Literature DB >> 27502469

Validation of an algorithm to predict reulceration in amputation patients with diabetes.

Raúl J Molines-Barroso1, José L Lázaro-Martínez1, Francisco J Álvaro-Afonso1, Irene Sanz-Corbalán1, José L García-Klepzig2, Javier Aragón-Sánchez3.   

Abstract

The aim of this article was to assess the ability to predict reulceration in people with diabetes and a history of minor amputation according to the formula proposed by Miller et al. A retrospective study was performed on 156 consecutive records of patients with a recent history of simple or multiple forefoot amputation. The sample was divided according to Miller's formula into patients at low risk of reulceration and those at high risk; those were further divided into two subgroups according to whether or not the first segment of the forefoot had been amputated. Forty-eight (47·1%) individuals suffered forefoot reulceration, showing a median reulceration-free survival time of 8 months [interquartile range (IR) 3·6-14·8]. Nephropathy (P = 0.005) and Miller's formula (P = 0.028) were risk factors for reulceration-free survival time in the univariate analysis. The pattern relating to the first segment amputated [hazard ratio (HR) 2·853; P = 0·004; 95% confidence interval (CI) 1·391-5·849] and nephropathy (HR 2·468; P = 0.004; 95% CI 1.328-4.587) showed a significant hazard ratio in the multivariate Cox model. Participants with first segment amputation and one other amputation showed an association with the probability of reulceration in comparison with any other specific type of minor amputation.
© 2016 Medicalhelplines.com Inc and John Wiley & Sons Ltd.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Algorithm; Amputation; Disease-free survival; Ulcer

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27502469      PMCID: PMC7949664          DOI: 10.1111/iwj.12639

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int Wound J        ISSN: 1742-4801            Impact factor:   3.315


  22 in total

1.  Specific guidelines for the diagnosis and treatment of peripheral arterial disease in a patient with diabetes and ulceration of the foot 2011.

Authors:  N C Schaper; G Andros; J Apelqvist; K Bakker; J Lammer; M Lepantalo; J L Mills; J Reekers; C P Shearman; R E Zierler; R J Hinchliffe
Journal:  Diabetes Metab Res Rev       Date:  2012-02       Impact factor: 4.876

2.  Digital amputations in neuropathic feet.

Authors:  B Greteman; S Dale
Journal:  J Am Podiatr Med Assoc       Date:  1990-03

3.  Classifying diabetic foot surgery: toward a rational definition.

Authors:  D G Armstrong; R G Frykberg
Journal:  Diabet Med       Date:  2003-04       Impact factor: 4.359

4.  Risk of reamputation in diabetic patients stratified by limb and level of amputation: a 10-year observation.

Authors:  Yuki Izumi; Kathleen Satterfield; Shuko Lee; Lawrence B Harkless
Journal:  Diabetes Care       Date:  2006-03       Impact factor: 19.112

5.  2012 Infectious Diseases Society of America clinical practice guideline for the diagnosis and treatment of diabetic foot infections.

Authors:  Benjamin A Lipsky; Anthony R Berendt; Paul B Cornia; James C Pile; Edgar J G Peters; David G Armstrong; H Gunner Deery; John M Embil; Warren S Joseph; Adolf W Karchmer; Michael S Pinzur; Eric Senneville
Journal:  Clin Infect Dis       Date:  2012-06       Impact factor: 9.079

6.  The natural history of great toe amputations.

Authors:  D P Murdoch; D G Armstrong; J B Dacus; T J Laughlin; C B Morgan; L A Lavery
Journal:  J Foot Ankle Surg       Date:  1997 May-Jun       Impact factor: 1.286

7.  Practical criteria for screening patients at high risk for diabetic foot ulceration.

Authors:  L A Lavery; D G Armstrong; S A Vela; T L Quebedeaux; J G Fleischli
Journal:  Arch Intern Med       Date:  1998-01-26

8.  Ulcer recurrence following first ray amputation in diabetic patients: a cohort prospective study.

Authors:  Luca Dalla Paola; Ezio Faglia; Maurizio Caminiti; Giacomo Clerici; Sasa Ninkovic; Valter Deanesi
Journal:  Diabetes Care       Date:  2003-06       Impact factor: 19.112

Review 9.  Diabetic foot ulcer classification system for research purposes: a progress report on criteria for including patients in research studies.

Authors:  N C Schaper
Journal:  Diabetes Metab Res Rev       Date:  2004 May-Jun       Impact factor: 4.876

10.  Comprehensive foot examination and risk assessment: a report of the task force of the foot care interest group of the American Diabetes Association, with endorsement by the American Association of Clinical Endocrinologists.

Authors:  Andrew J M Boulton; David G Armstrong; Stephen F Albert; Robert G Frykberg; Richard Hellman; M Sue Kirkman; Lawrence A Lavery; Joseph W Lemaster; Joseph L Mills; Michael J Mueller; Peter Sheehan; Dane K Wukich
Journal:  Diabetes Care       Date:  2008-08       Impact factor: 19.112

View more
  4 in total

Review 1.  Optimal management of diabetic foot osteomyelitis: challenges and solutions.

Authors:  José Luis Lázaro Martínez; Yolanda García Álvarez; Aroa Tardáguila-García; Esther García Morales
Journal:  Diabetes Metab Syndr Obes       Date:  2019-06-21       Impact factor: 3.168

2.  Predictors of Diabetic Foot Reulceration beneath the Hallux.

Authors:  R J Molines-Barroso; J L Lázaro-Martínez; J V Beneit-Montesinos; F J Álvaro-Afonso; E García-Morales; Y García-Álvarez
Journal:  J Diabetes Res       Date:  2019-01-08       Impact factor: 4.011

3.  Differences in initial versus recurrent diabetic foot ulcers at a specialized tertiary diabetic foot care center in China.

Authors:  Yuxia Cheng; Ping Zu; Jie Zhao; Lintao Shi; Hongyan Shi; Mei Zhang; Aihong Wang
Journal:  J Int Med Res       Date:  2021-01       Impact factor: 1.671

4.  Effects of walking speeds and durations on the plantar pressure gradient and pressure gradient angle.

Authors:  Chi-Wen Lung; Pu-Chun Mo; Chunmei Cao; Keying Zhang; Fu-Lien Wu; Ben-Yi Liau; Yih-Kuen Jan
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2022-08-30       Impact factor: 2.562

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.