Literature DB >> 27511725

Gene set analysis for interpreting genetic studies.

Tune H Pers1.   

Abstract

Interpretation of genome-wide association study (GWAS) results is lacking behind the discovery of new genetic associations. Consequently, there is an urgent need for data-driven methods for interpreting genetic association studies. Gene set analysis (GSA) can identify aetiologic pathways and functional annotations and may hence point towards novel biological insights. However, despite the growing availability of GSA tools, the sizeable amount of variants identified for a vast number of complex traits, and many irrefutably trait-associated gene sets, the gap between discovery and interpretation remains. More efficient interpretation requires more complete and consistent gene set representations of biological pathways, phenotypes and functional annotations. In this review, I examine different types of gene sets, discuss how inconsistencies in gene set definitions impact GSA, describe how GSA has helped to elucidate biology and outline potential future directions.
© The Author 2016. Published by Oxford University Press. All rights reserved. For Permissions, please email: journals.permissions@oup.com.

Entities:  

Year:  2016        PMID: 27511725     DOI: 10.1093/hmg/ddw249

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Hum Mol Genet        ISSN: 0964-6906            Impact factor:   6.150


  8 in total

1.  A powerful subset-based method identifies gene set associations and improves interpretation in UK Biobank.

Authors:  Diptavo Dutta; Peter VandeHaar; Lars G Fritsche; Sebastian Zöllner; Michael Boehnke; Laura J Scott; Seunggeun Lee
Journal:  Am J Hum Genet       Date:  2021-03-16       Impact factor: 11.025

2.  Powerful gene set analysis in GWAS with the Generalized Berk-Jones statistic.

Authors:  Ryan Sun; Shirley Hui; Gary D Bader; Xihong Lin; Peter Kraft
Journal:  PLoS Genet       Date:  2019-03-15       Impact factor: 5.917

3.  Machine learning approach yields epigenetic biomarkers of food allergy: A novel 13-gene signature to diagnose clinical reactivity.

Authors:  Ayush Alag
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2019-06-19       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 4.  Fifteen Years of Gene Set Analysis for High-Throughput Genomic Data: A Review of Statistical Approaches and Future Challenges.

Authors:  Samarendra Das; Craig J McClain; Shesh N Rai
Journal:  Entropy (Basel)       Date:  2020-04-10       Impact factor: 2.524

5.  A comprehensive comparison of multilocus association methods with summary statistics in genome-wide association studies.

Authors:  Zhonghe Shao; Ting Wang; Jiahao Qiao; Yuchen Zhang; Shuiping Huang; Ping Zeng
Journal:  BMC Bioinformatics       Date:  2022-08-30       Impact factor: 3.307

6.  Variation in a range of mTOR-related genes associates with intracranial volume and intellectual disability.

Authors:  M R F Reijnders; M Kousi; G M van Woerden; M Klein; J Bralten; G M S Mancini; T van Essen; M Proietti-Onori; E E J Smeets; M van Gastel; A P A Stegmann; S J C Stevens; S H Lelieveld; C Gilissen; R Pfundt; P L Tan; T Kleefstra; B Franke; Y Elgersma; N Katsanis; H G Brunner
Journal:  Nat Commun       Date:  2017-10-20       Impact factor: 14.919

7.  Gene-set association and epistatic analyses reveal complex gene interaction networks affecting flowering time in a worldwide barley collection.

Authors:  Tianhua He; Camilla Beate Hill; Tefera Tolera Angessa; Xiao-Qi Zhang; Kefei Chen; David Moody; Paul Telfer; Sharon Westcott; Chengdao Li
Journal:  J Exp Bot       Date:  2019-10-24       Impact factor: 6.992

8.  De novo variants in exomes of congenital heart disease patients identify risk genes and pathways.

Authors:  Cigdem Sevim Bayrak; Peng Zhang; Martin Tristani-Firouzi; Bruce D Gelb; Yuval Itan
Journal:  Genome Med       Date:  2020-01-15       Impact factor: 11.117

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.