Cees Valkenburg1, Dagmar E Slot2, Eric W P Bakker3, Fridus A Van der Weijden2. 1. Independent Dentist, Hoevelaken, The Netherlands. 2. Department of Periodontology Academic Centre for Dentistry, Amsterdam (ACTA), University of Amsterdam and Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands. 3. Division of Clinical Methods and Public Health, Academic Medical Centre (AMC), University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Abstract
AIMS: The aim of this systematic review was to establish the efficacy of brushing with and without a dentifrice for dental plaque removal. MATERIALS AND METHODS: MEDLINE-PubMed, Cochrane-CENTRAL, EMBASE and other electronic databases were searched. The inclusion criteria were randomized controlled trials and controlled clinical trials and subjects ≥18 years of age with good general health. Studies that evaluated the effect of toothbrushing with a dentifrice compared to brushing without a dentifrice were included. Data were extracted from the eligible studies, and a meta-analysis was performed where feasible. RESULT: The search was conducted until June 2016 and retrieved 10 eligible publications that included 20 comparisons. On average, 49.2% of plaque was removed when brushing was performed with a dentifrice, and 50.3% of plaque was removed when toothbrushing was performed without a dentifrice. The descriptive analysis indicated that the majority of the comparisons did not show an additional effect of dentifrice use. Regarding the meta-analysis of post-brushing scores, no significant difference was observed between toothbrushing with and without a dentifrice (DiffM 0.00, 95%CI [-0.05: 0.05], p = 0.91). The meta-analysis of incremental data (as means or percentages) supported and strengthened these findings. CONCLUSION: The cumulative evidence for this systematic review demonstrates that there is moderate certainty that toothbrushing with a dentifrice does not provide an added effect for the mechanical removal of dental plaque.
AIMS: The aim of this systematic review was to establish the efficacy of brushing with and without a dentifrice for dental plaque removal. MATERIALS AND METHODS: MEDLINE-PubMed, Cochrane-CENTRAL, EMBASE and other electronic databases were searched. The inclusion criteria were randomized controlled trials and controlled clinical trials and subjects ≥18 years of age with good general health. Studies that evaluated the effect of toothbrushing with a dentifrice compared to brushing without a dentifrice were included. Data were extracted from the eligible studies, and a meta-analysis was performed where feasible. RESULT: The search was conducted until June 2016 and retrieved 10 eligible publications that included 20 comparisons. On average, 49.2% of plaque was removed when brushing was performed with a dentifrice, and 50.3% of plaque was removed when toothbrushing was performed without a dentifrice. The descriptive analysis indicated that the majority of the comparisons did not show an additional effect of dentifrice use. Regarding the meta-analysis of post-brushing scores, no significant difference was observed between toothbrushing with and without a dentifrice (DiffM 0.00, 95%CI [-0.05: 0.05], p = 0.91). The meta-analysis of incremental data (as means or percentages) supported and strengthened these findings. CONCLUSION: The cumulative evidence for this systematic review demonstrates that there is moderate certainty that toothbrushing with a dentifrice does not provide an added effect for the mechanical removal of dental plaque.
Authors: Riccardo Monterubbianesi; Scilla Sparabombe; Vincenzo Tosco; Fabia Profili; Marco Mascitti; Andrell Hosein; Angelo Putignano; Giovanna Orsini Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health Date: 2020-12-01 Impact factor: 3.390
Authors: Abanoub Riad; Ave Põld; Jana Olak; Hans-Peter Howaldt; Miloslav Klugar; Martin Krsek; Sameh Attia Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health Date: 2022-02-08 Impact factor: 4.614
Authors: Abanoub Riad; Veronika Chuchmová; Ján Staněk; Barbora Hocková; Sameh Attia; Martin Krsek; Miloslav Klugar Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health Date: 2022-02-25 Impact factor: 4.614