygous genotypes of HLA-G 0105N and -G 0106 were associated with decreased risks of NSCC and clinical disease stage IV, respectively. Serum sHLA-G levels were significantly higher in patients with NSCLC and particularly in those with advanced disease stages compared to healthy subjects. The area under the receiver-operating characteristic (ROC) curves was 0.82 for controls vs patients. Given 100% specificity, the highest sensitivity achieved to detect NSCLC was 52.8% at a cutoff value of 24.9 U/ml. Patients with the sHLA-G above median level (≥ 50 U/ml) had a significantly shorter survival time. This study demonstrates that HLA-G allelic variants are independent risk factors for NSCLC. Serum sHLA-G levels in NSCLC patients could be useful biomarkers for the diagnostic and prognosis of NSCLC.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27517300      PMCID: PMC4982692          DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0161210

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  PLoS One        ISSN: 1932-6203            Impact factor:   3.240


Introduction

Lung cancer is the most common malignancy and the leading cause of cancer mortality in the world [1,2]. The poor prognosis of lung cancer is largely due to the lack of symptoms until advanced stages, and screening tools that allow detection of early-stage tumors [3]. Thus, the investigation of appropriate tumor biomarkers for early detection is necessary for improved prognosis and a better survival rate. The host immune system plays a crucial role in the detection and elimination of cancer cells by a process called the cancer immune surveillance [4]. During immune editing, tumor cells have developed different mechanisms to escape from this elimination [5,6]. HLA-G is a non-classical HLA class I molecule whose aberrant expression in a wide variety of cancers has been suggested as a mechanism by which tumour cells can escape immunosurveillance [7]. HLA-G acts as negative regulator of the immune response through several mechanisms including preventing antigen recognition and T-cell migration, and suppression of T and natural killer (NK) cells cytotoxic effects [7,8]. Aberrant HLA-G expression has been observed in lung cancer tissue [9-11] and relatively high blood soluble HLA-G (sHLA-G) levels have been associated with lung cancer and advanced clinical disease stages [12-14]. HLA-G exhibits low polymorphism with only 51 alleles described so far and HLA-G expression can be modulated by allelic variants [8]. HLA-G alleles have been reported to be associated with the risk of various types of tumors, including hepatocellular, esophageal, bladder, uterine cervical, childhood neuroblastoma and breast cancers [15-19]. However, the link between HLA-G alleles and lung cancer has not yet been studied. It remains to be elucidated whether the expression of HLA-G in the context of lung cancer depends on the grade/type of tumor or genetic background of patients or both.

Materials and Methods

The study population

A total of 191 Caucasian adults admitted to Abderrahmen Mami Hospital (Ariana, Tunisia) and diagnosed with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) were collected between January 2009 and March 2014. Histological diagnosis and tumor stage were determined for all patients in accordance with the World Health Organization criteria and the TNM staging system of international union against cancer. The collection of samples was performed before patients begin their treatment. 191 controls subjects were selected from healthy blood volunteers’ donors, recruited from the National blood transfusion center of Tunisia at the same period. These controls were unrelated to patients with malignancies, and none had a personal history of malignancy at time of ascertainment. Written informed consent was obtained from each individual and the study was approved by the Institutional Ethics Committee of Abderrahmen Mami Hospital.

Soluble HLA-G measurements and HLA-G genotyping

sHLA-G serum levels were measured using a sHLA-G Elisa kit (Exbio), which allows simultaneous detection of HLA-G1 and -G5 soluble proteins without discrimination. HLA-G alleles were determined by direct DNA sequencing analysis of the nucleotide regions encompassing exons 2–4 using purified DNA from blood samples as described previously [20].

Statistical analysis

All analyses were performed using the Graph Pad PRISM 5.0 for Windows and Epi-Info statistical program 7.0. Participants were classified according to the disease status and descriptive statistics were used to describe pertinent variables. In order to assess the association between each of the HLA-G alleles with NSCLC or disease status, those subjects who were heterozygous and homozygous were compared separately with subjects who tested negatively for that allele. The association between each of the putative HLA-G alleles and risks of NSCLC and disease progression was investigated using adjusted multivariate logistic regression to derive odds ratios (ORs) and respective 95% confidence intervals (CI) as estimates of relative risks. Since control and patient groups were similar for age, gender and ethnicity, the models were adjusted only for smoking status. The analyses were restricted to those HLA-G alleles found at a frequency above 5% in the study population. Overall patient survival was defined as the time from the date of diagnosis to the date of last follow-up (censored) or date of patient death by any cause (event). Survival probabilities were calculated using the Kaplan–Meier method. The comparison of the survival curves was carried out using the Log-rank test. The feasibility of using sHLA-G in serum as a potential biomarker for differentiating NSCLC patients from normal controls was assessed using the receiver-operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis. P-values less than 0.05 were considered statistically significant in all analyses.

Results

Characteristic of the study population

The distribution of demographic and smoking status variables by disease status are outlined in Table 1. The study groups were similar with respect to age and gender. The average age of cases and controls was 58.7 and 54.1 years, respectively. The majority (89%) of both cases and controls were men. Smoking status was significantly different between groups. Most cases (90.6%) and less than half of controls (43.5%) were former or current smokers. Most of the cases (55.5%) had adenocarcinoma followed by squamous cell carcinoma (29.9%) and large cell carcinoma (14.6%), and 90% of patients had advanced disease stages (stages III and IV).
Table 1

Characteristics of cases and controls according to disease status.

CategoryControlsNSCLStage I-IIStage IIIStage IV
N (%)19119118 (9.4)59 (30.9)114 (59.7)
Age
Mean±SD (years)54.1 ± 6.758.7 ± 10.757.8 ± 11.861.3 ± 10.557.6 ± 10.3
<5044 (23.0)39 (20.4)6 (33.3)7 (11.86)26 (22.8)
≥50147 (77.0)152 (79.6)12 (66.7)52 (88.13)88 (77.2)
Gender
Male171 (89.5)169 (88.5)13 (72.2)55 (93.2)101 (88.6)
Female20 (10.5)22 (11.5)5 (27.8)4 (6.8)13 (11.4)
Smoking status
Never108 (56.5)18 (9.4)2 (11.1)3 (5.1)13 (11.4)
Former/current83 (43.5)173 (90.6)16 (88.9)56 (94.9)101 (88.6)

N: number; NSCLC: none small cell lung carcinoma; SD: standard deviation. P< 0.0001 between controls and all other categories for smoking status, P > 0.05 between controls and all other categories for age and gender calculated by Fisher’s exact test.

N: number; NSCLC: none small cell lung carcinoma; SD: standard deviation. P< 0.0001 between controls and all other categories for smoking status, P > 0.05 between controls and all other categories for age and gender calculated by Fisher’s exact test.

Prevalence of HLA-G genotypes

Eleven HLA-G alleles were found in the study population. The wild-type HLA-G*01:01:01 was the most prevalent allele (33.2%) among the controls, followed by G*01:01:02 (21.2%), G*01:03:01 (11.5%), G*01:04:04 (10.7%), G*01:06 (9.4%), G*01:05N (5.5%), G*01:04:01 (3.9%), G*01:01:03 (1.6%), G*01:01:12 (1.6%), G*01:01:14 (1.1%), and G*01:01:17 (0.3%).

HLA-G genotypes distribution and association with NSCLC and disease stages

Table 2 shows the distribution of the HLA-G genotypes by disease status while Table 3 shows the adjusted ORs and 95% CIs for the associations between HLA-G genotypes and NSCLC and disease stages for those with allele frequency of 5% or more. Some HLA-G genotypes were associated with altered risks of both NSCLC and advanced disease stages. The heterozygous genotypes of HLA-G*01:01:01 and G*01:04:01 were significantly associated with increased risks of both NSCLC (P = 0.029, P = 0.046, respectively) and advanced disease stages (P = 0.038, P = 0.030, respectively). In contrast, the heterozygous genotypes of HLA-G*01:05N and G*01:06 were associated with a decreased risks of NSCC (P = 0.044) and clinical disease stage IV (P = 0.005), respectively. S1 and S2 Tables show the distribution and the adjusted ORs (95% CIs) for the associations between HLA-G genotypes and histological types, respectively. The heterozygous genotypes of HLA-G*01:01:01 and G*01:04:01 were associated with increased risks for all histopathological types reaching significant level for the adenocarcinoma lung cancer type which affected 55% of the patients of the present study. The heterozygous genotypes of HLA-G*01:05N and G*01:06 were associated with decreased risks for all histological types but levels were not significant when analyzed separately. The lack of significant associations found when cases are dichotomized by the different histopathological types or clinical disease stages is presumably due to the relatively low number of patients per subgroups of histological types or disease clinical stages. This lack of sufficient power becomes more important with low prevalent alleles such as HLA-G*01:05N and G*01:06.
Table 2

Distribution of selected HLA-G genotypes by disease status.

GenotypesControlsNSCLCStage I-IIStage IIIStage IV
N (%)19119118 (9.4)59 (30.9)114 (59.7)
010101
Homozygote26 (13.6)17 (8.9)3 (16.7)5 (8.5)9 (7.9)
Heterozygote75 (39.3)110 (57.6)9 (50.035 (59.3)66 (57.9)
Absent90 (47.1)64 (33.5)6 (33.3)19 (32.2)39 (34.2)
010102
Homozygote5 (2.6)7 (3.7)1 (5.6)0 (0.0)6 (5.3)
Heterozygote71 (37.2)46 (24.0)3 (16.7)15 (25.5)28 (24.6)
Absent115 (60.2)138 (72.3)14 (77.8)44 (74.5)80 (70.1)
010301
Homozygote5 (2.6)1 (0.5)0 (0.0)1 (1.7)0 (0.0)
Heterozygote34 (17.8)44 (23.1)5 (27.8)11 (18.6)28 (24.6)
Absent152 (79.6)146 (76.4)13 (72.2)47 (79.7)86 (75.4
010401
Homozygote0 (0.0)1 (0.5)0 (0.0)0 (0.0)1 (0.9)
Heterozygote15 (7.9)31 (16.2)2 (11.1)11 (18.6)18 (15.8)
Absent176 (92.1)159 (83.3)16 (88.9)48 (81.4)95 (83.3)
010404
Homozygote6 (3.1)0 (0.0)0 (0.0)0 (0.0)0 (0.0)
Heterozygote29 (15.2)24 (12.7)2 (11.1)4 (6.8)18 (15.8)
Absent156 (81.7)167 (87.3)16 (88.9)55 (93.2)96 (84.2)
0105N
Homozygote0 (0.0)0 (0.0)0 (0.0)0 (0.0)0 (0.0)
Heterozygote21 (12.0)12 (6.3)0 (0.0)3 (5.1)9 (7.9)
Absent170 (98.0)179 (93.7)18 (100)56 (94.9)105 (92.1)
0106
Homozygote0 (0.0)14 (7.1)2 (11.1)5 (8.5)7 (6.1)
Heterozygote36 (18.8)22 (11.7)2 (11.1)14 (23.7)6 (5.3)
Absent155 (81.2)155 (81.2)14 (77.8)40 (67.8)101 (88.6)

N: number, NSCLC: none small cell lung carcinoma. Selected HLA-G genotypes are those with a frequency above 5% in the study population

Table 3

Adjusted OR (CI) for the associations between selected HLA-G genotypes and lung cancer and disease stages.

GenotypesNSCLCStage I-IIStage IIIStage IV
010101
Homozygote0.84 [0.39–1.81]1.68 [0.38–7.50]0.81 [0.26–2.56]0.74 [0.73–1.18]
Heterozygote1.74 [1.05–2.88]1.69 [0.55–5.21]2.04 [1.01–4.15]1.81 [1.03–3.16]
Absent1.01.01.01.0
010102
Homozygote1.39 [0.35–5.60]3.00 [0.29–38.8]n.a2.06 [0.50–8.54]
Heterozygote0.61 [0.37–1.02]0.41 [0.30–1.52]0.62 [0.30–1.28]0.65 [0.36–1.15]
Absent1.01.01.01.0
010301
Homozygoten.an.a0.48 [0.05–4.76]n.a
Heterozygote1.65 [0.90–3.0]1.84 [0.58–5.87]1.15 [0.15–2.70]1.87 [0.97–3.60]
Absent1.01.01.01.0
010401
Homozygoten.an.an.an.a
Heterozygote2.24 [1.04–4.81]1.52 [0.29–7.89]3.10 [1.11–8.52]2.14 [0.93–4.94]
Absent1.01.01.01.0
010404
Homozygoten.an.an.an.a
Heterozygote0.92 [0.46–1.88]0.94 [0.19–4.68]0.52 [0.16–1.72]1.33 [0.74–2.78]
Absent1.01.01.01.0
0105N
Homozygoten.an.an.an.a
Heterozygote0.43 [0.19–0.98]n.a0.36 [0.10–1.34]0.56 [0.23–1.36]
Absent1.01.01.01.0
0106
Homozygoten.an.an.an.a
Heterozygote0.57 [0.29–1.09]0.59 [0.12–2.84]2.38 [0.32–1.56]0.25 [0.10–0.66]
Absent1.01.01.01.0

CI, confidence interval; N.A: none applicable; NSCLC: none small cell lung carcinoma; OR, Odds ratio. Selected HLA-G genotypes are those with a frequency above 5% in the study population. Adjusted ORs for smoking status

N: number, NSCLC: none small cell lung carcinoma. Selected HLA-G genotypes are those with a frequency above 5% in the study population CI, confidence interval; N.A: none applicable; NSCLC: none small cell lung carcinoma; OR, Odds ratio. Selected HLA-G genotypes are those with a frequency above 5% in the study population. Adjusted ORs for smoking status

sHLA-G serum levels in the study population

The mean serum level of sHLA-G in NSCLC patients (53.3 ± 4.6 U/ml) was significantly increased compared to that found in controls (8.36 ± 0.4 U/ml), P< 0.0001 (Fig 1). The mean serum level of sHLA-G was increased independently of the histopathological type (S1 Fig). Furthermore mean serum sHLA-G levels in stages III (39.5 ± 7.0 U/ml) and IV (67 ± 6.5 U/ml) were higher than that observed in controls (8.36 ± 0.4 U/ml), P< 0.0001 (Fig 1). We also evaluated the correlation between serum sHLA-G levels and various characteristics of patients. No significant differences were found between males and females (51.4 ± 4.8 vs 67.2 ± 16 U/ml, P = 0.27) or between age groups of <50 and ≥50 years old (55.9 ± 11 vs 52.5 ± 5.1 U/ml; P = 0.76). Also no significant differences was found between none smoker and smoker groups (41.3 ± 13 vs 54.5 ± 4.9 U/ml; P = 0.40).
Fig 1

Serum sHLA-G levels in healthy controls and non-small-cell lung carcinoma (NSCLC) patients with different clinical stages.

sHLA-G in all NSCLC patients and those with stages III and IV were significantly increased when compared to controls as determined by the Mann-Whitney U test (*** P< 0.0001).

Serum sHLA-G levels in healthy controls and non-small-cell lung carcinoma (NSCLC) patients with different clinical stages.

sHLA-G in all NSCLC patients and those with stages III and IV were significantly increased when compared to controls as determined by the Mann-Whitney U test (*** P< 0.0001). ROC curves were used to evaluate the performance of serum sHLA-G in detecting NSCLC. The area under the curves was 0.82 for controls vs patients (Fig 2A). Given 100% specificity, the highest sensitivity achieved to detect NSCLC was 52.8%, at a cutoff value of 24.9 U/ml. (P< 0.001, CI = 0.78–0.87). A total of 135 patients were available for a follow-up study. The follow up period was 50 months or until death. The median average follow-up for surviving patients was 23 months (range, 6–52 months), and during the entire period, there were 70 cancer-related deaths (51.9%). Patients with the sHLA-G above median level (≥ 50 U/ml) had a statistically significant shorter survival time than those with lower sHLA-G expression (P< 0.0001) (Fig 2B).
Fig 2

A. Receiver-operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis to assess the performance of sHLA-G levels in serum for differentiation between non-small-cell lung carcinoma (NSCLC) patients and healthy controls. The area under the ROC curve is 0.82 (P< 0.001). B. Kaplan–Meier survival analysis for NSCLC patients. Comparison of the overall survival between the patients with serum sHLA-G levels above and under the median (50 U/ml). (P< 0.0001).

A. Receiver-operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis to assess the performance of sHLA-G levels in serum for differentiation between non-small-cell lung carcinoma (NSCLC) patients and healthy controls. The area under the ROC curve is 0.82 (P< 0.001). B. Kaplan–Meier survival analysis for NSCLC patients. Comparison of the overall survival between the patients with serum sHLA-G levels above and under the median (50 U/ml). (P< 0.0001).

Discussion

The most common immune-escape mechanism in experimental or spontaneous tumors is the downregulation or lack of expression of classical HLA class I molecules (HLA-A and -B), which directly affects cytotoxic T cell function against tumor cells [7]. In the absence of classical HLA class I molecules, NK cells become the major actors for tumor elimination. The microenvironment of the tumor or the transformed cells per se may induce HLA-G expression, impairing the activity of NK cells [21]. In addition, HLA-G molecules can be transferred by trogocytosis to competent cytotoxic cells rendering them unresponsive to tumor antigens [22]. Previous studies have demonstrated HLA-G expression in lung cancer tissue [9-11] and relatively high blood sHLA-G levels in patients with NSCLC [12-14]. Two recent studies in Polish patients have found no significant correlations between NSCLC and four polymorphisms in the promoter and/or 3’untranslated region (3’UTR) of HLA-G gene [23,24]. However, to date no study has looked at the HLA-G allelic variants. Herein, we report that both HLA-G alleles and serum sHLA-G levels are significantly associated with altered risks of NSCLC and clinical disease stages in Tunisians. The HLA-G*01:01:01 and G*01:04:01 alleles increased risks, whereas the HLA-G*01:05N and G*01:06 alleles conferred protection against both NSCLC and advanced disease stages. Moreover, in agreement with previous studies [12-14], serum sHLA-G levels were higher in patients with NSCLC and in particular those with advanced disease stages compared to healthy subjects. Interestingly, it has been previously shown that individuals carrying the HLA-G*01:04:01 allele have increased blood sHLA-G levels, whereas those harboring the HLA-G*0105N allele, which does not encode a functional HLA-G1 protein, have reduced blood sHLA-G levels [25]. This finding suggests that in the in context of NSCLC, expression of HLA-G is under the control of the genetic background of the patients. The ROC curve analyses were performed to evaluate the feasibility of sHLA-G as a diagnostic marker for NSCLC. Similarly to the study of Cao et all [13] this analysis suggests that the measurement of serum sHLA-G levels is a highly specific and sensitive method to identify NSCLC patients. Moreover, serum sHLA-G concentration above the median level (50 U/ml) in Tunisian NSCLC patients is associated with a shorter survival time. Similar findings have been reported in Chinese and German NSCLC patients with plasma sHLA-G levels above 32 U/ml and 40 U/ml, respectively [12-14]. In conclusion, this study demonstrates that HLA-G allelic variants are an independent risk factor for NSCLC in the Tunisian population. Serum sHLA-G levels in NSCLC patients could be useful biomarkers for the diagnostic and prognosis of NSCLC.

Distribution of selected HLA-G genotypes by disease status and histological types.

N: number, NSCC: none small cell carcinoma. Selected HLA-G genotypes are those with a frequency above 5% in the study population. (DOCX) Click here for additional data file.

Adjusted OR (CI) for the associations between selected HLA-G genotypes and histological types.

CI, confidence interval; N.A: none applicable; NSCC: none small cell carcinoma OR, Odds ratio. Selected HLA-G genotypes are those with a frequency above 5% in the study population. Adjusted ORs for smoking status (DOCX) Click here for additional data file.

Serum sHLA-G levels in healthy controls and non-small-cell lung carcinoma (NSCLC) patients with different histopathological types.

sHLA-G in NSCLC patients with all histopathological types were significantly increased when compared to controls as determined by the Mann-Whitney U test (*** P< 0.0001). (DOCX) Click here for additional data file.
  24 in total

1.  Plasma soluble HLA-G is a potential biomarker for diagnosis of colorectal, gastric, esophageal and lung cancer.

Authors:  M Cao; S-M Yie; J Liu; S R Ye; D Xia; E Gao
Journal:  Tissue Antigens       Date:  2011-08

Review 2.  HLA-G and immune evasion in cancer cells.

Authors:  Jim Sheu; Ie-Ming Shih
Journal:  J Formos Med Assoc       Date:  2010-04       Impact factor: 3.282

3.  Genetic polymorphisms and expression of HLA-G and its receptors, KIR2DL4 and LILRB1, in non-small cell lung cancer.

Authors:  A Wiśniewski; A Kowal; E Wyrodek; I Nowak; E Majorczyk; M Wagner; E Pawlak-Adamska; R Jankowska; B Ślesak; I Frydecka; P Kuśnierczyk
Journal:  Tissue Antigens       Date:  2015-04-09

4.  Relationship between HLA-G gene polymorphism and the susceptibility of esophageal cancer in Kazakh and Han nationality in Xinjiang.

Authors:  Yan Chen; Xiu-jing Gao; Yan-chao Deng; Hui-xia Zhang
Journal:  Biomarkers       Date:  2011-11-14       Impact factor: 2.658

5.  Human leukocyte antigen G polymorphism is associated with an increased risk of invasive cancer of the uterine cervix.

Authors:  Rhea Ferguson; Agnihotram V Ramanakumar; Anita Koushik; François Coutlée; Eduardo Franco; Michel Roger
Journal:  Int J Cancer       Date:  2012-01-03       Impact factor: 7.396

Review 6.  The immunobiology of cancer immunosurveillance and immunoediting.

Authors:  Gavin P Dunn; Lloyd J Old; Robert D Schreiber
Journal:  Immunity       Date:  2004-08       Impact factor: 31.745

7.  Cancer incidence and mortality worldwide: sources, methods and major patterns in GLOBOCAN 2012.

Authors:  Jacques Ferlay; Isabelle Soerjomataram; Rajesh Dikshit; Sultan Eser; Colin Mathers; Marise Rebelo; Donald Maxwell Parkin; David Forman; Freddie Bray
Journal:  Int J Cancer       Date:  2014-10-09       Impact factor: 7.396

Review 8.  Cancer immunoediting: integrating immunity's roles in cancer suppression and promotion.

Authors:  Robert D Schreiber; Lloyd J Old; Mark J Smyth
Journal:  Science       Date:  2011-03-25       Impact factor: 47.728

9.  Significance of tumour cell HLA-G5/-G6 isoform expression in discrimination for adenocarcinoma from squamous cell carcinoma in lung cancer patients.

Authors:  Wei-Hua Yan; Di Liu; Hai-Yan Lu; Ying-Ying Li; Xia Zhang; Aifen Lin
Journal:  J Cell Mol Med       Date:  2015-02-16       Impact factor: 5.310

10.  Human leukocyte antigen (HLA)-G gene polymorphism in patients with non-small cell lung cancer.

Authors:  Aneta Kowal; Andrzej Wiśniewski; Piotr Kuśnierczyk; Renata Jankowska
Journal:  Thorac Cancer       Date:  2015-02-28       Impact factor: 3.500

View more
  8 in total

1.  HLA-G 14bp Ins/Del Polymorphism, Plasma Level of Soluble HLA-G, and Association with IL-6/IL-10 Ratio and Survival of Glioma Patients.

Authors:  Maria Bucova; Kristina Kluckova; Jan Kozak; Boris Rychly; Magda Suchankova; Marian Svajdler; Viktor Matejcik; Juraj Steno; Eszter Zsemlye; Vladimira Durmanova
Journal:  Diagnostics (Basel)       Date:  2022-04-27

2.  Importance of the plasma soluble HLA-G levels for prognostic stratification with traditional prognosticators in colorectal cancer.

Authors:  Jing-Bo Li; Yan-Yun Ruan; Bin Hu; Shan-Shan Dong; Tie-Nan Bi; Aifen Lin; Wei-Hua Yan
Journal:  Oncotarget       Date:  2017-07-25

3.  Soluble HLA-G expression levels and HLA-G/irinotecan association in metastatic colorectal cancer treated with irinotecan-based strategy.

Authors:  Lucia Scarabel; Marica Garziera; Sara Fortuna; Fioretta Asaro; Giuseppe Toffoli; Silvano Geremia
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2020-05-29       Impact factor: 4.379

Review 4.  HLA-G/sHLA-G and HLA-G-Bearing Extracellular Vesicles in Cancers: Potential Role as Biomarkers.

Authors:  Peilong Li; Nan Wang; Yi Zhang; Chuanxin Wang; Lutao Du
Journal:  Front Immunol       Date:  2021-11-11       Impact factor: 7.561

Review 5.  HLA-G and single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) associations with cancer in African populations: Implications in personal medicine.

Authors:  Ismael Chatita Adolf; Amany Almars; Nazima Dharsee; Teddy Mselle; Gokce Akan; Irene Jeremiah Nguma; Abdolrahman S Nateri; Fatmahan Atalar
Journal:  Genes Dis       Date:  2021-06-30

6.  Predicting the most deleterious missense nsSNPs of the protein isoforms of the human HLA-G gene and in silico evaluation of their structural and functional consequences.

Authors:  Elaheh Emadi; Fatemeh Akhoundi; Seyed Mehdi Kalantar; Modjtaba Emadi-Baygi
Journal:  BMC Genet       Date:  2020-08-31       Impact factor: 2.797

7.  HLA-G peptide preferences change in transformed cells: impact on the binding motif.

Authors:  Alexander A Celik; Gwendolin S Simper; Wiebke Hiemisch; Rainer Blasczyk; Christina Bade-Döding
Journal:  Immunogenetics       Date:  2018-03-30       Impact factor: 2.846

8.  The microRNA-152/human leukocyte antigen-G axis affects proliferation and immune escape of non-small cell lung cancer cells.

Authors:  Jun Fu; Jun Mao; Chun Wang
Journal:  J Int Med Res       Date:  2020-11       Impact factor: 1.671

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.