Literature DB >> 29785485

Peg-manipulation capabilities of middle-aged adults have a greater influence on pegboard times than those of young and old adults.

Awad M Almuklass1,2, Daniel F Feeney3, Diba Mani3, Landon D Hamilton3, Roger M Enoka3.   

Abstract

Declines in manual dexterity are frequently quantified as the time it takes to complete the grooved pegboard test. The test requires individuals to manipulate 25 pegs, one at a time, by removing them from a well and inserting them into a prescribed hole. The manipulation of each peg involves four phases: selection, transport, insertion, and return. The purpose of our study was to compare the times to complete the four phases of peg manipulation and the forces applied to the pegboard during peg insertion as young, middle-aged, and old adults performed the grooved pegboard test. The relative significance of the peg-manipulation attributes for 30 young (24.0 ± 4.4 years), 15 middle-aged (46.5 ± 6.5 years), and 15 old (70.4 ± 4.0 years) adults was assessed with a multiple-regression analysis. The grooved pegboard test was performed on a force plate. Pegboard times for the old adults (81 ± 17 s) were longer than those for young (56 ± 7 s) and middle-aged (58 ± 11 s) adults. Regression analysis indicated that the explanatory variables for the pegboard times of young (R2 = 0.33) and middle-aged (R2 = 0.78) adults were the times for the peg insertion and return phases, whereas the predictors for old adults (R2 = 0.49) were the times for the peg selection and transport phases. The relative influence of peg-manipulation capabilities on a pegboard test of manual dexterity was greater for middle-aged adults than for young and old adults.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Aging; Grooved pegboard test; Manual dexterity

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29785485     DOI: 10.1007/s00221-018-5294-3

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Exp Brain Res        ISSN: 0014-4819            Impact factor:   1.972


  39 in total

1.  Mode of hand training determines cortical reorganisation: a randomized controlled study in healthy adults.

Authors:  Christina Brogårdh; Fredrik W Johansson; Frida Nygren; Bengt H Sjölund
Journal:  J Rehabil Med       Date:  2010-09       Impact factor: 2.912

2.  High frequency sensory stimulation improves tactile but not motor performance in older adults.

Authors:  Claudia Voelcker-Rehage; Ben Godde
Journal:  Motor Control       Date:  2010-10       Impact factor: 1.422

3.  Motor tests and cognition in healthy older adults.

Authors:  Lee Ashendorf; Jana L Vanderslice-Barr; Robert J McCaffrey
Journal:  Appl Neuropsychol       Date:  2009-07

4.  Edinburgh Handedness Inventory - Short Form: a revised version based on confirmatory factor analysis.

Authors:  Jaimie F Veale
Journal:  Laterality       Date:  2013-05-10

5.  Age- and sex-related changes in vibrotactile sensitivity of hand and face in neurotypical adults.

Authors:  Lalit Venkatesan; Steven M Barlow; Douglas Kieweg
Journal:  Somatosens Mot Res       Date:  2014-09-24       Impact factor: 1.111

6.  Assessing dexterity function: a comparison of two alternatives for the NIH Toolbox.

Authors:  Ying-Chih Wang; Susan R Magasi; Richard W Bohannon; David B Reuben; Heather E McCreath; Deborah J Bubela; Richard C Gershon; William Z Rymer
Journal:  J Hand Ther       Date:  2011-07-28       Impact factor: 1.950

7.  Effects of a new sensory re-education training tool on hand sensibility and manual dexterity in people with multiple sclerosis.

Authors:  Alon Kalron; Michal Greenberg-Abrahami; Simona Gelav; Anat Achiron
Journal:  NeuroRehabilitation       Date:  2013       Impact factor: 2.138

8.  Two common tests of dexterity can stratify upper limb motor function after stroke.

Authors:  Angelica G Thompson-Butel; Gaven G Lin; Christine T Shiner; Penelope A McNulty
Journal:  Neurorehabil Neural Repair       Date:  2014-03-13       Impact factor: 3.919

9.  The manual function test: norms for 20- to 90-year-olds and effects of age, gender, and hand dominance on dexterity.

Authors:  Akira Michimata; Takeo Kondo; Yoshimi Suzukamo; Mirei Chiba; Shin-Ichi Izumi
Journal:  Tohoku J Exp Med       Date:  2008-03       Impact factor: 1.848

10.  Outcome measures for hand function naturally reveal three latent domains in older adults: strength, coordinated upper extremity function, and sensorimotor processing.

Authors:  Emily L Lawrence; Sudarshan Dayanidhi; Isabella Fassola; Philip Requejo; Caroline Leclercq; Carolee J Winstein; Francisco J Valero-Cuevas
Journal:  Front Aging Neurosci       Date:  2015-06-05       Impact factor: 5.750

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.