Literature DB >> 27510884

In vitro comparison of intracranial stent visibility using various concentrations of gadolinium contrast agent under 1.5 T and 3 T MR angiography.

Chen-Hua Chiang1,2, Ying-Chi Tseng1,2, Ai-Chi Chen1, Yen-Lin Huang1,2, David Yen-Ting Chen1,2, Chi-Jen Chen2,3, Yen-Kuang Lin4, Hui-Ling Hsu1,2.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND
PURPOSE: MR angiography (MRA) is an increasingly used evaluation method following intracranial stenting. However, the various artifacts created by the stent limit this technique. The purpose of this study was to investigate the effects of various concentrations of gadolinium contrast agent on the visibility and signal characteristics of two stents using the a contrast enhanced MRA technique. MATERIAL AND
METHOD: Two intracranial stents (Enterprise and Helistent) were placed in polyvinyl chloride tubes as vascular phantoms. They were filled with six different doses of gadolinium contrast agent (1.0, 2.0, 4.0, 6.0, 8.0, and 10.0 mmol/L dimeglumine gadopentetate, respectively) and imaged using 3 T and 1.5 T MR systems. Relative in-stent signal (RIS) was calculated and artificial luminal narrowing (ALN) was obtained using pixel by pixel analysis. RESULT: The Enterprise stent, performed in both 1.5 T and 3 T MR systems, showed mean RIS values much less than those for the Helistent for all different doses of gadolinium solution. Increased gadolinium concentration resulted in a gradual reduction in RIS values in the Enterprise group. Also, ALN in the Enterprise group showed no or little change with various gadolinium doses.
CONCLUSIONS: The Enterprise stent demonstrated good luminal visibility regardless of gadolinium concentration. The relative in-stent signals were more predictable in the Enterprise stent with various doses of gadolinium. Therefore, the Enterprise stent has been shown to provide better in-stent visibility compared with the Helistent using various gadolinium doses. Published by the BMJ Publishing Group Limited. For permission to use (where not already granted under a licence) please go to http://www.bmj.com/company/products-services/rights-and-licensing/.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Magnetic Resonance Angiography; Stent

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27510884     DOI: 10.1136/neurintsurg-2016-012490

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Neurointerv Surg        ISSN: 1759-8478            Impact factor:   5.836


  2 in total

1.  Positive visualization of MR-compatible nitinol stent using a susceptibility-based imaging technique.

Authors:  Caiyun Shi; Guoxi Xie; Dong Liang; Haifeng Wang; Yi Huang; Yanan Ren; Yong Xue; Hanwei Chen; Shi Su; Xin Liu
Journal:  Quant Imaging Med Surg       Date:  2019-03

2.  Visualization of stent apposition after stent-assisted coiling of intracranial aneurysms using high resolution 3D fusion images acquired by C-arm CT.

Authors:  Naoki Kato; Ichiro Yuki; Toshihiro Ishibashi; Ayako Ikemura; Issei Kan; Kengo Nishimura; Tomonobu Kodama; Syougo Kaku; Yukiko Abe; Katharina Otani; Yuichi Murayama
Journal:  J Neurointerv Surg       Date:  2019-08-12       Impact factor: 5.836

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.