Literature DB >> 27506820

Incidence, Treatment Intensity, and Incremental Annual Expenditures for Patients Experiencing a Cardiac Implantable Electronic Device Infection: Evidence From a Large US Payer Database 1-Year Post Implantation.

M Rizwan Sohail1, Elizabeth L Eby2, Michael P Ryan1, Candace Gunnarsson1, Laura A Wright1, Arnold J Greenspon1.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Because of the increasing use of cardiac implantable electronic devices (CIEDs), it is important to estimate the incidence and annual healthcare expenditures associated with CIED infections. METHODS AND
RESULTS: Patients with a record of an initial or replacement (full implant or generator only) CIED implant during the calendar years 2009 to 2012 in MarketScan Commercial Claims and Medicare Supplemental database were identified. CIED infections were classified into 4 categories: (1) infection not managed by inpatient admission nor implant removal, (2) infection managed by inpatient admission but no implant removal, (3) infection managed by an implant removal either in an inpatient or in an outpatient setting, and (4) infection with severe sepsis and managed in an inpatient setting with implant removal. Using separate models for initial and replacement cohorts, annualized incidence of infection and incremental annual expenditures by treatment intensity were estimated. Cumulative incidence of infection at 1 year post implant was 1.18% for initial CIED implants and 2.37% for replacement. Median time to infection was 35 days for initial and 23 days for replacement. Incremental healthcare expenditures by treatment intensity categories for initial implant patients at 1 year were $16 651, $104 077, $45 291, and $279 744. For replacement patients, incremental expenditures at 1 year by treatment intensity categories were $26 857, $43 541, $48 759, and $362 606.
CONCLUSIONS: The management of CIED infections results in a substantial healthcare burden with a significant increase in annual expenditures the year after implant when device infection occurs.
© 2016 American Heart Association, Inc.

Entities:  

Keywords:  device removal; healthcare costs; incidence; infection; outpatients

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27506820     DOI: 10.1161/CIRCEP.116.003929

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Circ Arrhythm Electrophysiol        ISSN: 1941-3084


  18 in total

Review 1.  Transvenous Lead Extractions: Current Approaches and Future Trends.

Authors:  Adryan A Perez; Frank W Woo; Darren C Tsang; Roger G Carrillo
Journal:  Arrhythm Electrophysiol Rev       Date:  2018-08

2.  Role of 18F-FDG PET/CT in the diagnosis of cardiovascular implantable electronic device infections: A meta-analysis.

Authors:  Maryam Mahmood; Ayse Tuba Kendi; Saira Farid; Saira Ajmal; Geoffrey B Johnson; Larry M Baddour; Panithaya Chareonthaitawee; Paul A Friedman; M Rizwan Sohail
Journal:  J Nucl Cardiol       Date:  2017-09-14       Impact factor: 5.952

3.  Evolution of Procedure Indication and Cardiovascular Risk in Transvenous Lead Extraction.

Authors:  Daniel Hofer; Michelle C Bebié; Noah Kuster; Jan Steffel; Alexander Breitenstein
Journal:  J Clin Med       Date:  2022-06-22       Impact factor: 4.964

4.  Epidemiology of cardiac implantable electronic device infections: incidence and risk factors.

Authors:  Hui-Chen Han; Nathaniel M Hawkins; Charles M Pearman; David H Birnie; Andrew D Krahn
Journal:  Europace       Date:  2021-06-23       Impact factor: 5.214

5.  The effect of stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) using flattening filter-free beams on cardiac implantable electronic devices (CIEDs) in clinical situations.

Authors:  Hossein Aslian; Tomas Kron; Troy Watts; Cagla Akalanli; Nicholas Hardcastle; Peta Lonski; Atousa Montaseri; Barry Hay; James Korte; Kemal Berk; Francesco Longo; Mara Severgnini
Journal:  J Appl Clin Med Phys       Date:  2020-04-11       Impact factor: 2.102

6.  European Heart Rhythm Association (EHRA) international consensus document on how to prevent, diagnose, and treat cardiac implantable electronic device infections-endorsed by the Heart Rhythm Society (HRS), the Asia Pacific Heart Rhythm Society (APHRS), the Latin American Heart Rhythm Society (LAHRS), International Society for Cardiovascular Infectious Diseases (ISCVID) and the European Society of Clinical Microbiology and Infectious Diseases (ESCMID) in collaboration with the European Association for Cardio-Thoracic Surgery (EACTS).

Authors:  Carina Blomström-Lundqvist; Vassil Traykov; Paola Anna Erba; Haran Burri; Jens Cosedis Nielsen; Maria Grazia Bongiorni; Jeanne Poole; Giuseppe Boriani; Roberto Costa; Jean-Claude Deharo; Laurence M Epstein; Laszlo Saghy; Ulrika Snygg-Martin; Christoph Starck; Carlo Tascini; Neil Strathmore
Journal:  Europace       Date:  2020-04-01       Impact factor: 5.214

7.  Spinal Cord Stimulation Infection Rate and Risk Factors: Results From a United States Payer Database.

Authors:  Steven M Falowski; David A Provenzano; Ying Xia; Alissa H Doth
Journal:  Neuromodulation       Date:  2018-08-17

8.  Anti-biofilm activity of antibiotic-loaded Hylomate®.

Authors:  Mariana Albano; Kerryl E Greenwood-Quaintance; Melissa J Karau; Jayawant N Mandrekar; Robin Patel
Journal:  Int J Cardiol Heart Vasc       Date:  2021-06-08

9.  Effect of battery longevity on costs and health outcomes associated with cardiac implantable electronic devices: a Markov model-based Monte Carlo simulation.

Authors:  Jordana K Schmier; Edmund C Lau; Jasmine D Patel; Juergen A Klenk; Arnold J Greenspon
Journal:  J Interv Card Electrophysiol       Date:  2017-11-06       Impact factor: 1.900

10.  Cardiac implantable electronic device (CIED) infections are expensive and associated with prolonged hospitalisation: UK Retrospective Observational Study.

Authors:  Fozia Zahir Ahmed; Catherine Fullwood; Mahvash Zaman; Ahmed Qamruddin; Colin Cunnington; Mamas A Mamas; Jonathan Sandoe; Manish Motwani; Amir Zaidi
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2019-01-02       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.