Literature DB >> 27515569

Combined tomography and epithelial thickness mapping for diagnosis of keratoconus.

Ronald H Silverman1,2, Raksha Urs1, Arindam RoyChoudhury3, Timothy J Archer4, Marine Gobbe4, Dan Z Reinstein1,4,5.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: Scanning Scheimpflug provides information regarding corneal thickness and 2-surface topography while arc-scanned high-frequency ultrasound allows depiction of the epithelial and stromal thickness distributions. Both techniques are useful in detection of keratoconus. Our aim was to develop and test a keratoconus classifier combining information from both methods.
METHODS: We scanned 111 normal and 30 clinical keratoconus subjects with Artemis-1 and Pentacam data. After selecting one random eye per subject, we performed stepwise linear discriminant analysis on a dataset combining parameters generated by each method to obtain classification models based on each technique alone and in combination.
RESULTS: Discriminant analysis resulted in a 4-variable model (R2 = 0.740) based on Artemis data alone and a 4-variable model (R2 = 0.734) using Pentacam data alone. The combined model (R2 = 0.828) consisted of 3 Artemis- and 4 Pentacam-derived variables. The combined model R value was significantly higher than either model alone (p = 0.031, one-tailed). In cross-validation, Artemis had 100% sensitivity and 99.2% specificity, Pentacam had 97.3% sensitivity and 98.0% specificity, and the combined model had 97.3% sensitivity and 100% specificity.
CONCLUSIONS: Pentacam, Artemis, and combined models were all effective in distinguishing normal from clinical keratoconus subjects. From the standpoint of variance explained by the model (R2 values), the combined model was most effective. Application of the model to early and subclinical keratoconus will ultimately be required to assess the effectiveness of the combined approach.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27515569      PMCID: PMC5299092          DOI: 10.5301/ejo.5000850

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur J Ophthalmol        ISSN: 1120-6721            Impact factor:   2.597


  13 in total

1.  Very high-frequency ultrasound corneal analysis identifies anatomic correlates of optical complications of lamellar refractive surgery: anatomic diagnosis in lamellar surgery.

Authors:  D Z Reinstein; R H Silverman; H F Sutton; D J Coleman
Journal:  Ophthalmology       Date:  1999-03       Impact factor: 12.079

2.  A new method for grading the severity of keratoconus: the Keratoconus Severity Score (KSS).

Authors:  Timothy T McMahon; Loretta Szczotka-Flynn; Joseph T Barr; Robert J Anderson; Mary E Slaughter; Jonathan H Lass; Sudha K Iyengar
Journal:  Cornea       Date:  2006-08       Impact factor: 2.651

3.  Corneal-thickness spatial profile and corneal-volume distribution: tomographic indices to detect keratoconus.

Authors:  Renato Ambrósio; Ruiz Simonato Alonso; Allan Luz; Luis Guillermo Coca Velarde
Journal:  J Cataract Refract Surg       Date:  2006-11       Impact factor: 3.351

4.  Corneal epithelial thickness profile in the diagnosis of keratoconus.

Authors:  Dan Z Reinstein; Timothy J Archer; Marine Gobbe
Journal:  J Refract Surg       Date:  2009-07       Impact factor: 3.573

5.  Evaluation of corneal shape and biomechanics before LASIK.

Authors:  Renato Ambrósio; Leonardo P Nogueira; Diogo L Caldas; Bruno M Fontes; Allan Luz; Jorge O Cazal; Milton Ruiz Alves; Michael W Belin
Journal:  Int Ophthalmol Clin       Date:  2011

6.  Novel pachymetric parameters based on corneal tomography for diagnosing keratoconus.

Authors:  Renato Ambrósio; Ana Laura C Caiado; Frederico P Guerra; Ricardo Louzada; Roy A Sinha; Allan Luz; William J Dupps; Michael W Belin
Journal:  J Refract Surg       Date:  2011-07-29       Impact factor: 3.573

7.  Epithelial remodeling as basis for machine-based identification of keratoconus.

Authors:  Ronald H Silverman; Raksha Urs; Arindam Roychoudhury; Timothy J Archer; Marine Gobbe; Dan Z Reinstein
Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci       Date:  2014-03-13       Impact factor: 4.799

8.  Epithelial, stromal, and total corneal thickness in keratoconus: three-dimensional display with artemis very-high frequency digital ultrasound.

Authors:  Dan Z Reinstein; Marine Gobbe; Timothy J Archer; Ronald H Silverman; D Jackson Coleman
Journal:  J Refract Surg       Date:  2010-04-07       Impact factor: 3.573

9.  SD-OCT analysis of regional epithelial thickness profiles in keratoconus, postoperative corneal ectasia, and normal eyes.

Authors:  Karolinne Maia Rocha; Claudia E Perez-Straziota; E Perez-Straziota; R Doyle Stulting; J Bradley Randleman
Journal:  J Refract Surg       Date:  2013-03       Impact factor: 3.573

10.  Keratoconus diagnosis with optical coherence tomography–based pachymetric scoring system.

Authors:  Bing Qin; Shihao Chen; Robert Brass; Yan Li; Maolong Tang; Xinbo Zhang; Xiaoyu Wang; Qinmei Wang; David Huang
Journal:  J Cataract Refract Surg       Date:  2013-12       Impact factor: 3.351

View more
  7 in total

1.  Distinguishing Highly Asymmetric Keratoconus Eyes Using Combined Scheimpflug and Spectral-Domain OCT Analysis.

Authors:  Eric S Hwang; Claudia E Perez-Straziota; Sang Woo Kim; Marcony R Santhiago; J Bradley Randleman
Journal:  Ophthalmology       Date:  2018-07-25       Impact factor: 12.079

2.  [Corneal epithelial thickness in keratoconus patients compared to healthy controls].

Authors:  Larissa Lahme; Jens Julian Storp; Raphael Diener; Nicole Eter; Uwe Hansen; Martin Dominik Leclaire; Maged Alnawaiseh
Journal:  Ophthalmologie       Date:  2022-04-01

3.  Histological Patterns of Epithelial Alterations in Keratoconus.

Authors:  Sara Crespo Millas; José Carlos López; Elena García-Lagarto; Estibaliz Obregón; Denise Hileeto; Miguel J Maldonado; J Carlos Pastor
Journal:  J Ophthalmol       Date:  2020-07-30       Impact factor: 1.909

Review 4.  Advances in Biomechanical Parameters for Screening of Refractive Surgery Candidates: A Review of the Literature, Part III.

Authors:  Majid Moshirfar; Mahsaw N Motlagh; Michael S Murri; Hamed Momeni-Moghaddam; Yasmyne C Ronquillo; Phillip C Hoopes
Journal:  Med Hypothesis Discov Innov Ophthalmol       Date:  2019

Review 5.  Accuracy of Machine Learning Assisted Detection of Keratoconus: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Authors:  Ke Cao; Karin Verspoor; Srujana Sahebjada; Paul N Baird
Journal:  J Clin Med       Date:  2022-01-18       Impact factor: 4.241

Review 6.  Biomechanical diagnostics of the cornea.

Authors:  Louise Pellegrino Gomes Esporcatte; Marcella Q Salomão; Bernardo T Lopes; Paolo Vinciguerra; Riccardo Vinciguerra; Cynthia Roberts; Ahmed Elsheikh; Daniel G Dawson; Renato Ambrósio
Journal:  Eye Vis (Lond)       Date:  2020-02-05

7.  EMKLAS: A New Automatic Scoring System for Early and Mild Keratoconus Detection.

Authors:  Jose S Velázquez-Blázquez; José M Bolarín; Francisco Cavas-Martínez; Jorge L Alió
Journal:  Transl Vis Sci Technol       Date:  2020-05-27       Impact factor: 3.283

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.