Linden Parkes1, Tyler M Moore2, Monica E Calkins2, Matthew Cieslak3, David R Roalf2, Daniel H Wolf3, Ruben C Gur4, Raquel E Gur4, Theodore D Satterthwaite3, Danielle S Bassett5. 1. Department of Bioengineering, School of Engineering & Applied Science, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania. 2. Department of Psychiatry, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania; Lifespan Brain Institute, University of Pennsylvania & Children's Hospital of Philadelphia, Philadelphia. 3. Department of Psychiatry, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania; Lifespan Brain Institute, University of Pennsylvania & Children's Hospital of Philadelphia, Philadelphia; Center for Biomedical Image Computing and Analytics, Perelman School of Medicine, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania. 4. Department of Psychiatry, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania; Lifespan Brain Institute, University of Pennsylvania & Children's Hospital of Philadelphia, Philadelphia; Department of Neurology, Perelman School of Medicine, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania; Department of Radiology, Perelman School of Medicine, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania. 5. Department of Bioengineering, School of Engineering & Applied Science, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania; Department of Electrical & Systems Engineering, School of Engineering & Applied Science, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania; Department of Physics & Astronomy, College of Arts & Sciences, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania; Department of Psychiatry, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania; Department of Neurology, Perelman School of Medicine, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania; Santa Fe Institute, Santa Fe, New Mexico. Electronic address: dsb@seas.upenn.edu.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: The psychosis spectrum (PS) is associated with structural dysconnectivity concentrated in transmodal cortex. However, understanding of this pathophysiology has been limited by an overreliance on examining direct interregional connectivity. Using network control theory, we measured variation in both direct and indirect connectivity to a region to gain new insights into the pathophysiology of the PS. METHODS: We used psychosis symptom data and structural connectivity in 1068 individuals from the Philadelphia Neurodevelopmental Cohort. Applying a network control theory metric called average controllability, we estimated each brain region's capacity to leverage its direct and indirect structural connections to control linear brain dynamics. Using nonlinear regression, we determined the accuracy with which average controllability could predict PS symptoms in out-of-sample testing. We also examined the predictive performance of regional strength, which indexes only direct connections to a region, as well as several graph-theoretic measures of centrality that index indirect connectivity. Finally, we assessed how the prediction performance for PS symptoms varied over the functional hierarchy spanning unimodal to transmodal cortex. RESULTS: Average controllability outperformed all other connectivity features at predicting positive PS symptoms and was the only feature to yield above-chance predictive performance. Improved prediction for average controllability was concentrated in transmodal cortex, whereas prediction performance for strength was uniform across the cortex, suggesting that indexing indirect connections through average controllability is crucial in association cortex. CONCLUSIONS: Examining interindividual variation in direct and indirect structural connections to transmodal cortex is crucial for accurate prediction of positive PS symptoms.
BACKGROUND: The psychosis spectrum (PS) is associated with structural dysconnectivity concentrated in transmodal cortex. However, understanding of this pathophysiology has been limited by an overreliance on examining direct interregional connectivity. Using network control theory, we measured variation in both direct and indirect connectivity to a region to gain new insights into the pathophysiology of the PS. METHODS: We used psychosis symptom data and structural connectivity in 1068 individuals from the Philadelphia Neurodevelopmental Cohort. Applying a network control theory metric called average controllability, we estimated each brain region's capacity to leverage its direct and indirect structural connections to control linear brain dynamics. Using nonlinear regression, we determined the accuracy with which average controllability could predict PS symptoms in out-of-sample testing. We also examined the predictive performance of regional strength, which indexes only direct connections to a region, as well as several graph-theoretic measures of centrality that index indirect connectivity. Finally, we assessed how the prediction performance for PS symptoms varied over the functional hierarchy spanning unimodal to transmodal cortex. RESULTS: Average controllability outperformed all other connectivity features at predicting positive PS symptoms and was the only feature to yield above-chance predictive performance. Improved prediction for average controllability was concentrated in transmodal cortex, whereas prediction performance for strength was uniform across the cortex, suggesting that indexing indirect connections through average controllability is crucial in association cortex. CONCLUSIONS: Examining interindividual variation in direct and indirect structural connections to transmodal cortex is crucial for accurate prediction of positive PS symptoms.
Authors: Eli J Cornblath; Evelyn Tang; Graham L Baum; Tyler M Moore; Azeez Adebimpe; David R Roalf; Ruben C Gur; Raquel E Gur; Fabio Pasqualetti; Theodore D Satterthwaite; Danielle S Bassett Journal: Neuroimage Date: 2018-12-01 Impact factor: 6.556
Authors: Monica E Calkins; Tyler M Moore; Kathleen R Merikangas; Marcy Burstein; Theodore D Satterthwaite; Warren B Bilker; Kosha Ruparel; Rosetta Chiavacci; Daniel H Wolf; Frank Mentch; Haijun Qiu; John J Connolly; Patrick A Sleiman; Hakon Hakonarson; Ruben C Gur; Raquel E Gur Journal: World Psychiatry Date: 2014-10 Impact factor: 49.548
Authors: Sofie L Valk; Felix Hoffstaedter; Julia A Camilleri; Peter Kochunov; B T Thomas Yeo; Simon B Eickhoff Journal: Neuroimage Date: 2020-06-20 Impact factor: 7.400
Authors: Golia Shafiei; Ross D Markello; Reinder Vos de Wael; Boris C Bernhardt; Ben D Fulcher; Bratislav Misic Journal: Elife Date: 2020-12-17 Impact factor: 8.140
Authors: Janina Wilmskoetter; Xiaosong He; Lorenzo Caciagli; Jens H Jensen; Barbara Marebwa; Kathryn A Davis; Julius Fridriksson; Alexandra Basilakos; Lorelei P Johnson; Chris Rorden; Danielle Bassett; Leonardo Bonilha Journal: J Neurosci Date: 2021-12-06 Impact factor: 6.709
Authors: Adam R Pines; Bart Larsen; Zaixu Cui; Valerie J Sydnor; Maxwell A Bertolero; Azeez Adebimpe; Aaron F Alexander-Bloch; Christos Davatzikos; Damien A Fair; Ruben C Gur; Raquel E Gur; Hongming Li; Michael P Milham; Tyler M Moore; Kristin Murtha; Linden Parkes; Sharon L Thompson-Schill; Sheila Shanmugan; Russell T Shinohara; Sarah M Weinstein; Danielle S Bassett; Yong Fan; Theodore D Satterthwaite Journal: Nat Commun Date: 2022-05-12 Impact factor: 17.694
Authors: S Parker Singleton; Andrea I Luppi; Robin L Carhart-Harris; Josephine Cruzat; Leor Roseman; David J Nutt; Gustavo Deco; Morten L Kringelbach; Emmanuel A Stamatakis; Amy Kuceyeski Journal: Nat Commun Date: 2022-10-03 Impact factor: 17.694