Literature DB >> 27503656

Gel-Entrapped Staphylococcus aureus Bacteria as Models of Biofilm Infection Exhibit Growth in Dense Aggregates, Oxygen Limitation, Antibiotic Tolerance, and Heterogeneous Gene Expression.

Breana Pabst1, Betsey Pitts2, Ellen Lauchnor3, Philip S Stewart4.   

Abstract

An experimental model that mimicked the structure and characteristics of in vivo biofilm infections, such as those occurring in the lung or in dermal wounds where no biomaterial surface is present, was developed. In these infections, microbial biofilm forms as cell aggregates interspersed in a layer of mucus or host matrix material. This structure was modeled by filling glass capillary tubes with an agarose gel that had been seeded with Staphylococcus aureus bacteria and then incubating the gel biofilm in medium for up to 30 h. Confocal microscopy showed that the bacteria formed in discrete pockets distributed throughout the gel matrix. These aggregates enlarged over time and also developed a size gradient, with the clusters being larger near the nutrient- and oxygen-supplied interface and smaller at greater depths. Bacteria entrapped in gels for 24 h grew slowly (specific growth rate, 0.06 h(-1)) and were much less susceptible to oxacillin, minocycline, or ciprofloxacin than planktonic cells. Microelectrode measurements showed that the oxygen concentration decreased with depth into the gel biofilm, falling to values less than 3% of air saturation at depths of 500 μm. An anaerobiosis-responsive green fluorescent protein reporter gene for lactate dehydrogenase was induced in the region of the gel where the measured oxygen concentrations were low, confirming biologically relevant hypoxia. These results show that the gel biofilm model captures key features of biofilm infection in mucus or compromised tissue: formation of dense, distinct aggregates, reduced specific growth rates, local hypoxia, and antibiotic tolerance.
Copyright © 2016, American Society for Microbiology. All Rights Reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27503656      PMCID: PMC5038234          DOI: 10.1128/AAC.01336-16

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother        ISSN: 0066-4804            Impact factor:   5.191


  50 in total

1.  A simple in vitro model for growth control of bacterial biofilms.

Authors:  A E Hodgson; S M Nelson; M R Brown; P Gilbert
Journal:  J Appl Bacteriol       Date:  1995-07

2.  Artificial biofilm model--a useful tool for biofilm research.

Authors:  M Strathmann; T Griebe; H C Flemming
Journal:  Appl Microbiol Biotechnol       Date:  2000-08       Impact factor: 4.813

Review 3.  Bacterial biofilms: a common cause of persistent infections.

Authors:  J W Costerton; P S Stewart; E P Greenberg
Journal:  Science       Date:  1999-05-21       Impact factor: 47.728

Review 4.  Diffusion in biofilms.

Authors:  Philip S Stewart
Journal:  J Bacteriol       Date:  2003-03       Impact factor: 3.490

5.  Resistance of artificial biofilms of Pseudomonas aeruginosa to imipenem and tobramycin.

Authors:  L Coquet; G A Junter; T Jouenne
Journal:  J Antimicrob Chemother       Date:  1998-12       Impact factor: 5.790

6.  Effects of reduced mucus oxygen concentration in airway Pseudomonas infections of cystic fibrosis patients.

Authors:  Dieter Worlitzsch; Robert Tarran; Martina Ulrich; Ute Schwab; Aynur Cekici; Keith C Meyer; Peter Birrer; Gabriel Bellon; Jürgen Berger; Tilo Weiss; Konrad Botzenhart; James R Yankaskas; Scott Randell; Richard C Boucher; Gerd Döring
Journal:  J Clin Invest       Date:  2002-02       Impact factor: 14.808

7.  Phosphate deprivation is associated with high resistance to latamoxef of gel-entrapped, sessile-like Escherichia coli cells.

Authors:  Sébastien Vilain; Pascal Cosette; Guy-Alain Junter; Thierry Jouenne
Journal:  J Antimicrob Chemother       Date:  2002-02       Impact factor: 5.790

8.  A rat model of chronic respiratory infection with Pseudomonas aeruginosa.

Authors:  H A Cash; D E Woods; B McCullough; W G Johanson; J A Bass
Journal:  Am Rev Respir Dis       Date:  1979-03

9.  Penetration of rifampin through Staphylococcus epidermidis biofilms.

Authors:  Zhilan Zheng; Philip S Stewart
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2002-03       Impact factor: 5.191

10.  Role of dose concentration in biocide efficacy against Pseudomonas aeruginosa biofilms.

Authors:  K J Grobe; J Zahller; P S Stewart
Journal:  J Ind Microbiol Biotechnol       Date:  2002-07       Impact factor: 3.346

View more
  25 in total

1.  Spatiotemporal mapping of oxygen in a microbially-impacted packed bed using 19F Nuclear magnetic resonance oximetry.

Authors:  Jeffrey W Simkins; Philip S Stewart; Joseph D Seymour
Journal:  J Magn Reson       Date:  2018-06-22       Impact factor: 2.229

2.  Antibiofilm Synergy of β-Lactams and Branched Polyethylenimine against Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus epidermidis.

Authors:  Anh K Lam; Cassandra L Wouters; Erika L Moen; Jennifer Pusavat; Charles V Rice
Journal:  Biomacromolecules       Date:  2019-08-30       Impact factor: 6.988

3.  Search for a Shared Genetic or Biochemical Basis for Biofilm Tolerance to Antibiotics across Bacterial Species.

Authors:  Philip S Stewart; Kerry S Williamson; Laura Boegli; Timothy Hamerly; Ben White; Liam Scott; Xiao Hu; Brendan M Mumey; Michael J Franklin; Brian Bothner; Francisco G Vital-Lopez; Anders Wallqvist; Garth A James
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2022-03-10       Impact factor: 5.938

4.  Non-invasive imaging of oxygen concentration in a complex in vitro biofilm infection model using 19 F MRI: Persistence of an oxygen sink despite prolonged antibiotic therapy.

Authors:  Jeffrey W Simkins; Philip S Stewart; Sarah L Codd; Joseph D Seymour
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  2019-08-02       Impact factor: 4.668

5.  Direct Microscopic Observation of Human Neutrophil-Staphylococcus aureus Interaction In Vitro Suggests a Potential Mechanism for Initiation of Biofilm Infection on an Implanted Medical Device.

Authors:  Niranjan Ghimire; Brian A Pettygrove; Kyler B Pallister; James Stangeland; Shelby Stanhope; Isaac Klapper; Jovanka M Voyich; Philip S Stewart
Journal:  Infect Immun       Date:  2019-11-18       Impact factor: 3.441

6.  Morphogenesis and cell ordering in confined bacterial biofilms.

Authors:  Qiuting Zhang; Jian Li; Japinder Nijjer; Haoran Lu; Mrityunjay Kothari; Ricard Alert; Tal Cohen; Jing Yan
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2021-08-03       Impact factor: 11.205

7.  Regulating Bacterial Behavior within Hydrogels of Tunable Viscoelasticity.

Authors:  Shardul Bhusari; Shrikrishnan Sankaran; Aránzazu Del Campo
Journal:  Adv Sci (Weinh)       Date:  2022-04-11       Impact factor: 17.521

8.  Hyperbaric Oxygen Sensitizes Anoxic Pseudomonas aeruginosa Biofilm to Ciprofloxacin.

Authors:  Mette Kolpen; Christian J Lerche; Kasper N Kragh; Thomas Sams; Klaus Koren; Anna S Jensen; Laura Line; Thomas Bjarnsholt; Oana Ciofu; Claus Moser; Michael Kühl; Niels Høiby; Peter Ø Jensen
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2017-10-24       Impact factor: 5.191

Review 9.  The Consequences of Being in an Infectious Biofilm: Microenvironmental Conditions Governing Antibiotic Tolerance.

Authors:  Majken Sønderholm; Thomas Bjarnsholt; Maria Alhede; Mette Kolpen; Peter Ø Jensen; Michael Kühl; Kasper N Kragh
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2017-12-12       Impact factor: 5.923

10.  Delayed neutrophil recruitment allows nascent Staphylococcus aureus biofilm formation and immune evasion.

Authors:  Brian A Pettygrove; Rachel M Kratofil; Maria Alhede; Peter Ø Jensen; Michelle Newton; Klaus Qvortrup; Kyler B Pallister; Thomas Bjarnsholt; Paul Kubes; Jovanka M Voyich; Philip S Stewart
Journal:  Biomaterials       Date:  2021-04-02       Impact factor: 15.304

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.