Literature DB >> 27504382

Comparison of Albumin, Hydroxyethyl Starch and Ringer Lactate Solution as Priming Fluid for Cardiopulmonary Bypass in Paediatric Cardiac Surgery.

Jigar Patel1, Mrugesh Prajapati1, Atul Solanki2, Himani Pandya3.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: In paediatric cardiac surgery, there is still not any information with regard to the best choice of priming fluids for Cardiopulmonary Bypass (CPB). Albumin, Hydroxyethyl Starch (HES) & ringer lactate are equally used, but each has its advantages & disadvantages. Albumin & HES had better fluid balance which affect outcome in paediatric cardiac surgery significantly. AIM: To compare priming solution containing albumin, hydroxyethyl starch and ringer lactate during elective open-heart surgery in paediatrics aged up to 3 years.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: All patients were managed by standardized institution protocol and were randomly distributed into three groups based on the priming solution which is used in the CPB Circuit and having 35 patients in each group. Group A: Receive albumin 10 ml/kg in priming solution, Group B: Receive Hydroxyethyl starch (HES130/0.4) 6% 20ml/kg in priming solution, Group C: Receive ringer lactate priming solution. Primary outcome variable included perioperative haemoglobin, total protein, colloid osmotic pressure, platelets, fluid balance, urine output, post-operative blood loss, blood products usage, renal & liver function, extubation time, ICU stay & outcome.
RESULTS: Patients receiving albumin had higher perioperative platelet count, total protein level & colloid osmotic pressure, lesser post-operative blood loss & blood products requirement. Patients receiving HES had lower level of platelets postoperatively than ringer lactate group but not associated with increase blood loss. HES did not affect renal function & haemostasis in this dose. Patients receiving ringer lactate had positive fluid balance intraoperatively. All three groups have similar effect on renal & liver function, urine output, time to extubation, ICU stay & outcome.
CONCLUSION: We conclude that albumin is expensive but better prime as maintain haemostasis, colloid oncotic pressure & reduced blood product requirement. HES will not hamper haemostasis & renal function in lower dose & better than crystalloid as maintain negative fluid balance. Patient outcome & ICU stay was similarly affected by priming solutions.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Colloid; Crystalloid; Haemostasis; Renal function

Year:  2016        PMID: 27504382      PMCID: PMC4963742          DOI: 10.7860/JCDR/2016/18465.7918

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Clin Diagn Res        ISSN: 0973-709X


  10 in total

1.  Colloids versus crystalloids as priming solutions for cardiopulmonary bypass: a meta-analysis of prospective, randomised clinical trials.

Authors:  D Himpe
Journal:  Acta Anaesthesiol Belg       Date:  2003

2.  A prospective randomized study of hydroxyethyl starch, albumin, and lactated Ringer's solution as priming fluid for cardiopulmonary bypass.

Authors:  R M Sade; M R Stroud; F A Crawford; J M Kratz; J P Dearing; D M Bartles
Journal:  J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg       Date:  1985-05       Impact factor: 5.209

3.  "Inflammatory response to colloids compared to crystalloid priming in cardiac surgery patients with cardiopulmonary bypass".

Authors:  Huey-Ling Liou; Chun-Che Shih; Yann-Fen C Chao; Nien-Tsung Lin; Shau-Ting Lai; Shu-Hua Wang; Hsing I Chen
Journal:  Chin J Physiol       Date:  2012-06-30       Impact factor: 1.764

4.  Comparing the effects of 5% albumin and 6% hydroxyethyl starch 130/0.4 on coagulation and inflammatory response when used as priming solutions for cardiopulmonary bypass.

Authors:  Y S Choi; J K Shim; S W Hong; J C Kim; Y L Kwak
Journal:  Minerva Anestesiol       Date:  2010-05-27       Impact factor: 3.051

5.  The effect of HES (130/0.4) usage as the priming solution on renal function in children undergoing cardiac surgery.

Authors:  Fulya G Akkucuk; Meral Kanbak; Banu Ayhan; Bilge Celebioglu; Ulku Aypar
Journal:  Ren Fail       Date:  2012-12-11       Impact factor: 2.606

6.  Hydroxyethyl starch as a priming solution for cardiopulmonary bypass impairs hemostasis after cardiac surgery.

Authors:  Anne H Kuitunen; Markku J Hynynen; Elina Vahtera; Markku T Salmenperä
Journal:  Anesth Analg       Date:  2004-02       Impact factor: 5.108

7.  Albumin versus crystalloid for pump priming in cardiac surgery: meta-analysis of controlled trials.

Authors:  James A Russell; Roberta J Navickis; Mahlon M Wilkes
Journal:  J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth       Date:  2004-08       Impact factor: 2.628

8.  The importance of colloid osmotic pressure during open heart surgery in infants.

Authors:  K Haneda; S Sato; E Ishizawa; T Horiuchi
Journal:  Tohoku J Exp Med       Date:  1985-09       Impact factor: 1.848

9.  Hydroxyethyl starch 6%, 130/0.4 vs. a balanced crystalloid solution in cardiopulmonary bypass priming: a randomized, prospective study.

Authors:  Hasan Alper Gurbuz; Ahmet Baris Durukan; Nevriye Salman; Murat Tavlasoglu; Elif Durukan; Halil İbrahim Ucar; Cem Yorgancioglu
Journal:  J Cardiothorac Surg       Date:  2013-04-08       Impact factor: 1.637

10.  Hydroxyethyl starch versus Ringer solution in cardiopulmonary bypass prime solutions (a randomized controlled trial).

Authors:  Osman Tiryakioğlu; Gürdeniz Yildiz; Hakan Vural; Tugrul Goncu; Ahmet Ozyazicioglu; Senol Yavuz
Journal:  J Cardiothorac Surg       Date:  2008-07-12       Impact factor: 1.637

  10 in total
  2 in total

Review 1.  Starch Wars-New Episodes of the Saga. Changes in Regulations on Hydroxyethyl Starch in the European Union.

Authors:  Katja-Nicole Adamik; Ivayla D Yozova
Journal:  Front Vet Sci       Date:  2019-01-18

2.  The comparison of albumin and 6% hydroxyethyl starches (130/0.4) in cardiac surgery: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled clinical trials.

Authors:  Ling Wei; Dongping Li; Lin Sun
Journal:  BMC Surg       Date:  2021-09-11       Impact factor: 2.102

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.