Literature DB >> 27515495

p16ink4 and cytokeratin 7 immunostaining in predicting HSIL outcome for low-grade squamous intraepithelial lesions: a case series, literature review and commentary.

Eric C Huang1, Mary M Tomic1, Suchanan Hanamornroongruang2, Emily E Meserve3, Michael Herfs4, Christopher P Crum3.   

Abstract

p16ink4 and cytokeratin 7 (CK7) have been proposed to identify low-grade squamous intraepithelial lesions (LSIL) at greater or lesser risk for an outcome of high-grade squamous intraepithelial lesion (HSIL). We correlated CK7 and p16ink4 staining in LSILs with outcome on follow-up and placed this information in the context of prior reports. Cervical LSIL biopsies with at least 1-year follow-up information were immunostained for CK7 and p16ink4. Follow-up outcomes included no SIL, LSIL (persistence) or HSIL (CIN2+). In all, 109 LSILs were studied and 18.3% stained positive for CK7. Ninety-one percent of CK7-negative LSILs regressed, 4.5% persisted, and 4.5% had an HSIL outcome, versus 60, 20, and 20% of CK7-positive LSILs, respectively (P=0.036). p16ink4 status did not significantly associate with outcome. Review of the literature revealed a highly variable rate of both positive p16ink4 immunoreactivity in LSIL and CIN2+ outcome for p16-positive LSIL but a consistently high negative predictive value (>90%) in the case of no/low p16 expression. Inter-observer reproducibility for the diagnosis of CIN2 in the literature ranged from poor to good, with unanimous agreement on the diagnosis of CIN2 occurring in less than 25% of cases. As with high-risk human papillomavirus testing, the most clinically useful result of p16ink4 staining is a negative test, implying no lesion or CIN1 and conferring a low risk of HSIL outcome. HSIL outcomes ('progression') are highly variable and are subject to wide differences in inter-observer interpretation for CIN2. This argues against the wisdom of relying on p16ink4 to both predict CIN2+ or upgrade CIN1 to CIN2. It also begs the question of whether CIN2 should be replaced by an alternate and less pejorative term (SIL of intermediate grade) for lesions that are not reproducibly classified as LSIL or HSIL, with an appropriate management scheme.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27515495     DOI: 10.1038/modpathol.2016.141

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Mod Pathol        ISSN: 0893-3952            Impact factor:   7.842


  41 in total

1.  Role of the Biomarker p16 in Downgrading -IN 2 Diagnoses and Predicting Higher-grade Lesions.

Authors:  Kruti P Maniar; Beatriz Sanchez; Ajit Paintal; Demirkan B Gursel; Ritu Nayar
Journal:  Am J Surg Pathol       Date:  2015-12       Impact factor: 6.394

2.  Regression of low-grade squamous intra-epithelial lesions in young women.

Authors:  Anna-Barbara Moscicki; Stephen Shiboski; Nancy K Hills; Kimberly J Powell; Naomi Jay; Evelyn N Hanson; Susanna Miller; K Lisa Canjura-Clayton; Sepidah Farhat; Jeanette M Broering; Teresa M Darragh
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2004 Nov 6-12       Impact factor: 79.321

3.  Rate of and risks for regression of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia 2 in adolescents and young women.

Authors:  Anna-Barbara Moscicki; Yifei Ma; Charles Wibbelsman; Teresa M Darragh; Adaleen Powers; Sepideh Farhat; Stephen Shiboski
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2010-12       Impact factor: 7.661

4.  Histological 'progression' from low (LSIL) to high (HSIL) squamous intraepithelial lesion is an uncommon event and an indication for quality assurance review.

Authors:  Eleanor Y Chen; Ann Tran; Caroline J Raho; Chandler M Birch; Christopher P Crum; Michelle S Hirsch
Journal:  Mod Pathol       Date:  2010-05-14       Impact factor: 7.842

5.  Follow-up study of patients with cervical intraepithelial neoplasia grade 1 overexpressing p16Ink4a.

Authors:  Stefania Cortecchia; Giuseppe Galanti; Cecilia Sgadari; Silvano Costa; Margherita De Lillo; Licia Caprara; Giovanni Barillari; Paolo Monini; Roberto Nannini; Barbara Ensoli; Lauro Bucchi
Journal:  Int J Gynecol Cancer       Date:  2013-11       Impact factor: 3.437

Review 6.  Redefining early cervical neoplasia: recent progress.

Authors:  Marisa R Nucci; Christopher P Crum
Journal:  Adv Anat Pathol       Date:  2007-01       Impact factor: 3.875

7.  Residual embryonic cells as precursors of a Barrett's-like metaplasia.

Authors:  Xia Wang; Hong Ouyang; Yusuke Yamamoto; Pooja Ashok Kumar; Tay Seok Wei; Rania Dagher; Matthew Vincent; Xin Lu; Andrew M Bellizzi; Khek Yu Ho; Christopher P Crum; Wa Xian; Frank McKeon
Journal:  Cell       Date:  2011-06-24       Impact factor: 41.582

8.  Assessment of correlation between p16INK4a staining, specific subtype of human papillomavirus, and progression of LSIL/CIN1 lesions: first comparative study.

Authors:  Maryam Razmpoosh; Andrée Sansregret; Luc L Oligny; Natalie Patey; Virginie Dormoy-Raclet; Thierry Ducruet; Dorothée Bouron-Dal Soglio
Journal:  Am J Clin Pathol       Date:  2014-07       Impact factor: 2.493

9.  p16INK4A immunohistochemical staining and predictive value for progression of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia grade 1: a prospective study in China.

Authors:  Guang-Dong Liao; John W Sellors; Hai-Kui Sun; Xun Zhang; Yan-Ping Bao; Jose Jeronimo; Wen Chen; Fang-Hui Zhao; Yan Song; Zhi Cao; Shao-Kai Zhang; Ming-Rong Xi; You-Lin Qiao
Journal:  Int J Cancer       Date:  2013-10-12       Impact factor: 7.396

10.  p16(INK4a) immunohistochemistry is a promising biomarker to predict the outcome of low grade cervical intraepithelial neoplasia: comparison study with HPV genotyping.

Authors:  Sakiko Nishio; Takuma Fujii; Hiroshi Nishio; Kaori Kameyama; Miyuki Saito; Takashi Iwata; Kaneyuki Kubushiro; Daisuke Aoki
Journal:  J Gynecol Oncol       Date:  2013-07-04       Impact factor: 4.401

View more
  9 in total

1.  Prognostic value of human papillomavirus 16/18 genotyping in low-grade cervical lesions preceded by mildly abnormal cytology.

Authors:  Jing Ye; Bei Cheng; Yi-Fan Cheng; Ye-Li Yao; Xing Xie; Wei-Guo Lu; Xiao-Dong Cheng
Journal:  J Zhejiang Univ Sci B       Date:  2017 Mar.       Impact factor: 3.066

Review 2.  Deciphering the Multifactorial Susceptibility of Mucosal Junction Cells to HPV Infection and Related Carcinogenesis.

Authors:  Michael Herfs; Thing R Soong; Philippe Delvenne; Christopher P Crum
Journal:  Viruses       Date:  2017-04-20       Impact factor: 5.048

3.  Colposcopic and Histological Outcome of Atypical Squamous Cells of Undetermined Significance and Atypical Squamous Cell of Undetermined Significance Cannot Exclude High-Grade in Women Screened for Cervical Cancer.

Authors:  Osman Ortashi; Dana Abdalla
Journal:  Asian Pac J Cancer Prev       Date:  2019-09-01

4.  Predictive Value of Pin1 in Cervical Low-Grade Squamous Intraepithelial Lesions and Inhibition of Pin1 Exerts Potent Anticancer Activity against Human Cervical Cancer.

Authors:  Yan-Tong Guo; Yan Lu; Yi-Yang Jia; Hui-Nan Qu; Da Qi; Xin-Qi Wang; Pei-Ye Song; Xiang-Shu Jin; Wen-Hong Xu; Yuan Dong; Ying-Ying Liang; Cheng-Shi Quan
Journal:  Aging Dis       Date:  2020-02-01       Impact factor: 6.745

5.  Pathologic discrepancies between colposcopy-directed biopsy and loop electrosurgical excision procedure of the uterine cervix in women with cytologic high-grade squamous intraepithelial lesions.

Authors:  Se Ik Kim; Se Jeong Kim; Dong Hoon Suh; Kidong Kim; Jae Hong No; Yong Beom Kim
Journal:  J Gynecol Oncol       Date:  2019-08-22       Impact factor: 4.401

Review 6.  Cervical Carcinoma: Oncobiology and Biomarkers.

Authors:  Larisa V Volkova; Alexander I Pashov; Nadezhda N Omelchuk
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2021-11-22       Impact factor: 5.923

Review 7.  Cytokeratin Expression Pattern in Human Endometrial Carcinomas and Lymph Nodes Micrometastasis: a Mini-review.

Authors:  Danuta Vasilevska; Vilius Rudaitis; Aneta Adamiak-Godlewska; Anna Semczuk-Sikora; Dorota Lewkowicz; Dominika Vasilevska; Andrzej Semczuk
Journal:  J Cancer       Date:  2022-03-14       Impact factor: 4.207

8.  Squamous intraepithelial lesions of the anal squamocolumnar junction: Histopathological classification and HPV genotyping.

Authors:  Omar Clavero; Jenny McCloskey; Vicente Marco Molina; Beatriz Quirós; Ignacio G Bravo; Silvia de Sanjosé; F Xavier Bosch; Ville N Pimenoff
Journal:  Papillomavirus Res       Date:  2016-12-09

9.  Prognostic value of HPV 16/18 genotyping and geminin mRNA quantification in low-grade cervical squamous intraepithelial lesion.

Authors:  Ziwen Zheng; Xiaorong Yang; Xinyu Yao; Ling Li
Journal:  Bioengineered       Date:  2021-12       Impact factor: 3.269

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.