BACKGROUND: With pre-operative prediction of liver volume becoming increasingly important to safely carry out complex hepatic resections, the aim of the present study was to validate the accuracy of a three-dimensional (3-D) liver surgery operative planning software in performing hepatic volumetry. METHODS: Between 1999 and 2007, we performed 29 live donor liver resections for transplantation. Eleven patients had pre-operative volumetry performed by radiologists from either computed tomography (CT) or magnetic resonance (MR) imaging with documentation of the corresponding specimen weight. Retrospectively, images were uploaded into Scout™ where 3-D models of each case were generated to perform volumetry. A correlational analysis was performed followed by an accuracy comparison. RESULTS: Estimations by both radiologists and Scout™ were significantly correlated with the specimen weights, P ≤ 0.0001. Compared with radiologists' volumetry, Scout™ significantly improved overall accuracy [per cent error (PE) 20.0% ± 5.3 vs. 32.9% ± 5.7, P=0.005], accuracy of CT-based estimations (PE 23.2% ± 6.7 vs. 37.2% ± 6.9, P=0.023) and accuracy of the left lateral section (PE 11.1% ± 3.9 vs. 26.6% ± 6.8, P=0.027). DISCUSSION: This 3-D planning software is a valid tool for use in volumetry. Significance is greatest for CT-based models of the left lateral section. This approach gives surgeons the ability to assess volumetrics and actively plan resections.
BACKGROUND: With pre-operative prediction of liver volume becoming increasingly important to safely carry out complex hepatic resections, the aim of the present study was to validate the accuracy of a three-dimensional (3-D) liver surgery operative planning software in performing hepatic volumetry. METHODS: Between 1999 and 2007, we performed 29 live donor liver resections for transplantation. Eleven patients had pre-operative volumetry performed by radiologists from either computed tomography (CT) or magnetic resonance (MR) imaging with documentation of the corresponding specimen weight. Retrospectively, images were uploaded into Scout™ where 3-D models of each case were generated to perform volumetry. A correlational analysis was performed followed by an accuracy comparison. RESULTS: Estimations by both radiologists and Scout™ were significantly correlated with the specimen weights, P ≤ 0.0001. Compared with radiologists' volumetry, Scout™ significantly improved overall accuracy [per cent error (PE) 20.0% ± 5.3 vs. 32.9% ± 5.7, P=0.005], accuracy of CT-based estimations (PE 23.2% ± 6.7 vs. 37.2% ± 6.9, P=0.023) and accuracy of the left lateral section (PE 11.1% ± 3.9 vs. 26.6% ± 6.8, P=0.027). DISCUSSION: This 3-D planning software is a valid tool for use in volumetry. Significance is greatest for CT-based models of the left lateral section. This approach gives surgeons the ability to assess volumetrics and actively plan resections.
Authors: H G Rau; R Schauer; T Helmberger; N Holzknecht; B von Rückmann; L Meyer; E Buttler; M Kessler; G Zahlmann; D Schuhmann; F W Schildberg Journal: Langenbecks Arch Surg Date: 2000-04 Impact factor: 3.445
Authors: T U Cohnert; H G Rau; E Buttler; T Hernandez-Richter; G Sauter; C Reuter; F W Schildberg Journal: World J Surg Date: 1997-05 Impact factor: 3.352
Authors: W Lamadé; G Glombitza; L Fischer; P Chiu; C E Cárdenas; M Thorn; H P Meinzer; L Grenacher; H Bauer; T Lehnert; C Herfarth Journal: Arch Surg Date: 2000-11
Authors: Michael J Goldstein; Ephrem Salame; Sandip Kapur; Milan Kinkhabwala; Diane LaPointe-Rudow; Patricia Harren N P; Steven J Lobritto; Mark Russo; Robert S Brown; Guellue Cataldegirmen; Alan Weinberg; John F Renz; Jean C Emond Journal: World J Surg Date: 2003-02-27 Impact factor: 3.352
Authors: Joost R van der Vorst; Ronald M van Dam; Rogier S A van Stiphout; Maartje A van den Broek; Ilona H Hollander; Alfons G H Kessels; Cornelis H C Dejong Journal: World J Surg Date: 2010-10 Impact factor: 3.352
Authors: William R Jarnagin; Mithat Gonen; Yuman Fong; Ronald P DeMatteo; Leah Ben-Porat; Sarah Little; Carlos Corvera; Sharon Weber; Leslie H Blumgart Journal: Ann Surg Date: 2002-10 Impact factor: 12.969
Authors: Simon A W G Dello; Jan H M B Stoot; Rogier S A van Stiphout; Johanne G Bloemen; Stephen J Wigmore; Cornelis H C Dejong; Ronald M van Dam Journal: World J Surg Date: 2011-02 Impact factor: 3.352
Authors: Logan W Clements; Jarrod A Collins; Jared A Weis; Amber L Simpson; T Peter Kingham; William R Jarnagin; Michael I Miga Journal: Surgery Date: 2017-07-10 Impact factor: 3.982
Authors: Xiangyang Ju; Helga Henseler; Matthew Jian-Qiao Peng; Balvinder S Khambay; Arup K Ray; Ashraf F Ayoub Journal: Med Biol Eng Comput Date: 2015-07-02 Impact factor: 2.602
Authors: T Peter Kingham; Michael A Scherer; Benjamin W Neese; Logan W Clements; James D Stefansic; William R Jarnagin Journal: HPB (Oxford) Date: 2012-05-21 Impact factor: 3.647
Authors: Kim M C van Mierlo; Toine M Lodewick; Dipok K Dhar; Victor van Woerden; Ralph Kurstjens; Frank G Schaap; Ronald M van Dam; Soumil Vyas; Massimo Malagó; Cornelis H C Dejong; Steven W M Olde Damink Journal: HPB (Oxford) Date: 2016-07-02 Impact factor: 3.647
Authors: Logan W Clements; Jarrod A Collins; Jared A Weis; Amber L Simpson; Lauryn B Adams; William R Jarnagin; Michael I Miga Journal: J Med Imaging (Bellingham) Date: 2016-03-23
Authors: Bruno Christ; Uta Dahmen; Karl-Heinz Herrmann; Matthias König; Jürgen R Reichenbach; Tim Ricken; Jana Schleicher; Lars Ole Schwen; Sebastian Vlaic; Navina Waschinsky Journal: Front Physiol Date: 2017-11-14 Impact factor: 4.566