Literature DB >> 33730541

A powerful subset-based method identifies gene set associations and improves interpretation in UK Biobank.

Diptavo Dutta1, Peter VandeHaar2, Lars G Fritsche2, Sebastian Zöllner2, Michael Boehnke2, Laura J Scott2, Seunggeun Lee3.   

Abstract

Tests of association between a phenotype and a set of genes in a biological pathway can provide insights into the genetic architecture of complex phenotypes beyond those obtained from single-variant or single-gene association analysis. However, most existing gene set tests have limited power to detect gene set-phenotype association when a small fraction of the genes are associated with the phenotype and cannot identify the potentially "active" genes that might drive a gene set-based association. To address these issues, we have developed Gene set analysis Association Using Sparse Signals (GAUSS), a method for gene set association analysis that requires only GWAS summary statistics. For each significantly associated gene set, GAUSS identifies the subset of genes that have the maximal evidence of association and can best account for the gene set association. Using pre-computed correlation structure among test statistics from a reference panel, our p value calculation is substantially faster than other permutation- or simulation-based approaches. In simulations with varying proportions of causal genes, we find that GAUSS effectively controls type 1 error rate and has greater power than several existing methods, particularly when a small proportion of genes account for the gene set signal. Using GAUSS, we analyzed UK Biobank GWAS summary statistics for 10,679 gene sets and 1,403 binary phenotypes. We found that GAUSS is scalable and identified 13,466 phenotype and gene set association pairs. Within these gene sets, we identify an average of 17.2 (max = 405) genes that underlie these gene set associations.
Copyright © 2021 American Society of Human Genetics. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Keywords:  UK Biobank; core subset; pathway association; phenome-wide associations; summary statistics

Year:  2021        PMID: 33730541      PMCID: PMC8059336          DOI: 10.1016/j.ajhg.2021.02.016

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Hum Genet        ISSN: 0002-9297            Impact factor:   11.025


  53 in total

1.  A versatile gene-based test for genome-wide association studies.

Authors:  Jimmy Z Liu; Allan F McRae; Dale R Nyholt; Sarah E Medland; Naomi R Wray; Kevin M Brown; Nicholas K Hayward; Grant W Montgomery; Peter M Visscher; Nicholas G Martin; Stuart Macgregor
Journal:  Am J Hum Genet       Date:  2010-07-09       Impact factor: 11.025

2.  General framework for meta-analysis of rare variants in sequencing association studies.

Authors:  Seunggeun Lee; Tanya M Teslovich; Michael Boehnke; Xihong Lin
Journal:  Am J Hum Genet       Date:  2013-06-13       Impact factor: 11.025

3.  LD Score regression distinguishes confounding from polygenicity in genome-wide association studies.

Authors:  Brendan K Bulik-Sullivan; Po-Ru Loh; Hilary K Finucane; Stephan Ripke; Jian Yang; Nick Patterson; Mark J Daly; Alkes L Price; Benjamin M Neale
Journal:  Nat Genet       Date:  2015-02-02       Impact factor: 38.330

4.  emeraLD: rapid linkage disequilibrium estimation with massive datasets.

Authors:  Corbin Quick; Christian Fuchsberger; Daniel Taliun; Gonçalo Abecasis; Michael Boehnke; Hyun Min Kang
Journal:  Bioinformatics       Date:  2019-01-01       Impact factor: 6.937

Review 5.  Exogenous fatty acid metabolism in bacteria.

Authors:  Jiangwei Yao; Charles O Rock
Journal:  Biochimie       Date:  2017-06-28       Impact factor: 4.079

6.  Meta-MultiSKAT: Multiple phenotype meta-analysis for region-based association test.

Authors:  Diptavo Dutta; Sarah A Gagliano Taliun; Joshua S Weinstock; Matthew Zawistowski; Carlo Sidore; Lars G Fritsche; Francesco Cucca; David Schlessinger; Gonçalo R Abecasis; Chad M Brummett; Seunggeun Lee
Journal:  Genet Epidemiol       Date:  2019-08-21       Impact factor: 2.135

7.  Fast and accurate imputation of summary statistics enhances evidence of functional enrichment.

Authors:  Bogdan Pasaniuc; Noah Zaitlen; Huwenbo Shi; Gaurav Bhatia; Alexander Gusev; Joseph Pickrell; Joel Hirschhorn; David P Strachan; Nick Patterson; Alkes L Price
Journal:  Bioinformatics       Date:  2014-07-01       Impact factor: 6.937

8.  DIST: direct imputation of summary statistics for unmeasured SNPs.

Authors:  Donghyung Lee; T Bernard Bigdeli; Brien P Riley; Ayman H Fanous; Silviu-Alin Bacanu
Journal:  Bioinformatics       Date:  2013-08-28       Impact factor: 6.937

9.  Multi-trait analysis of genome-wide association summary statistics using MTAG.

Authors:  Patrick Turley; Raymond K Walters; Omeed Maghzian; Aysu Okbay; James J Lee; Mark Alan Fontana; Tuan Anh Nguyen-Viet; Robbee Wedow; Meghan Zacher; Nicholas A Furlotte; Patrik Magnusson; Sven Oskarsson; Magnus Johannesson; Peter M Visscher; David Laibson; David Cesarini; Benjamin M Neale; Daniel J Benjamin
Journal:  Nat Genet       Date:  2018-01-01       Impact factor: 38.330

10.  Improved polygenic prediction by Bayesian multiple regression on summary statistics.

Authors:  Luke R Lloyd-Jones; Jian Zeng; Julia Sidorenko; Loïc Yengo; Gerhard Moser; Kathryn E Kemper; Huanwei Wang; Zhili Zheng; Reedik Magi; Tõnu Esko; Andres Metspalu; Naomi R Wray; Michael E Goddard; Jian Yang; Peter M Visscher
Journal:  Nat Commun       Date:  2019-11-08       Impact factor: 14.919

View more
  3 in total

1.  Design and application of a knowledge network for automatic prioritization of drug mechanisms.

Authors:  Michael Mayers; Roger Tu; Dylan Steinecke; Tong Shu Li; Núria Queralt-Rosinach; Andrew I Su
Journal:  Bioinformatics       Date:  2022-05-13       Impact factor: 6.931

2.  Genome-Wide Association Study of Pelvic Organ Prolapse Using the Michigan Genomics Initiative.

Authors:  Caroline K Cox; Anita Pandit; Matthew Zawistowski; Diptavo Dutta; Goutham Narla; Carolyn W Swenson
Journal:  Female Pelvic Med Reconstr Surg       Date:  2021-08-01       Impact factor: 1.913

3.  Gene-based association tests using GWAS summary statistics and incorporating eQTL.

Authors:  Xuewei Cao; Xuexia Wang; Shuanglin Zhang; Qiuying Sha
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2022-03-03       Impact factor: 4.379

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.