| Literature DB >> 27515430 |
Nandita Vijayakumar1,2, Cali Bartholomeusz1, Thomas Whitford3, Daniel F Hermens4, Barnaby Nelson1, Simon Rice1, Sarah Whittle5, Christos Pantelis5, Patrick McGorry1, Miriam R Schäfer1, G Paul Amminger6.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Schizophrenia is thought to be a neurodevelopmental disorder with pathophysiological processes beginning in the brain prior to the emergence of clinical symptoms. Recent evidence from neuroimaging studies using techniques such as diffusion tensor imaging has identified white matter abnormalities that are suggestive of disrupted brain myelination and neuronal connectivity. Identifying whether such effects exist in individuals at high risk for developing psychosis may help with prevention and early intervention strategies. In addition, there is preliminary evidence for a role of lipid biology in the onset of psychosis, along with well-established evidence of its role in myelination of white matter tracts. As such, this article synthesises the literature on polyunsaturated fatty acids (PUFAs) in myelination and schizophrenia, hypothesizing that white matter abnormalities may potentially mediate the relationship between PUFAs and schizophrenia.Entities:
Keywords: Polyunsaturated fatty acids; Psychosis; Ultra-high risk; White matter; Youth
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2016 PMID: 27515430 PMCID: PMC4982267 DOI: 10.1186/s12888-016-0932-4
Source DB: PubMed Journal: BMC Psychiatry ISSN: 1471-244X Impact factor: 3.630
Fig. 1PRISMA 2009 Flow Diagram
Diffusion tensor imaging studies on ultra-high risk samples
| Reference | Population | UHR assessment | DTI parametersa | Technique | Major Findings |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Bloemen et al., [ | 27 UHR-N (18 M, mean age = 18.9), 10 UHR-P (8 M, mean age = 20.7), 10 HC (8 M, mean age = 22.7) | SIPS | 3 T, EPI, 48 continuous 3 mm slices, 2x2x3mm | VBA, whole brain | UHR-P vs. HC: ↓ FA in bilateral medial frontal lobes. |
| UHR-P vs. UHR-N: ↓ FA lateral to right putamen and left superior temporal lobe,↑FA in left medial temporal lobe. | |||||
| Positive PANSS negatively correlated with FA in left medial temporal lobe in UHR-P group, and right superior temporal lobe in total UHR group. | |||||
| Carletti et a., [ | Baseline: 32 UHR (19 M, mean age = 23.4), 14 EOS (14 M, mean age = 25.9), 32 HC (27 M, mean age = 25.9) | CAARMS | 1.5 T, EPI, 60 contiguous 2.5 mm axial slices, 1.875x1.875x2.5 mm | VBA, whole brain | Baseline: FA was lowest in EOS, highest in HC and intermediate in UHR group. Clusters comprised in areas corresponding to CC, left ILF & SLF, left IFOF and cortico-subcortical pathways. |
| Follow-up: 22 UHR (5 UHR-P, 17 UHR-N) subjects (11 M, mean age = 26.6), 8 NC (17 M, mean age = 29.6) | Longitudinal UHR-P vs. UHR-N: ↓ FA over time in left frontal white matter, CC, SCR and SFOF. But no significant within group change. | ||||
| Bernard et al., [ | 26UHR (20 M, mean age = 18.5), 21 HC (15 M, mean age = 17.77) | SIPS | 3 T, EPI, GRAPPA parallel imaging factor 2, 72 slices, 2x2x2mm | TBSS, ROI = thalamic-hippocampal tract | UHR vs. HC: Significant group*time interaction. Controls FA ↑ over 12 months, while UHR FA ↓ over time (but no significant main effect of time). |
| Follow-up: 15UHR, 15 HC | |||||
| Clemm von Hohenberg et al., [ | 28 UHR (18 M, mean age = 20.6), 34 HC (18 F, mean age = 20.4) | SOPS | 3 T, EPI, 75 contiguous axial 2 mm slices, 2x2x2mm | TBSS, whole brain | UHR vs. HC: MD ↑ in several right hemisphere clusters (most notably SLF, posterior corona radiata, and CC). RD ↑ posterior parietal lobe. |
| Epstein et al. [ | 21 UHR (18 M, mean age = 16.1), 55 EOS (31 M, mean age = 16.9), 55 HC (27 M, mean age = 16.5), 31 cannabis use (non-psychotic, 22 M, mean age = 17.6). | SIPS | 3 T, EPI, 64 sagittal 2 mm slices, 2x2x2mm | Fiber tracking, ROIs = CB, SLF, CST, ILF, IFOF, and UF | EOS and UHR vs. HC and cannabis: FA ↓ bilateral CST |
| EOS and UHR vs. HC: FA ↓ left ILF and IFOF | |||||
| Karlsgodt et al., [ | 36 UHR (27 M, mean age = 17.0), 25 HC (12 M, mean age = 18.0) | SIPS | 1.5 T, EPI, 75 contiguous 2 mm AC-PC interleaved slices, 2x2x2mm | TBSS, ROIs = UF, AF, CB, ILF, MTL, ATR | UHR vs. HC: FA ↓ SLF at baseline. Did not increase FA with age in MTL and ILF. |
| FA ↓ MTL and ILF at baseline predicted reductions in functional outcomes in UHR. | |||||
| Katagiri et al., [ | 16HC (8 M, mean age = 23.2), 11 UHR-NN(3 M, mean age = 24.2), 23 UHR-NA (6 M, mean age = 23.4), 7 UHR-P (1 M, mean age = 20.7) | SIPS | 1.5 T, EPI, 30 axial slices, 1.02 × 1.02 × 5 mm | TBSS, whole brain for baseline analyses, followed by ROI (CC) for longitudinal analyses | Baseline: UHR vs. HC: ↓ FA in CC. Result also present in UHR-N vs. HC. Longitudinal: UHR-N improvements in positive symptoms at follow-up, which correlated with increased FA in the CC. |
| Follow-up: same groups as above | |||||
| Mittal et al., [ | 33UHR (20 M, mean age = 18.5), 35 HC (15 M, mean age = 17.77) | SIPS | 3 T, EPI, GRAPPA parallel imaging factor 2, 72 slices, 2x2x2mm | TBSS, ROI = SCP | UHR vs. HC: No group differences in baseline SCPs. Controls FA ↑ over 12 months, while UHR FA ↓ over time. |
| Follow-up: 15UHR, 15 HC | |||||
| Peters et al., [ | 10 UHR (mean age = 21.2), 10 EOS (mean age = 21.6) and 10 HC (mean age = 21.1). All male sample. | SIPS | 3 T, EPI, 48 continuous (para)transversal slices, 3x3.5x2.2 mm | Fiber tracking, ROIs = UF, AF, CB, CC | No group differences |
| Peters et al., [ | Same subjects as Peters et al. (2008) | SIPS | As above | VBA, whole brain | UHR vs. HC: FA ↓ bilateral superior and middle frontal |
| EOS vs. HC: FA ↓ bilateral temporal & parietal, and left frontal | |||||
| Peters et al., [ | 10 UHR-N (mean age = 21.2), 7 UHR-P (mean age = 22.6), 10 HC (mean age = 21.1). All male sample. | SIPS | As above | Fiber tracking, ROIs = UF, AF, CB, CC | No group differences |
| Petersson-Yeo et al., [ | 19 (12 M) pairs EOS (mean age = 24.37) vs. HC (mean age = 24.89) | CAARMS | 3 T, EPI, 60 contiguous axial 2.4 mm slices | TBSS, whole brain | FA differentiated UHR and EOS from HC. Pattern of findings were widely and diffusely spread, with no clear concentration of regions. |
| FA did not differentiate UHR and EOS. | |||||
| 19 (9 M) pairs UHR (mean age = 22.42) vs. HC (mean age = 23.32) | |||||
| 15 (9 M) pairs UHR (mean age = 23.2) vs. EOS (mean age = 23.2) |
aDTI parameters: field strength, acquisition technique, slice number/thickness/direction, voxel dimensions AC-PC: anterior commissure - posterior commissure; AF = arcuate fasiculus; ATR = anterior thalamic radiation; CAARMS: Comprehensive Assessment of At-Risk Mental States; CB = cingulate bundle; CC = corpus callosum; CST = cortiospinal tract; EOS = early onset schizophrenia; EPI: echo planar imaging; GRAPPA = generalized autocalibrating partially parallel acquisitions; HC = healthy controls; IFOF = inferior fronto-occipital fasiculus; ILF = inferior longitudinal fasiculus; ROI = region of interest; SCP = Superior cerebellar peduncle; SCR = superior corona radiata; SFOF = superior frontal occipital fasciculus; SIPS: Structured Interview for Prodromal Syndromes; SLF = superior longitudinal fasiculus; SOPS: Scale of Prodromal Symptoms; TBSS = tract based spatial statistics; UF = uncinate fasiculus; UHR = ultra high risk for schizophrenia; UHR-P = ultra-high risk subjects who transitioned to psychosis; UHR-N = ultra-high risk subjects who did not transition to psychosis; UHR-NA = ultra-high risk subjects who did not transition to psychosis and were prescribed antipsychotic mediation; UHR-NN = ultra-high risk subjects who did not transition to psychosis and were not prescribed antipsychotic mediation; VBA = voxel based analyses