Literature DB >> 27506746

Validation of a metabolite panel for early diagnosis of type 2 diabetes.

Tonia C Carter1, Dietrich Rein2, Inken Padberg3, Erik Peter4, Ulrike Rennefahrt5, Donna E David6, Valerie McManus7, Elisha Stefanski8, Silke Martin9, Philipp Schatz10, Steven J Schrodi11.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Accurate, early diagnosis of type 2 diabetes (T2D) would enable more effective clinical management and a reduction in T2D complications. Therefore, we sought to identify plasma metabolite and protein biomarkers that, in combination with glucose, can better predict future T2D compared with glucose alone.
METHODS: In this case-control study, we used plasma samples from the Bavarian Red Cross Blood Transfusion Center study (61 T2D cases and 78 non-diabetic controls) for discovering T2D-associated metabolites, and plasma samples from the Personalized Medicine Research Project in Wisconsin (56 T2D cases and 445 non-diabetic controls) for validation. All samples were obtained before or at T2D diagnosis. We tested whether the T2D-associated metabolites could distinguish incident T2D cases from controls, as measured by the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC). Additionally, we tested six metabolic/pro-inflammatory proteins for their potential to augment the ability of the metabolites to distinguish cases from controls.
RESULTS: A panel of 10 metabolites discriminated better between T2D cases and controls than glucose alone (AUCs: 0.90 vs 0.87; p=2.08×10(-5)) in Bavarian samples, and associations between these metabolites and T2D were confirmed in Wisconsin samples. With use of either a Bayesian network classifier or ridge logistic regression, the metabolites, with or without the proteins, discriminated incident T2D cases from controls marginally better than glucose in the Wisconsin samples, although the difference in AUCs was not statistically significant. However, when the metabolites and proteins were added to two previously reported T2D prediction models, the AUCs were higher than those of each prediction model alone (AUCs: 0.92 vs 0.87; p=3.96×10(-2) and AUCs: 0.91 vs 0.71; p=1.03×10(-5), for each model, respectively).
CONCLUSIONS: Compared with glucose alone or with previously described T2D prediction models, a panel of plasma biomarkers showed promise for improved discrimination of incident T2D, but more investigation is needed to develop an early diagnostic marker.
Copyright © 2016 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Biomarker; Diabetes; Glucose; Metabolomics; Predictive modeling

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27506746      PMCID: PMC5518599          DOI: 10.1016/j.metabol.2016.06.007

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Metabolism        ISSN: 0026-0495            Impact factor:   8.694


  37 in total

1.  Weekly subcutaneous pegylated recombinant native human leptin (PEG-OB) administration in obese men.

Authors:  C J Hukshorn; W H Saris; M S Westerterp-Plantenga; A R Farid; F J Smith; L A Campfield
Journal:  J Clin Endocrinol Metab       Date:  2000-11       Impact factor: 5.958

Review 2.  The global burden of diabetes and its complications: an emerging pandemic.

Authors:  Susan van Dieren; Joline W J Beulens; Yvonne T van der Schouw; Diederick E Grobbee; Bruce Neal
Journal:  Eur J Cardiovasc Prev Rehabil       Date:  2010-05

3.  Associations of adiponectin with metabolic and vascular risk parameters in the British Regional Heart Study reveal stronger links to insulin resistance-related than to coronory heart disease risk-related parameters.

Authors:  S G Wannamethee; J Tchernova; P Whincup; G D Lowe; A Rumley; K Brown; L Cherry; N Sattar
Journal:  Int J Obes (Lond)       Date:  2007-02-13       Impact factor: 5.095

4.  Hypoadiponectinemia in obesity and type 2 diabetes: close association with insulin resistance and hyperinsulinemia.

Authors:  C Weyer; T Funahashi; S Tanaka; K Hotta; Y Matsuzawa; R E Pratley; P A Tataranni
Journal:  J Clin Endocrinol Metab       Date:  2001-05       Impact factor: 5.958

5.  The diabetes risk score: a practical tool to predict type 2 diabetes risk.

Authors:  Jaana Lindström; Jaakko Tuomilehto
Journal:  Diabetes Care       Date:  2003-03       Impact factor: 19.112

6.  Physiological changes in circulating mannose levels in normal, glucose-intolerant, and diabetic subjects.

Authors:  Hirohito Sone; Hitoshi Shimano; Hiroyuki Ebinuma; Akimitsu Takahashi; Yoshihiro Yano; Kaoruko Tada Iida; Hiroaki Suzuki; Hideo Toyoshima; Yasushi Kawakami; Yukichi Okuda; Yuichi Noguchi; Koji Ushizawa; Kazunori Saito; Nobuhiro Yamada
Journal:  Metabolism       Date:  2003-08       Impact factor: 8.694

7.  Adiponectin and protection against type 2 diabetes mellitus.

Authors:  Joachim Spranger; Anja Kroke; Matthias Möhlig; Manuela M Bergmann; Michael Ristow; Heiner Boeing; Andreas F H Pfeiffer
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2003-01-18       Impact factor: 79.321

8.  Prediction of incident diabetes mellitus in middle-aged adults: the Framingham Offspring Study.

Authors:  Peter W F Wilson; James B Meigs; Lisa Sullivan; Caroline S Fox; David M Nathan; Ralph B D'Agostino
Journal:  Arch Intern Med       Date:  2007-05-28

9.  Interleukin-6 (IL-6) induces insulin resistance in 3T3-L1 adipocytes and is, like IL-8 and tumor necrosis factor-alpha, overexpressed in human fat cells from insulin-resistant subjects.

Authors:  Victoria Rotter; Ivan Nagaev; Ulf Smith
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  2003-09-02       Impact factor: 5.157

Review 10.  1,5-anhydroglucitol (GlycoMark) as a marker of short-term glycemic control and glycemic excursions.

Authors:  Kathleen M Dungan
Journal:  Expert Rev Mol Diagn       Date:  2008-01       Impact factor: 5.225

View more
  12 in total

1.  A gene-based recessive diplotype exome scan discovers FGF6, a novel hepcidin-regulating iron-metabolism gene.

Authors:  Shicheng Guo; Shuai Jiang; Narendranath Epperla; Yanyun Ma; Mehdi Maadooliat; Zhan Ye; Brent Olson; Minghua Wang; Terrie Kitchner; Jeffrey Joyce; Peng An; Fudi Wang; Robert Strenn; Joseph J Mazza; Jennifer K Meece; Wenyu Wu; Li Jin; Judith A Smith; Jiucun Wang; Steven J Schrodi
Journal:  Blood       Date:  2019-02-27       Impact factor: 22.113

2.  Plasma metabolites predict both insulin resistance and incident type 2 diabetes: a metabolomics approach within the Prevención con Dieta Mediterránea (PREDIMED) study.

Authors:  Christopher Papandreou; Mònica Bulló; Miguel Ruiz-Canela; Courtney Dennis; Amy Deik; Daniel Wang; Marta Guasch-Ferré; Edward Yu; Cristina Razquin; Dolores Corella; Ramon Estruch; Emilio Ros; Montserrat Fitó; Miquel Fiol; Liming Liang; Pablo Hernández-Alonso; Clary B Clish; Miguel A Martínez-González; Frank B Hu; Jordi Salas-Salvadó
Journal:  Am J Clin Nutr       Date:  2019-03-01       Impact factor: 7.045

3.  The discovery of novel predictive biomarkers and early-stage pathophysiology for the transition from gestational diabetes to type 2 diabetes.

Authors:  Saifur R Khan; Haneesha Mohan; Ying Liu; Battsetseg Batchuluun; Himaben Gohil; Dana Al Rijjal; Yousef Manialawy; Brian J Cox; Erica P Gunderson; Michael B Wheeler
Journal:  Diabetologia       Date:  2019-01-15       Impact factor: 10.122

Review 4.  Review of methods for detecting glycemic disorders.

Authors:  Michael Bergman; Muhammad Abdul-Ghani; Ralph A DeFronzo; Melania Manco; Giorgio Sesti; Teresa Vanessa Fiorentino; Antonio Ceriello; Mary Rhee; Lawrence S Phillips; Stephanie Chung; Celeste Cravalho; Ram Jagannathan; Louis Monnier; Claude Colette; David Owens; Cristina Bianchi; Stefano Del Prato; Mariana P Monteiro; João Sérgio Neves; Jose Luiz Medina; Maria Paula Macedo; Rogério Tavares Ribeiro; João Filipe Raposo; Brenda Dorcely; Nouran Ibrahim; Martin Buysschaert
Journal:  Diabetes Res Clin Pract       Date:  2020-06-01       Impact factor: 5.602

5.  Mathematical models of amino acid panel for assisting diagnosis of children acute leukemia.

Authors:  Zhidai Liu; Tingting Zhou; Xing Han; Tingyuan Lang; Shan Liu; Penghui Zhang; Haiyan Liu; Kexing Wan; Jie Yu; Liang Zhang; Liyan Chen; Roger W Beuerman; Bin Peng; Lei Zhou; Lin Zou
Journal:  J Transl Med       Date:  2019-01-23       Impact factor: 5.531

6.  Amino acid and lipid metabolism in post-gestational diabetes and progression to type 2 diabetes: A metabolic profiling study.

Authors:  Mi Lai; Ying Liu; Gabriele V Ronnett; Anne Wu; Brian J Cox; Feihan F Dai; Hannes L Röst; Erica P Gunderson; Michael B Wheeler
Journal:  PLoS Med       Date:  2020-05-20       Impact factor: 11.069

7.  Triangulating evidence from longitudinal and Mendelian randomization studies of metabolomic biomarkers for type 2 diabetes.

Authors:  Eleonora Porcu; Federica Gilardi; Liza Darrous; Loic Yengo; Nasim Bararpour; Marie Gasser; Pedro Marques-Vidal; Philippe Froguel; Gerard Waeber; Aurelien Thomas; Zoltán Kutalik
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2021-03-18       Impact factor: 4.379

8.  Metabolomic biomarkers of pancreatic cancer: a meta-analysis study.

Authors:  Khyati Y Mehta; Hung-Jen Wu; Smrithi S Menon; Yassi Fallah; Xiaogang Zhong; Nasser Rizk; Keith Unger; Mark Mapstone; Massimo S Fiandaca; Howard J Federoff; Amrita K Cheema
Journal:  Oncotarget       Date:  2017-08-18

9.  Targeted Clinical Metabolite Profiling Platform for the Stratification of Diabetic Patients.

Authors:  Linda Ahonen; Sirkku Jäntti; Tommi Suvitaival; Simone Theilade; Claudia Risz; Risto Kostiainen; Peter Rossing; Matej Orešič; Tuulia Hyötyläinen
Journal:  Metabolites       Date:  2019-09-14

10.  Prediction of Type 1 Diabetes at Birth: Cord Blood Metabolites vs Genetic Risk Score in the Norwegian Mother, Father, and Child Cohort.

Authors:  German Tapia; Tommi Suvitaival; Linda Ahonen; Nicolai A Lund-Blix; Pål R Njølstad; Geir Joner; Torild Skrivarhaug; Cristina Legido-Quigley; Ketil Størdal; Lars C Stene
Journal:  J Clin Endocrinol Metab       Date:  2021-09-27       Impact factor: 5.958

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.