| Literature DB >> 27509369 |
Pei Liu1, Xiao-Hong Su1, Geng-Yan Xiong1, Xue-Song Li1, Li-Qun Zhou1.
Abstract
PURPOSE: To determine the effect of diagnostic ureteroscopy on intravesical recurrence in patients with upper tract urothelial carcinoma (UTUC) after radical nephroureterec¬tomy (RNU).Entities:
Keywords: Bladder; Oncology; Ureteroscopy
Mesh:
Year: 2016 PMID: 27509369 PMCID: PMC5117968 DOI: 10.1590/S1677-5538.IBJU.2015.0366
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Int Braz J Urol ISSN: 1677-5538 Impact factor: 1.541
Clinicopathological characteristics of 664 patients with RNU for UTUC.
| URS(+) n=81 | URS(-) n=583 | p values | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
| ||||
| Male | 31(38.3%) | 264(45.3%) | 0.234 | |
| Female | 50(61.7%) | 319(54.7%) | ||
|
| 65.9±11.3 | 66.6±10.7 | 0.617 | |
|
| ||||
| yes | 10(12.3%) | 111(19.0%) | 0.144 | |
| no | 71(87.7%) | 472(81.0%) | ||
|
| ||||
| Laparoscopic | 23(28.4%) | 196(33.6%) | 0.349 | |
| Open | 58(71.6%) | 387(66.4%) | ||
|
| ||||
| Pelvis | 26(32.1%) | 342(58.7%) | P<0.001 | |
| Ureter | 55(67.9%) | 241(41.3%) | ||
|
| ||||
| Multiple | 27(33.3%) | 132(22.6%) | 0.035 | |
| Solitary | 54(66.7%) | 451(77.4%) | ||
|
| ||||
| present | 45(55.6%) | 329(56.4%) | 0.882 | |
| absent | 36(44.4%) | 254(43.6%) | ||
|
| ||||
| ≥3 cm | 28(34.6%) | 335(57.5%) | P<0.001 | |
| <3 cm | 53(65.4%) | 248(42.5%) | ||
|
| ||||
| present | 4(4.9%) | 15(2.6%) | 0.400 | |
| absent | 77(95.1%) | 568(97.4%) | ||
|
| ||||
| <T2 | 65(80.2%) | 393(67.4%) | 0.019 | |
| >T2 | 16(19.8%) | 190(32.6%) | ||
|
| ||||
| N+ | 3(3.7%) | 44(7.5%) | 0.206 | |
| N0 | 78(96.3%) | 539(92.5%) | ||
|
| ||||
| Low | 51(63.0%) | 330(56.6%) | 0.278 | |
| High | 30(37.0%) | 253(43.4%) | ||
p<0.05, significant difference was reached
Figure 1Kaplan-Meier survival curves for intravesical recurrence-free survival stratified by preoperative diagnostic ureteroscopy.
Univariable and multivariate Cox regression analyses predicting intravesical recurrence in 664 patients after nephroureterectomy for UTUC.
| Univariate analysis (P value) | Multivariate Cox Regression analysis | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| HR | 95% CI | P | ||
|
| <0.001 | 1.592 | 1.143-2.218 | 0.006 |
|
| <0.001 | 1.596 | 1.206-2.111 | 0.001 |
|
| <0.001 | 1.459 | 1.104-1.929 | 0.008 |
|
| 0.001 | 1.438 | 1.053-1.964 | 0.022 |
|
| 0.004 | 2.512 | 1.019-6.195 | 0.045 |
|
| 0.01 | 1.295 | 0.984-1.705 | 0.065 |
|
| 0.023 | 0.907 | 0.639-1.287 | 0.982 |
|
| 0.737 | |||
|
| 0.065 | |||
|
| 0.934 | |||
|
| 0.871 | |||
|
| 0.293 | |||
|
| 0.606 | |||
p<0.05, significant difference was reached