Literature DB >> 27512020

The destination defines the journey: an examination of the kinematics of hand-to-mouth movements.

Jason W Flindall1, Claudia L R Gonzalez2.   

Abstract

Long-train electrical stimulation of the motor and premotor cortices of nonhuman primates can produce either hand-to-mouth or grasp-to-inspect movements, depending on the precise location of stimulation. Furthermore, single-neuron recording studies identify discrete neuronal populations in the inferior parietal and ventral premotor cortices that respond uniquely to either grasp-to-eat or grasp-to-place movements, despite their identical mechanistic requirements. These studies demonstrate that the macaque motor cortex is organized around producing functional, goal-oriented movements, rather than simply fulfilling muscular prerequisites of action. In humans, right-handed hand-to-mouth movements have a unique kinematic signature; smaller maximum grip apertures are produced when grasping to eat than when grasping to place identical targets. This is evidence that the motor cortex in humans is also organized around producing functional movements. However, in both macaques and humans, grasp-to-eat/hand-to-mouth movements have always been elicited using edible targets and have (necessarily) been paired with mouth movement. It is therefore unknown whether the kinematic distinction is a natural result of grasping food and/or is simply attributable to concurrent opening of the mouth while grasping. In experiment 1, we used goal-differentiated grasping tasks, directed toward edible and inedible targets, to show that the unique kinematic signature is present even with inedible targets. In experiment 2, we used the same goal-differentiated grasping tasks, either coupled with or divorced from an open-mouth movement, to show that the signature is not attributable merely to a planned opening of the mouth during the grasp. These results are discussed in relation to the role of hand-to-mouth movements in human development, independently of grasp-to-eat behavior.
Copyright © 2016 the American Physiological Society.

Entities:  

Keywords:  edible; grasp; grip aperture; hand; mouth

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27512020      PMCID: PMC5102312          DOI: 10.1152/jn.00222.2016

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Neurophysiol        ISSN: 0022-3077            Impact factor:   2.714


  39 in total

Review 1.  On the origin of skilled forelimb movements.

Authors:  A N Iwaniuk; I Q Whishaw
Journal:  Trends Neurosci       Date:  2000-08       Impact factor: 13.837

Review 2.  Did a change in sensory control of skilled movements stimulate the evolution of the primate frontal cortex?

Authors:  Ian Q Whishaw
Journal:  Behav Brain Res       Date:  2003-11-30       Impact factor: 3.332

3.  Complex movements evoked by microstimulation of precentral cortex.

Authors:  Michael S A Graziano; Charlotte S R Taylor; Tirin Moore
Journal:  Neuron       Date:  2002-05-30       Impact factor: 17.173

4.  Multimodal Encoding of Goal-Directed Actions in Monkey Ventral Premotor Grasping Neurons.

Authors:  Stefania Bruni; Valentina Giorgetti; Leonardo Fogassi; Luca Bonini
Journal:  Cereb Cortex       Date:  2017-01-01       Impact factor: 5.357

5.  The role of posterior parietal cortex in visually guided reaching movements in humans.

Authors:  C Kertzman; U Schwarz; T A Zeffiro; M Hallett
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  1997-03       Impact factor: 1.972

6.  Precocious hand use preference in reach-to-eat behavior versus manual construction in 1- to 5-year-old children.

Authors:  Lori-Ann R Sacrey; Benjamin Arnold; Ian Q Whishaw; Claudia L R Gonzalez
Journal:  Dev Psychobiol       Date:  2012-11-05       Impact factor: 3.038

7.  Hand use for grasping in a bimanual task: evidence for different roles?

Authors:  Kayla D Stone; Devon C Bryant; Claudia L R Gonzalez
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2012-11-18       Impact factor: 1.972

8.  Impairment of pronation, supination, and body co-ordination in reach-to-grasp tasks in human Parkinson's disease (PD) reveals homology to deficits in animal models.

Authors:  Ian Q Whishaw; Oksana Suchowersky; Leigh Davis; Justyna Sarna; Gerlinde A Metz; Sergio M Pellis
Journal:  Behav Brain Res       Date:  2002-07-18       Impact factor: 3.332

9.  Hand preference status and reach kinematics in infants.

Authors:  Eliza L Nelson; George D Konidaris; Neil E Berthier
Journal:  Infant Behav Dev       Date:  2014-09-16

10.  Social requests and social affordances: how they affect the kinematics of motor sequences during interactions between conspecifics.

Authors:  Francesca Ferri; Giovanna Cristina Campione; Riccardo Dalla Volta; Claudia Gianelli; Maurizio Gentilucci
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2011-01-24       Impact factor: 3.240

View more
  4 in total

1.  The inimitable mouth: task-dependent kinematic differences are independent of terminal precision.

Authors:  Jason W Flindall; Claudia L R Gonzalez
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2017-03-21       Impact factor: 1.972

2.  Kinematics of ventrally mediated grasp-to-eat actions: right-hand advantage is dependent on dorsal stream input.

Authors:  Clarissa Beke; Jason W Flindall; Claudia L R Gonzalez
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2018-03-27       Impact factor: 1.972

3.  The left cerebral hemisphere may be dominant for the control of bimanual symmetric reach-to-grasp movements.

Authors:  Jarrod Blinch; Jason W Flindall; Łukasz Smaga; Kwanghee Jung; Claudia Lr Gonzalez
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2019-10-29       Impact factor: 1.972

4.  Hear speech, change your reach: changes in the left-hand grasp-to-eat action during speech processing.

Authors:  Nicole A van Rootselaar; Jason W Flindall; Claudia L R Gonzalez
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2018-09-18       Impact factor: 1.972

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.