Literature DB >> 20661198

Comparing the effects of 5% albumin and 6% hydroxyethyl starch 130/0.4 on coagulation and inflammatory response when used as priming solutions for cardiopulmonary bypass.

Y S Choi1, J K Shim, S W Hong, J C Kim, Y L Kwak.   

Abstract

AIM: This prospective, randomized and controlled trial compares the use of human albumin (HA) and hydroxyethyl starch (HES) 130/0.4 in the priming solution for a non-biocompatible cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB) circuit. The effects of each substance on coagulation, postoperative blood loss and pro-inflammatory activities were examined.
METHODS: Thirty-six adult patients undergoing mitral valvular heart surgery were randomly assigned to either the HA or HES group; 500 mL of 5% HA or 6% HES 130/0.4 were added to the priming solution of the CPB circuit for each group, respectively. Coagulation variables were measured perioperatively; these variables included thromboelastographic (TEG) parameters and pro-inflammatory markers such as interleukin (IL)-6, IL-8 and tumor necrotic factor (TNF)-a. Postoperative blood loss and transfusion requirements were also assessed.
RESULTS: There were no significant intergroup differences in the coagulation variables (including TEG parameters), serum concentrations of IL-6, IL-8 and TNF-a, and blood loss or transfusion requirements. TEG parameters, which indicate the speed of solid clot formation and the strength of the fibrin clot, decreased up to 4 hours after CPB in both groups. Serum concentrations of IL-6, IL-8 and TNF-a were higher up to 12 hours after surgery compared to baseline values in both groups. Hemoglobin levels and platelet counts were lower up to 12 hours after surgery compared to baseline values in both groups.
CONCLUSION: HES 130/0.4 was comparable to albumin as a component of the priming solution for a non-biocompatible CPB circuit. The two substances showed similar effects on coagulation variables, blood loss and pro-inflammatory activities in adult patients undergoing mitral valvular heart surgery.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20661198

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Minerva Anestesiol        ISSN: 0375-9393            Impact factor:   3.051


  19 in total

Review 1.  Attenuating the Systemic Inflammatory Response to Adult Cardiopulmonary Bypass: A Critical Review of the Evidence Base.

Authors:  R Clive Landis; Jeremiah R Brown; David Fitzgerald; Donald S Likosky; Linda Shore-Lesserson; Robert A Baker; John W Hammon
Journal:  J Extra Corpor Technol       Date:  2014-09

Review 2.  Hydroxyethyl starch for cardiovascular surgery: a systematic review of randomized controlled trials.

Authors:  Xue-Yin Shi; Zui Zou; Xing-Ying He; Hai-Tao Xu; Hong-Bin Yuan; Hu Liu
Journal:  Eur J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  2011-03-02       Impact factor: 2.953

Review 3.  Influence of hydroxyethyl starch (HES) 130/0.4 on hemostasis as measured by viscoelastic device analysis: a systematic review.

Authors:  Christiane S Hartog; Dorit Reuter; Wolfgang Loesche; Michael Hofmann; Konrad Reinhart
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  2011-10-12       Impact factor: 17.440

4.  The effects of tranexamic acid and 6% hydroxyethyl starch (HES) solution (130/0.4) on postoperative bleeding in coronary artery bypass graft (CABG) surgery.

Authors:  M Yanartas; A Baysal; C Aydın; Y Ay; I Kara; E Aydın; D Cevirme; C Köksal; H Sunar
Journal:  Int J Clin Exp Med       Date:  2015-04-15

Review 5.  Influence of cirrhosis in cardiac surgery outcomes.

Authors:  Juan C Lopez-Delgado; Francisco Esteve; Casimiro Javierre; Josep L Ventura; Rafael Mañez; Elisabet Farrero; Herminia Torrado; David Rodríguez-Castro; Maria L Carrio
Journal:  World J Hepatol       Date:  2015-04-18

6.  Comparison of Albumin, Hydroxyethyl Starch and Ringer Lactate Solution as Priming Fluid for Cardiopulmonary Bypass in Paediatric Cardiac Surgery.

Authors:  Jigar Patel; Mrugesh Prajapati; Atul Solanki; Himani Pandya
Journal:  J Clin Diagn Res       Date:  2016-06-01

7.  Tetrastarch in cardiac surgery: error, confounding and bias in a meta-analysis of randomized trials.

Authors:  Roberta J Navickis; Gary R Haynes; Mahlon M Wilkes
Journal:  Crit Care       Date:  2015-04-22       Impact factor: 9.097

8.  Hydroxyethyl starch versus other fluids for non-septic patients in the intensive care unit: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.

Authors:  Bin He; Bo Xu; Xiaoxing Xu; Lixia Li; Rongrong Ren; Zhiyu Chen; Jian Xiao; Yingwei Wang; Bin Xu
Journal:  Crit Care       Date:  2015-03-19       Impact factor: 9.097

9.  Assessment of hemostatic changes after crystalloid and colloid fluid preloading in trauma patients using standard coagulation parameters and thromboelastography.

Authors:  Chhavi Sawhney; Arulselvi Subramanian; Manpreet Kaur; Ajaz Anjum; Venencia Albert; Kapil Dev Soni; Ajit Kumar
Journal:  Saudi J Anaesth       Date:  2013-01

10.  Hydroxyethyl starch 6%, 130/0.4 vs. a balanced crystalloid solution in cardiopulmonary bypass priming: a randomized, prospective study.

Authors:  Hasan Alper Gurbuz; Ahmet Baris Durukan; Nevriye Salman; Murat Tavlasoglu; Elif Durukan; Halil İbrahim Ucar; Cem Yorgancioglu
Journal:  J Cardiothorac Surg       Date:  2013-04-08       Impact factor: 1.637

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.