| Literature DB >> 27501842 |
Caroline Amour1, Jean Gratz2, Estomih Mduma1, Erling Svensen3, Elizabeth T Rogawski4, Monica McGrath5, Jessica C Seidman5, Benjamin J J McCormick5, Sanjaya Shrestha6, Amidou Samie7, Mustafa Mahfuz8, Shahida Qureshi9, Aneeta Hotwani9, Sudhir Babji10, Dixner Rengifo Trigoso11, Aldo A M Lima12, Ladaporn Bodhidatta6, Pascal Bessong7, Tahmeed Ahmed8, Sadia Shakoor9, Gagandeep Kang10, Margaret Kosek13, Richard L Guerrant4, Dennis Lang14, Michael Gottlieb14, Eric R Houpt4, James A Platts-Mills4.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Enteropathogen infections have been associated with enteric dysfunction and impaired growth in children in low-resource settings. In a multisite birth cohort study (MAL-ED), we describe the epidemiology and impact of Campylobacter infection in the first 2 years of life.Entities:
Keywords: Campylobacter; children; growth; inflammation; risk factors
Mesh:
Year: 2016 PMID: 27501842 PMCID: PMC5064165 DOI: 10.1093/cid/ciw542
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Clin Infect Dis ISSN: 1058-4838 Impact factor: 9.079
Figure 1.Campylobacter prevalence in diarrheal and nondiarrheal surveillance stool samples. Histogram shows proportions of diarrheal (black) and surveillance (gray) stool samples positive for Campylobacter by enzyme immunoassay by age at each site.
Risk Factors for Campylobacter Detection in Surveillance Stool Samples
| Risk Factors by Category | Risk Ratio (95% CI) | |
|---|---|---|
| Univariable Analysisa | Multivariable Analysisb | |
| Sociodemographic/maternal | ||
| Female sex | 1.06 (1.01–1.12) | 1.05 (1.00–1.11) |
| Low birth weight (WAZ score <2) | 0.95 (.89–1.03) | 0.93 (.87–1.00) |
| Crowding in the home | 1.19 (1.11–1.27) | 1.13 (1.05–1.21) |
| Maternal educational level <6 y | 1.16 (1.09–1.24) | 1.08 (1.01–1.15) |
| Monthly income <$150 | 1.14 (1.07–1.22) | 1.04 (.97–1.11) |
| Breastfeeding/diet | ||
| Proportion of breastfeeding in prior mo | ||
| Exclusive | 0.54 (.46–.62) | 0.56 (.47–.67) |
| Nonexclusive | 1.22 (1.14–1.30) | 1.02 (.95–1.10) |
| Consumption in prior mo | ||
| Water | 1.24 (1.13–1.36) | 1.06 (.96–1.17) |
| Animal milk | 1.06 (1.01–1.12) | … |
| Solid food | 1.21 (1.09–1.34) | … |
| Child observed to eat nonfood items | 1.08 (1.01–1.16) | … |
| Antibiotics in prior mo | 0.86 (.83–.89) | 0.86 (.83–.90) |
| Water | ||
| Routine treatment of drinking water | 0.72 (.66–.78) | 0.75 (.69–.82) |
| Improved source of drinking water | 0.93 (.82–1.04) | 0.96 (.85–1.07) |
| Poor access to water | 1.22 (1.10–1.34) | 1.16 (1.06–1.28) |
| Sanitation: access to an improved latrine | 0.85 (.78–.92) | 0.89 (.81–.97) |
| Environment | ||
| Dirt floor in home | 1.16 (1.07–1.25) | 1.04 (.96–1.13) |
| Chickens kept at home | 1.07 (.99–1.15) | 1.06 (.99–1.13) |
| Cattle kept at home | 1.04 (.96–1.12) | … |
| Agricultural land ownership | 0.99 (.92–1.07) | … |
Abbreviations: CI, confidence interval; WAZ score, weight-for-age Z score.
a Adjusted for age, sex, site, and season.
b Adjusted for age, site, season, and all variables included in multivariable model.
Figure 2.Site-level sensitivity analysis of risk factors for Campylobacter detection in surveillance stool samples. Risk ratios with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) are shown for risk factors of interest as identified in the overall model (Table 1). All estimates are adjusted for age, sex, season, and the factors shown in the figure. Factors that did not vary at each site were excluded. Abbreviation: WAZ score, weight-for-age Z score.
Association Between Antibiotic Class Administration in the Prior Month and Campylobacter Detection in Surveillance Stool Samples
| Antibiotic Class | Antibiotic Courses, No. | Risk Ratio (95% CI) |
|---|---|---|
| Macrolide | 2820 | 0.68 (.63–.74) |
| Cephalosporin | 3534 | 0.80 (.76–.85) |
| Fluoroquinolone | 692 | 0.89 (.78–1.02) |
| Penicillin | 6577 | 0.92 (.88–.96) |
| Metronidazole | 2289 | 0.95 (.87–1.02) |
| Other/unknown | 2761 | 0.95 (.89–1.02) |
| Sulfonamide | 1560 | 1.02 (.94–1.10) |
| Tetracycline | 42 | 1.03 (.58–1.83) |
Abbreviation: CI, confidence interval.
Figure 3.Timing and class of antibiotic use and Campylobacter detection in surveillance stool samples. Risk ratios and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) are derived from a single model adjusted for age, sex, site, season, and all shown windows for antibiotic use.
Figure 4.Association between Campylobacter burden and length attainment at 24 months. A, Left, Difference in model-predicted 24-month length-for-age Z (LAZ) score between 10th and 90th percentiles of Campylobacter burden and median Campylobacter burden, overall and at each site. Right, Campylobacter burden expressed as proportion of surveillance stool samples tested that were positive for Campylobacter. B, Same estimates for overall 10th and 90th percentiles of Campylobacter burden by age interval. Abbreviation: CI, confidence interval.
Figure 5.Association between Campylobacter detection and fecal markers of intestinal permeability and inflammation (A) and systemic inflammation (B). A, Difference in the log concentrations of neopterin, α-1-antitrypsin, and myeloperoxidase from surveillance stool samples associated with Campylobacter detection. B, Difference in model-predicted mean α-1-acid glycoprotein (AGP) concentrations between 10th and 90th percentiles of Campylobacter burden and median Campylobacter burden, both overall and at each site; blood samples were obtained at 7, 15, and 24 months of age. Abbreviation: CI, confidence interval.