Saifur R Khan1,2, Haneesha Mohan1,2, Ying Liu1,2, Battsetseg Batchuluun1,2, Himaben Gohil1,2, Dana Al Rijjal1,2, Yousef Manialawy1,2, Brian J Cox3,4, Erica P Gunderson5, Michael B Wheeler6,7. 1. Endocrine and Diabetes Platform, Department of Physiology, University of Toronto, Medical Sciences Building, Room 3352, 1 King's College Circle, Toronto, ON, M5S 1A8, Canada. 2. Advanced Diagnostics, Metabolism, Toronto General Hospital Research Institute, Toronto, ON, Canada. 3. Reproduction and Development Platform, Department of Physiology, University of Toronto, Medical Sciences Building, Room 3360, 1 King's College Circle, Toronto, ON, M5S 1A8, Canada. b.cox@utoronto.ca. 4. Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada. b.cox@utoronto.ca. 5. Kaiser Permanente Northern California, Division of Research, 2000 Broadway, Oakland, CA, 94612, USA. erica.gunderson@kp.org. 6. Endocrine and Diabetes Platform, Department of Physiology, University of Toronto, Medical Sciences Building, Room 3352, 1 King's College Circle, Toronto, ON, M5S 1A8, Canada. michael.wheeler@utoronto.ca. 7. Advanced Diagnostics, Metabolism, Toronto General Hospital Research Institute, Toronto, ON, Canada. michael.wheeler@utoronto.ca.
Abstract
AIMS/HYPOTHESIS: Gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM) affects up to 20% of pregnancies, and almost half of the women affected progress to type 2 diabetes later in life, making GDM the most significant risk factor for the development of future type 2 diabetes. An accurate prediction of future type 2 diabetes risk in the early postpartum period after GDM would allow for timely interventions to prevent or delay type 2 diabetes. In addition, new targets for interventions may be revealed by understanding the underlying pathophysiology of the transition from GDM to type 2 diabetes. The aim of this study is to identify both a predictive signature and early-stage pathophysiology of the transition from GDM to type 2 diabetes. METHODS: We used a well-characterised prospective cohort of women with a history of GDM pregnancy, all of whom were enrolled at 6-9 weeks postpartum (baseline), were confirmed not to have diabetes via 2 h 75 g OGTT and tested anually for type 2 diabetes on an ongoing basis (2 years of follow-up). A large-scale targeted lipidomic study was implemented to analyse ~1100 lipid metabolites in baseline plasma samples using a nested pair-matched case-control design, with 55 incident cases matched to 85 non-case control participants. The relationships between the concentrations of baseline plasma lipids and respective follow-up status (either type 2 diabetes or no type 2 diabetes) were employed to discover both a predictive signature and the underlying pathophysiology of the transition from GDM to type 2 diabetes. In addition, the underlying pathophysiology was examined in vivo and in vitro. RESULTS: Machine learning optimisation in a decision tree format revealed a seven-lipid metabolite type 2 diabetes predictive signature with a discriminating power (AUC) of 0.92 (87% sensitivity, 93% specificity and 91% accuracy). The signature was highly robust as it includes 45-fold cross-validation under a high confidence threshold (1.0) and binary output, which together minimise the chance of data overfitting and bias selection. Concurrent analysis of differentially expressed lipid metabolite pathways uncovered the upregulation of α-linolenic/linoleic acid metabolism (false discovery rate [FDR] 0.002) and fatty acid biosynthesis (FDR 0.005) and the downregulation of sphingolipid metabolism (FDR 0.009) as being strongly associated with the risk of developing future type 2 diabetes. Focusing specifically on sphingolipids, the downregulation of sphingolipid metabolism using the pharmacological inhibitors fumonisin B1 (FB1) and myriocin in mouse islets and Min6 K8 cells (a pancreatic beta-cell like cell line) significantly impaired glucose-stimulated insulin secretion but had no significant impact on whole-body glucose homeostasis or insulin sensitivity. CONCLUSIONS/ INTERPRETATION: We reveal a novel predictive signature and associate reduced sphingolipids with the pathophysiology of transition from GDM to type 2 diabetes. Attenuating sphingolipid metabolism in islets impairs glucose-stimulated insulin secretion.
AIMS/HYPOTHESIS: Gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM) affects up to 20% of pregnancies, and almost half of the women affected progress to type 2 diabetes later in life, making GDM the most significant risk factor for the development of future type 2 diabetes. An accurate prediction of future type 2 diabetes risk in the early postpartum period after GDM would allow for timely interventions to prevent or delay type 2 diabetes. In addition, new targets for interventions may be revealed by understanding the underlying pathophysiology of the transition from GDM to type 2 diabetes. The aim of this study is to identify both a predictive signature and early-stage pathophysiology of the transition from GDM to type 2 diabetes. METHODS: We used a well-characterised prospective cohort of women with a history of GDM pregnancy, all of whom were enrolled at 6-9 weeks postpartum (baseline), were confirmed not to have diabetes via 2 h 75 g OGTT and tested anually for type 2 diabetes on an ongoing basis (2 years of follow-up). A large-scale targeted lipidomic study was implemented to analyse ~1100 lipid metabolites in baseline plasma samples using a nested pair-matched case-control design, with 55 incident cases matched to 85 non-case control participants. The relationships between the concentrations of baseline plasma lipids and respective follow-up status (either type 2 diabetes or no type 2 diabetes) were employed to discover both a predictive signature and the underlying pathophysiology of the transition from GDM to type 2 diabetes. In addition, the underlying pathophysiology was examined in vivo and in vitro. RESULTS: Machine learning optimisation in a decision tree format revealed a seven-lipid metabolite type 2 diabetes predictive signature with a discriminating power (AUC) of 0.92 (87% sensitivity, 93% specificity and 91% accuracy). The signature was highly robust as it includes 45-fold cross-validation under a high confidence threshold (1.0) and binary output, which together minimise the chance of data overfitting and bias selection. Concurrent analysis of differentially expressed lipid metabolite pathways uncovered the upregulation of α-linolenic/linoleic acid metabolism (false discovery rate [FDR] 0.002) and fatty acid biosynthesis (FDR 0.005) and the downregulation of sphingolipid metabolism (FDR 0.009) as being strongly associated with the risk of developing future type 2 diabetes. Focusing specifically on sphingolipids, the downregulation of sphingolipid metabolism using the pharmacological inhibitors fumonisin B1 (FB1) and myriocin in mouse islets and Min6 K8 cells (a pancreatic beta-cell like cell line) significantly impaired glucose-stimulated insulin secretion but had no significant impact on whole-body glucose homeostasis or insulin sensitivity. CONCLUSIONS/ INTERPRETATION: We reveal a novel predictive signature and associate reduced sphingolipids with the pathophysiology of transition from GDM to type 2 diabetes. Attenuating sphingolipid metabolism in islets impairs glucose-stimulated insulin secretion.
Authors: Martha Lappas; Piyushkumar A Mundra; Gerard Wong; Kevin Huynh; Debra Jinks; Harry M Georgiou; Michael Permezel; Peter J Meikle Journal: Diabetologia Date: 2015-04-17 Impact factor: 10.122
Authors: Thomas J Wang; Martin G Larson; Ramachandran S Vasan; Susan Cheng; Eugene P Rhee; Elizabeth McCabe; Gregory D Lewis; Caroline S Fox; Paul F Jacques; Céline Fernandez; Christopher J O'Donnell; Stephen A Carr; Vamsi K Mootha; Jose C Florez; Amanda Souza; Olle Melander; Clary B Clish; Robert E Gerszten Journal: Nat Med Date: 2011-03-20 Impact factor: 53.440
Authors: Ximena Lopez; Allison B Goldfine; William L Holland; Ruth Gordillo; Philipp E Scherer Journal: J Pediatr Endocrinol Metab Date: 2013 Impact factor: 1.634
Authors: Kirsten A Berk; Monique T Mulder; Adrie J M Verhoeven; Herman van Wietmarschen; Ruud Boessen; Linette P Pellis; Adriaan van T Spijker; Reinier Timman; Behiye Ozcan; Eric J G Sijbrands Journal: PLoS One Date: 2016-08-05 Impact factor: 3.240
Authors: Mugdha V Joglekar; Wilson K M Wong; Fahmida K Ema; Harry M Georgiou; Alexis Shub; Anandwardhan A Hardikar; Martha Lappas Journal: Diabetologia Date: 2021-03-23 Impact factor: 10.122
Authors: Mi Lai; Ying Liu; Gabriele V Ronnett; Anne Wu; Brian J Cox; Feihan F Dai; Hannes L Röst; Erica P Gunderson; Michael B Wheeler Journal: PLoS Med Date: 2020-05-20 Impact factor: 11.069
Authors: Mohammad L Rahman; Yen-Chen A Feng; Oliver Fiehn; Paul S Albert; Michael Y Tsai; Yeyi Zhu; Xiaobin Wang; Fasil Tekola-Ayele; Liming Liang; Cuilin Zhang Journal: BMJ Open Diabetes Res Care Date: 2021-03
Authors: Yu Liu; Alan Kuang; James R Bain; Michael J Muehlbauer; Olga R Ilkayeva; Lynn P Lowe; Boyd E Metzger; Christopher B Newgard; Denise M Scholtens; William L Lowe Journal: J Clin Endocrinol Metab Date: 2021-10-21 Impact factor: 6.134
Authors: Mi Lai; Dana Al Rijjal; Hannes L Röst; Feihan F Dai; Erica P Gunderson; Michael B Wheeler Journal: Elife Date: 2020-08-04 Impact factor: 8.140