Maria Bellumori1, Mehmet Uygur, Christopher A Knight. 1. 1Department of Kinesiology, California State University, Monterey Bay, Seaside, CA; 2Department of Health and Exercise Sciences, Rowan University, Glassboro, NJ; and 3Department of Kinesiology and Applied Physiology, University of Delaware, Newark, DE.
Abstract
PURPOSE: The aim was to determine the feasibility of a 6-wk speed-based exercise program that could be used to initiate new exercise behaviors and to improve rapid movement in older adults approaching frailty. METHODS: The intervention group included 14 older adults (3 males and 11 females; mean ± SD, age = 70± 7.6 yr, height = 1.6 ± 0.11 m, mass = 76.8 ± 12.0 kg, body mass index = 27.7 ± 4.7 kg·m). The control group included 12 older adults (6 males and 6 females; mean ± SD, age = 69.2 ± 6.9 yr, height = 1.7 ± 0.09 m, mass = 78.2 ± 10.9 kg, body mass index = 25.3 ± 2.7 kg·m). Subjects included active older adults, including regular exercisers, but none were engaged in sports or exercises with an emphasis on speed (e.g., cycling spin classes or tennis). Stationary recumbent cycling was selected to minimize fall risk, and low pedaling resistance reduced musculoskeletal and cardiovascular load. Two weekly 30-min exercise sessions consisted of interval training in which subjects pedaled at preferred cadence and performed ten 20-s fast cadence intervals separated by 40 s of active recovery at preferred cadence. RESULTS: Significant group-time interactions (P < 0.05) supported a 2-s improvement in the timed up and go test and a 34% improvement in rapid isometric knee extension contractions in the exercise group but not in controls. Central neural adaptations are suggested because this lower extremity exercise program also elicited significant improvements in the untrained upper extremities of the exercise group (elbow extension rate of force development scaling factor and Nine-Hole Peg Test, P < 0.05). CONCLUSION: These results demonstrate that a relatively low dose of speed-based exercise can improve neuromuscular function and tests of mobility in older adults. Such a program serves as a sensible precursor to subsequent, more vigorous training or as an adjunct to a program where a velocity emphasis is lacking.
RCT Entities:
PURPOSE: The aim was to determine the feasibility of a 6-wk speed-based exercise program that could be used to initiate new exercise behaviors and to improve rapid movement in older adults approaching frailty. METHODS: The intervention group included 14 older adults (3 males and 11 females; mean ± SD, age = 70 ± 7.6 yr, height = 1.6 ± 0.11 m, mass = 76.8 ± 12.0 kg, body mass index = 27.7 ± 4.7 kg·m). The control group included 12 older adults (6 males and 6 females; mean ± SD, age = 69.2 ± 6.9 yr, height = 1.7 ± 0.09 m, mass = 78.2 ± 10.9 kg, body mass index = 25.3 ± 2.7 kg·m). Subjects included active older adults, including regular exercisers, but none were engaged in sports or exercises with an emphasis on speed (e.g., cycling spin classes or tennis). Stationary recumbent cycling was selected to minimize fall risk, and low pedaling resistance reduced musculoskeletal and cardiovascular load. Two weekly 30-min exercise sessions consisted of interval training in which subjects pedaled at preferred cadence and performed ten 20-s fast cadence intervals separated by 40 s of active recovery at preferred cadence. RESULTS: Significant group-time interactions (P < 0.05) supported a 2-s improvement in the timed up and go test and a 34% improvement in rapid isometric knee extension contractions in the exercise group but not in controls. Central neural adaptations are suggested because this lower extremity exercise program also elicited significant improvements in the untrained upper extremities of the exercise group (elbow extension rate of force development scaling factor and Nine-Hole Peg Test, P < 0.05). CONCLUSION: These results demonstrate that a relatively low dose of speed-based exercise can improve neuromuscular function and tests of mobility in older adults. Such a program serves as a sensible precursor to subsequent, more vigorous training or as an adjunct to a program where a velocity emphasis is lacking.
Authors: Wojtek J Chodzko-Zajko; David N Proctor; Maria A Fiatarone Singh; Christopher T Minson; Claudio R Nigg; George J Salem; James S Skinner Journal: Med Sci Sports Exerc Date: 2009-07 Impact factor: 5.411
Authors: Roger A Fielding; Nathan K LeBrasseur; Anthony Cuoco; Jonathan Bean; Kelly Mizer; Maria A Fiatarone Singh Journal: J Am Geriatr Soc Date: 2002-04 Impact factor: 5.562
Authors: Matthew J Jackson; Denise M Roche; Farzad Amirabdollahian; Stefan Koehn; Omid A Khaiyat Journal: Sports Health Date: 2019-11-11 Impact factor: 3.843
Authors: Susan M Linder; Sara Davidson; Anson Rosenfeldt; John Lee; Mandy Miller Koop; Francois Bethoux; Jay L Alberts Journal: Arch Phys Med Rehabil Date: 2020-09-09 Impact factor: 3.966