Literature DB >> 21410084

LASIK flap thickness profile and reproducibility of the standard vs zero compression Hansatome microkeratomes: three-dimensional display with Artemis VHF digital ultrasound.

Dan Z Reinstein1, Timothy J Archer, Marine Gobbe.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To measure the mean flap thickness profile and calculate accuracy and reproducibility for standard and zero compression Hansatome microkeratomes (Bausch & Lomb).
METHODS: Retrospective study of 99 myopic eyes (51 patients) after LASIK using the standard or zero compression Hansatome microkeratomes (160-μm head). Reinstein Flap Thickness was calculated as preoperative epithelial thickness plus postoperative stromal component of the flap as measured by Artemis VHF digital ultrasound (ArcScan Inc). Mean and standard deviation flap thickness were calculated and plotted for a 10-mm diameter. Accuracy was calculated as the difference between the mean and intended flap thickness. Reproducibility was evaluated as the flap thickness standard deviation between eyes. Multivariate regression was performed for flap thickness against surgery order, atmospheric/vacuum pressure difference, spherical equivalent refraction, pachymetry, and keratometry.
RESULTS: For both Hansatome models, the mean flap thickness profile showed a thinnest region inferotemporally and thicker in the periphery of the inferotemporal edge and nasally. Mean central flap thickness was 140.3±17.5 μm (accuracy: -19.7 μm) and 119.0±12.7 μm (accuracy: -41.0 μm) for standard and zero compression Hansatomes, respectively. Eyes treated second were thinner (15.4 μm and 12.6 μm thinner for standard and zero compression Hansatomes, respectively). Multivariate regression improved the reproducibility to 14.8 μm (P<.05; surgery order, pachymetry) and 9.4 μm (P<.05; surgery order, atmospheric/vacuum pressure difference) for standard and zero compression Hansatomes, respectively.
CONCLUSIONS: The flap thickness profiles were similar for standard and zero compression Hansatomes characterized by a thinnest region inferotemporally, rather than a meniscus shape as has been suggested previously. The zero compression Hansatome created thinner, more reproducible flaps. Surgery order and atmospheric/vacuum pressure difference might be used to obtain thinner flaps using a Hansatome. Copyright 2011, SLACK Incorporated.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 21410084     DOI: 10.3928/1081597X-20101110-01

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Refract Surg        ISSN: 1081-597X            Impact factor:   3.573


  8 in total

1.  Artemis very high frequency digital ultrasound-guided femtosecond laser recut after flap complication.

Authors:  Dan Z Reinstein; Zachary Dickeson; Timothy J Archer; Marine Gobbe
Journal:  Digit J Ophthalmol       Date:  2014-09-14

2.  Evaluation of morphological features: femtosecond-LASIK flap vs. SMILE cap, and the effects on corneal higher-order aberrations.

Authors:  Xiaoying He; Qin He; Minjie Yuan; Zhi Fang; Kai Zhang; Tiepei Zhu; Wei Han
Journal:  Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol       Date:  2022-09-27       Impact factor: 3.535

3.  Comparison of corneal flaps created by Wavelight FS200 and Intralase FS60 femtosecond lasers.

Authors:  Qian Liu; Yue-Hua Zhou; Jing Zhang; Yan Zheng; Chang-Bin Zhai; Jing Liu
Journal:  Int J Ophthalmol       Date:  2016-07-18       Impact factor: 1.779

4.  The Impact of Flap Creation Methods for Sub-Bowman's Keratomileusis (SBK) on the Central Thickness of Bowman's Layer.

Authors:  Zhe Xu; Meixiao Shen; Liang Hu; Xiran Zhuang; Mei Peng; Di Hu; Jing Liu; Jianhua Wang; Jia Qu; Fan Lu
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-05-04       Impact factor: 3.240

5.  Three-dimensional LASIK flap thickness variability: topographic central, paracentral and peripheral assessment, in flaps created by a mechanical microkeratome (M2) and two different femtosecond lasers (FS60 and FS200).

Authors:  A John Kanellopoulos; George Asimellis
Journal:  Clin Ophthalmol       Date:  2013-04-03

Review 6.  Small incision lenticule extraction (SMILE) history, fundamentals of a new refractive surgery technique and clinical outcomes.

Authors:  Dan Z Reinstein; Timothy J Archer; Marine Gobbe
Journal:  Eye Vis (Lond)       Date:  2014-10-16

Review 7.  Cornea and anterior eye assessment with slit lamp biomicroscopy, specular microscopy, confocal microscopy, and ultrasound biomicroscopy.

Authors:  Raul Martin
Journal:  Indian J Ophthalmol       Date:  2018-02       Impact factor: 1.848

8.  Investigation of predictability and influence factors of the achieved lenticule thickness in small incision lenticule extraction.

Authors:  Fang Wu; Houfa Yin; Xinyi Chen; Yabo Yang
Journal:  BMC Ophthalmol       Date:  2020-03-17       Impact factor: 2.209

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.