Literature DB >> 27504042

Current Uses (and Potential Misuses) of Facebook: An Online Survey in Physiotherapy.

Maude Laliberté1, Camille Beaulieu-Poulin2, Alexandre Campeau Larrivée3, Maude Charbonneau3, Émilie Samson3, Debbie Ehrmann Feldman4.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: In recent years, the use of social media such as Facebook has become extremely popular and widespread in our society. Among users are health care professionals, who must develop ways to extend their professionalism online. Before issuing formal guidelines, policies, or recommendations to guide online behaviours, there is a need to know to what extent Facebook influences the professional life of physiotherapy professionals. Our goal was to explore knowledge and behaviour that physiotherapists and physical rehabilitation therapists practicing in Quebec have of Facebook.
METHOD: We used an empirical cross-sectional online survey design (n=322, response rate 4.5%).
RESULTS: The results showed that 84.3% of physiotherapy professionals had a Facebook account. Almost all had colleagues or former colleagues as Facebook friends, 21% had patients as friends, and 27% had employers as friends. More than a third of workplaces had clinic pages with information intended for the public. Regarding workplace Facebook policies, 37.3% said that there was no policy and another 41.6% were not aware whether there was one or not.
CONCLUSION: There appears to be a need to establish guidelines regarding the use of social media for physiotherapy professionals to ensure maintenance of professionalism and ethical conduct.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Facebook; ethics; professional; social media; survey

Year:  2016        PMID: 27504042      PMCID: PMC4961309          DOI: 10.3138/ptc.2014-41

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Physiother Can        ISSN: 0300-0508            Impact factor:   1.037


  24 in total

1.  Using the Internet to conduct surveys of health professionals: a valid alternative?

Authors:  Dejana Braithwaite; Jon Emery; Simon De Lusignan; Stephen Sutton
Journal:  Fam Pract       Date:  2003-10       Impact factor: 2.267

2.  In the 21st Century, what is an acceptable response rate?

Authors:  Susan M B Morton; Dinusha K Bandara; Elizabeth M Robinson; Polly E Atatoa Carr
Journal:  Aust N Z J Public Health       Date:  2012-04       Impact factor: 2.939

3.  Physician violations of online professionalism and disciplinary actions: a national survey of state medical boards.

Authors:  S Ryan Greysen; Katherine C Chretien; Terry Kind; Aaron Young; Cary P Gross
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2012-03-21       Impact factor: 56.272

4.  The intersection of online social networking with medical professionalism.

Authors:  Lindsay A Thompson; Kara Dawson; Richard Ferdig; Erik W Black; J Boyer; Jade Coutts; Nicole Paradise Black
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2008-07       Impact factor: 5.128

5.  A social media primer for professionals: digital dos and don'ts.

Authors:  Jay M Bernhardt; Julia Alber; Robert S Gold
Journal:  Health Promot Pract       Date:  2014-01-06

6.  Physicians on Twitter.

Authors:  Katherine C Chretien; Justin Azar; Terry Kind
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2011-02-09       Impact factor: 56.272

7.  Dangers and opportunities for social media in medicine.

Authors:  Daniel R George; Liza S Rovniak; Jennifer L Kraschnewski
Journal:  Clin Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2013-09       Impact factor: 2.190

8.  Take two aspirin and tweet me in the morning: how Twitter, Facebook, and other social media are reshaping health care.

Authors:  Carleen Hawn
Journal:  Health Aff (Millwood)       Date:  2009 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 6.301

9.  Content of weblogs written by health professionals.

Authors:  Tara Lagu; Elinore J Kaufman; David A Asch; Katrina Armstrong
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2008-07-23       Impact factor: 5.128

10.  Social media use among patients and caregivers: a scoping review.

Authors:  Michele P Hamm; Annabritt Chisholm; Jocelyn Shulhan; Andrea Milne; Shannon D Scott; Lisa M Given; Lisa Hartling
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2013-05-09       Impact factor: 2.692

View more
  7 in total

1.  Clinician's Commentary on Yoon et al.1.

Authors:  Judy King
Journal:  Physiother Can       Date:  2017       Impact factor: 1.037

2.  Clinician's Commentary on Laliberté et al.(1).

Authors:  Ian R Barrett
Journal:  Physiother Can       Date:  2016       Impact factor: 1.037

Review 3.  The use of social media among health professionals to facilitate chronic disease self-management with their patients: A systematic review.

Authors:  Gino De Angelis; George A Wells; Barbara Davies; Judy King; Shirin M Shallwani; Jessica McEwan; Sabrina Cavallo; Lucie Brosseau
Journal:  Digit Health       Date:  2018-05-03

4.  The use of social media by arthritis health professionals to disseminate a self-management program to patients: A feasibility study.

Authors:  Gino De Angelis; Barbara Davies; Judy King; George A Wells; Lucie Brosseau
Journal:  Digit Health       Date:  2017-04-08

Review 5.  Dangers and Benefits of Social Media on E-Professionalism of Health Care Professionals: Scoping Review.

Authors:  Tea Vukušić Rukavina; Joško Viskić; Lovela Machala Poplašen; Danko Relić; Marko Marelić; Drazen Jokic; Kristijan Sedak
Journal:  J Med Internet Res       Date:  2021-11-17       Impact factor: 5.428

6.  A Qualitative Exploration of the Teaching- and Learning-Related Content Nursing Students Share to Social Media.

Authors:  Catherine M Giroux; Katherine A Moreau
Journal:  Can J Nurs Res       Date:  2021-11-10

7.  Preserving professional identities, behaviors, and values in digital professionalism using social networking sites; a systematic review.

Authors:  Shaista Salman Guraya; Salman Yousuf Guraya; Muhamad Saiful Bahri Yusoff
Journal:  BMC Med Educ       Date:  2021-07-12       Impact factor: 2.463

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.