| Literature DB >> 27508225 |
Larissa Balabanova1, Olga Nedashkovskaya2, Anna Podvolotskaya3, Lubov Slepchenko1, Vasily Golotin1, Alexey Belik2, Ludmila Shevchenko2, Oksana Son3, Valery Rasskazov2.
Abstract
Data is presented in support of functionality of hyper-diverse protein families encoded by the Cobetia amphilecti KMM 296 (formerly Cobetia marina KMM 296) genome ("The genome of the marine bacterium Cobetia marina KMM 296 isolated from the mussel Crenomytilus grayanus (Dunker, 1853)" [1]) providing its nutritional versatility, adaptability and biocontrol that could be the basis of the marine bacterium evolutionary and application potential. Presented data include the information of growth and biofilm-forming properties of the food-associated isolates of Pseudomonas, Bacillus, Listeria, Salmonella and Staphylococcus under the conditions of their co-culturing with C. amphilecti KMM 296 to confirm its high inter-species communication and anti-microbial activity. Also included are the experiments on the crude petroleum consumption by C. amphilecti KMM 296 as the sole source of carbon in the presence of sulfate or nitrate to ensure its bioremediation capacity. The multifunctional C. amphilecti KMM 296 genome is a promising source for the beneficial psychrophilic enzymes and essential secondary metabolites.Entities:
Year: 2016 PMID: 27508225 PMCID: PMC4949733 DOI: 10.1016/j.dib.2016.06.034
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Data Brief ISSN: 2352-3409
Fig. 1The neighbor-joining phylogenetic tree based on 16 S rRNA gene sequences of C. amphilecti KMM1561T (AB646236), C. litoralis KMM3880T (AB646234), C. marina DSM4741T (AJ306890), C. pacifica KMM3879T (AB646233), C. crustatorum (EU909460), showing a position of strain C. amphilecti KMM 296 (AY628693) within the genus Cobetia. Oceanospirillum multiglobiliferum IFO 13614T (AB006764) was used as outgroup. Bar 0.01 substitutions per nucleotide position.
Differential characteristics of strain KMM 296 and Cobetia amphilecti KMM 1561T.
| Source and site of isolation | Mollusc | Sponge |
| Oxidase | + | − |
| Salinity range (% NaCl) | 0.5-19 | 0-20 |
| Hydrolysis of DNA | − | + |
| Acid production from: | ||
| > | − | + |
| Assimilation of: | ||
| Maltose, | – | + |
| Capric acid, valeric acid | + | − |
| Enzyme activities: | ||
| Naphthol-AS-BI-phosphohydrolase, valine arylamidase, β-galactosidase | − | + |
| Trypsin | + | − |
| Susceptibility to: | ||
| Rifampicin, tetracycline and erythromycin | + | − |
| DNA G+C content (mol%) | 62.7 | 63.4 |
Footnote: Both strains were positive for the following tests: respiratory type of metabolism, motility; slightly yellowish colony color; growth at 4–42 °C; catalase, alkaline phosphatase, esterase (C4), esterase lipase (C8), leucine arylamidase, acid phosphatase and α-glucosidase activities, PNPG test; assimilation of sucrose, maltose, sodium malonate, glycogen, d-mannitol, d-glucose, 3-hydroxybutyric acid and l-proline, susceptibility to carbenicillin, cephalexin, cephazolin, chloramphenicol, gentamicin, kanamycin, nalidixic acid, neomycin, ofloxacin, polymyxin B, streptomycin and vancomycin; and resistance to ampicillin, benzylpenicillin, lincomycin, oleandomycin and oxacillin. Both strains were negative for the following tests: arginine dihydrolase, lipase (C14), cystine arylamidase, α-chymotrypsin, N-acetyl-β-glucosaminidase, β-glucosidase, α-galactosidase, β-glucuronidase, α-mannosidase and α-fucosidase activities, hydrolysis of agar, chitin, aesculin, gelatin, starch, urea and Tween 80; acid production from d-mannose, melibiose, raffinose, l-rhamnose, d-ribose, N-acetylglucosamine, inositol, d-sorbitol, glycerol and d-mannitol; nitrate reduction; production of H2S and indole; assimilation of l-arabinose, d-mannose, N-acetylglucosamine, adipate, phenylacetate, itaconic acid, sodium acetate, propionic acid, trisodium citrate and 4-hydroxybenzoic acid.
, Data from Romanenko et al. [2].
, Data from Ivanova et al. [3].
Fig. 2Microbial competition under co-culturing conditions of C. amphilecti KMM 296 together with the foodborne bacterial strains for 96 h in the liquid medium containing (g/L): bacto peptone – 2.0 g, casein hydrolyzate – 2.0 g, bacto yeast extract – 2.0 g, dextrin – 1.0 g, KH2PO4 – 0.02 g, MgSO4×7H2O – 0.005 g, natural sea water – 500 ml, distilled water – 500 ml, pH – 7.0. Bacterial isolate numbers are on the axis X. Cell number quantified in CFU mL−1 are on the axis Y. Row 1 – cell number of C. amphilecti KMM 296 from co-culturing mixes (n.15 – control sample of C. amphilecti KMM 296 culturing alone in the same conditions); Row 2 – cell number of the foodborne bacterial isolates from co-culturing mixes; Row 3 – cell number of the foodborne bacterial isolates culturing alone in the same conditions.
Fig. 3C. amphilecti KMM 296 cell density after co-culturing with the foodborne bacterial isolates (15 – control sample of C.amphilecti KMM 296 culturing alone in the same conditions). The foodborne bacterial isolate numbers are on the axis X. Cell number quantified in CFU mL−1 are on the axis Y.
Fig. 4Effect of C. amphilecti KMM 296 metabolites on the biofilm density of the food-associated bacterial isolates. Bacterial isolates numbers are on the axis X. Coefficient of biofilm density is on the axis Y. Row 1 – foodborne bacterial biofilms after the treatment by C. amphilecti KMM 296 filtrate from the co-culturing with the same species. Row 2 – control samples in the same conditions of incubation.
| Subject area | Biology, Chemistry |
| More specific subject area | Microbiology, Molecular Biology |
| Type of data | Table, text, figures |
| How data was acquired | Antimicrobial and hydrocarbon-degrading activities were determined using tests 3 M Petrifilm (USA), crystal violet, plate reader (BioRad), HPLC Shimadzu Prominence (Japan), C-18 column (Supelco). |
| Data format | Raw, analyzed |
| Experimental factors | Foodborne bacterial isolates were co-cultured with |
| Experimental features | Testing the biological activity of |
| Data source location | Collection of Marine Microorganisms (KMM) at the G.B. Elyakov Pacific Institute of Bioorganic Chemistry FEB RAS,Vladivostok, Russia |
| Data accessibility | Data is within this article |