Literature DB >> 26371784

Role of the Biomarker p16 in Downgrading -IN 2 Diagnoses and Predicting Higher-grade Lesions.

Kruti P Maniar1, Beatriz Sanchez, Ajit Paintal, Demirkan B Gursel, Ritu Nayar.   

Abstract

In 2012, the College of American Pathologists and American Society for Colposcopy and Cervical Pathology published the "LAST" recommendations for histopathology reporting of human papilloma virus-related squamous lesions of the lower anogenital tract, including the use of a 2-tier nomenclature (low-grade squamous intraepithelial lesion/high-grade squamous intraepithelial lesion [LSIL/HSIL]) and expanded use of the biomarker p16 to classify equivocal lesions as either precancer (HSIL) or low-grade lesions (LSIL)/non-human papilloma virus changes. We aimed to determine (1) the frequency with which the poorly reproducible diagnosis of intermediate-grade (-IN 2) lesion in the lower anogenital tract would be downgraded on the basis of p16 results, and (2) whether p16 status was predictive of subsequent higher-grade lesions. A total of 200 specimens diagnosed as an intermediate-grade (-IN 2) lesion of the cervix (168), vagina (2), vulva (2), and anus (28) were reviewed and immunostained for p16. Slides were independently reviewed by 2 pathologists, with discrepant p16 interpretations adjudicated by a third pathologist. Of the 200 cases, 32% were negative for p16. Among the 166 patients with subsequent pathology (including 131 excisions), 26.2% of p16-positive cases versus 4.4% of p16-negative cases were associated with a subsequent diagnosis of HSIL (-IN 3) or worse (P=0.002). Reproducibility of the biopsy diagnosis was fair, with no significant difference with the addition of p16 or using 2 versus 3 tiers. In 11.5% of cases, there was discordance in p16 interpretation (κ 0.735, good agreement). The results indicate that using the Lower Anogenital Squamous Terminology recommendations would result in approximately one third of equivocal (-IN 2) diagnoses being downgraded to LSIL over 1 year in a busy academic practice. The significant association of p16 expression with a higher risk for HSIL on a subsequent specimen suggests that use of p16 to adjudicate equivocal (-IN 2) diagnoses in lower anogenital tract specimens as either LSIL or HSIL would likely predict lesion grade more accurately and avoid unnecessary excisional procedures.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26371784     DOI: 10.1097/PAS.0000000000000494

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Surg Pathol        ISSN: 0147-5185            Impact factor:   6.394


  7 in total

Review 1.  [Interdisciplinary S2k guidelines on the diagnosis and treatment of vaginal carcinoma and its precursors-recommendations on surgical pathology for histopathological workup, diagnostics, and reporting].

Authors:  Lars-Christian Horn; Anne Kathrin Höhn; Monika Hampl; Grit Mehlhorn; Markus Follmann; Hans-Georg Schnürch
Journal:  Pathologe       Date:  2021-02       Impact factor: 1.011

2.  Possible role of negative human papillomavirus E6/E7 mRNA as a predictor of regression of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia 2 lesions in hr-HPV positive women.

Authors:  Maria Teresa Bruno; Nazario Cassaro; Salvatore Giovanni Vitale; Arianna Guaita; Sara Boemi
Journal:  Virol J       Date:  2022-05-27       Impact factor: 5.913

3.  Classifying Anal Intraepithelial Neoplasia 2 Based on LAST Recommendations.

Authors:  Yuxin Liu; W Glenn McCluggage; Teresa M Darragh; Wenxin Zheng; Jennifer M Roberts; Kay J Park; Pei Hui; Morgan Blakely; Keith Sigel; Michael M Gaisa
Journal:  Am J Clin Pathol       Date:  2021-05-18       Impact factor: 2.493

4.  Biomarker P16 predicts progression risk of anal low-grade squamous intraepithelial lesions.

Authors:  Yuxin Liu; Morgan Blakely; Keith Sigel; Tin Htwe Thin; Pei Hui; Michael Donovan; Michael M Gaisa
Journal:  AIDS       Date:  2018-10-23       Impact factor: 4.177

Review 5.  p16ink4 and cytokeratin 7 immunostaining in predicting HSIL outcome for low-grade squamous intraepithelial lesions: a case series, literature review and commentary.

Authors:  Eric C Huang; Mary M Tomic; Suchanan Hanamornroongruang; Emily E Meserve; Michael Herfs; Christopher P Crum
Journal:  Mod Pathol       Date:  2016-08-12       Impact factor: 7.842

6.  Analysis of factors affecting the prognosis of patients with cervical intraepithelial neoplasia 2.

Authors:  Xiaobo Zhang; Yougui Xu; Tianyu Meng; Danhua Shen
Journal:  Oncol Lett       Date:  2020-06-09       Impact factor: 2.967

7.  The value of Ki67 for the diagnosis of LSIL and the problems of p16 in the diagnosis of HSIL.

Authors:  Jixuan Liu; Sanmei Su; Yafang Liu
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2022-05-09       Impact factor: 4.996

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.