Literature DB >> 27499965

Robotic-assisted thoracoscopic sleeve lobectomy for locally advanced lung cancer.

Mong-Wei Lin1, Shuenn-Wen Kuo1, Shun-Mao Yang1, Jang-Ming Lee1.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The Da Vinci robotic system has been used to enhance the surgeon's visualization and agility in lung cancer surgery, and thus facilitate refined dissection, knot tying and suturing. However, only a few case reports exist on performing a sleeve lobectomy with a robotic-assisted thoracoscopic surgery (RATS) technique. Here we describe our early experience performing RATS sleeve lobectomies. To our knowledge, this is the first study reporting a series of RATS sleeve lobectomies.
METHODS: The six consecutive NSCLC patients who underwent a RATS sleeve lobectomy between November 2013 and July 2015 at the National Taiwan University Hospital were enrolled in this study. The lobectomies were all performed by the same surgeon using a three-arm robotic system with an additional utility incision made for assistance and specimen retrieval.
RESULTS: Five patients were diagnosed with squamous cell carcinoma, while the sixth was diagnosed with a carcinoid tumor. The mean operation time was 436.7 [255-745] minutes. The mean postoperative intensive care unit (ICU) stay and hospital stay were 3.7 [1-11] and 11.3 [3-26] days, respectively. Two (33.3%; 2/6) morbidities were noted, including one pneumonia and one anastomosis stricture. There were no cases of mortality or of conversion to thoracotomy.
CONCLUSIONS: Our experience performing a RATS sleeve lobectomy in the six patients demonstrated the feasibility of RATS in complex lung cancer surgeries. The three-dimensional vision and articulated joint instruments made robotic-assisted bronchial anastomosis easier under the endoscopic setting. Our experience suggests that RATS offers specific advantages with regard to accuracy and safety when performing sleeve lobectomies.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Robotic sugery; lung cancer surgery; sleeve lobectomy

Year:  2016        PMID: 27499965      PMCID: PMC4958819          DOI: 10.21037/jtd.2016.06.14

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Thorac Dis        ISSN: 2072-1439            Impact factor:   2.895


  20 in total

1.  Early experience with robotic technology for thoracoscopic surgery.

Authors:  Franca M A Melfi; Gian Franco Menconi; A Massimo Mariani; Carlo Alberto Angeletti
Journal:  Eur J Cardiothorac Surg       Date:  2002-05       Impact factor: 4.191

2.  Early experience with robotic lung resection results in similar operative outcomes and morbidity when compared with matched video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery cases.

Authors:  Brian E Louie; Alexander S Farivar; Ralph W Aye; Eric Vallières
Journal:  Ann Thorac Surg       Date:  2012-03-20       Impact factor: 4.330

3.  Thoracoscopic robot-assisted bronchoplasty.

Authors:  N Ishikawa; Y S Sun; L W Nifong; W R Chitwood; M Oda; Y Ohta; G Watanabe
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2006-11       Impact factor: 4.584

4.  Thoracoscopic lobectomy is associated with lower morbidity than open lobectomy: a propensity-matched analysis from the STS database.

Authors:  Subroto Paul; Nasser K Altorki; Shubin Sheng; Paul C Lee; David H Harpole; Mark W Onaitis; Brendon M Stiles; Jeffrey L Port; Thomas A D'Amico
Journal:  J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg       Date:  2010-02       Impact factor: 5.209

5.  Hybrid video-assisted thoracic surgery-robotic minimally invasive right upper lobe sleeve lobectomy.

Authors:  Thomas Schmid; Florian Augustin; Gerhard Kainz; Johann Pratschke; Johannes Bodner
Journal:  Ann Thorac Surg       Date:  2011-06       Impact factor: 4.330

6.  A successful case of robotic bronchoplastic lobectomy for lung cancer.

Authors:  Hiroshige Nakamura; Yuji Taniguchi; Ken Miwa; Shinji Fujioka; Yuki Matsuoka; Yasuaki Kubouchi
Journal:  Ann Thorac Cardiovasc Surg       Date:  2012-11-30       Impact factor: 1.520

7.  Outcomes after lobectomy using thoracoscopy vs thoracotomy: a comparative effectiveness analysis utilizing the Nationwide Inpatient Sample database.

Authors:  Subroto Paul; Art Sedrakyan; Ya-Lin Chiu; Abu Nasar; Jeffrey L Port; Paul C Lee; Brendon M Stiles; Nasser K Altorki
Journal:  Eur J Cardiothorac Surg       Date:  2012-07-22       Impact factor: 4.191

8.  Video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery is more favorable than thoracotomy for resection of clinical stage I non-small cell lung cancer.

Authors:  Bryan A Whitson; Rafael S Andrade; Adam Boettcher; Ricardo Bardales; Robert A Kratzke; Peter S Dahlberg; Michael A Maddaus
Journal:  Ann Thorac Surg       Date:  2007-06       Impact factor: 4.330

9.  Video-assisted thoracic surgery sleeve lobectomy: a case series.

Authors:  Ali Mahtabifard; Clark B Fuller; Robert J McKenna
Journal:  Ann Thorac Surg       Date:  2008-02       Impact factor: 4.330

10.  Video-assisted thoracic surgery lobectomy with bronchoplasty for lung cancer: initial experience and techniques.

Authors:  Kozo Nakanishi
Journal:  Ann Thorac Surg       Date:  2007-07       Impact factor: 4.330

View more
  10 in total

1.  Initial Results of Robotic Surgery for Primary Lung Cancer: Feasibility, Safety and Learning Curve.

Authors:  Yuji Taniguchi; Hiroshige Nakamura; Ken Miwa; Tomohiro Haruki; Kunio Araki; Yuzo Takagi; Makoto Wakahara; Yohei Yurugi; Yasuaki Kubouchi; Takashi Ohno; Yoshiteru Kidokoro; Wakako Fujiwara
Journal:  Yonago Acta Med       Date:  2017-09-15       Impact factor: 1.641

2.  Robotic sleeve lobectomy-recent advances.

Authors:  Ben Shanahan; Katie E O'Sullivan; Karen C Redmond
Journal:  J Thorac Dis       Date:  2019-04       Impact factor: 2.895

3.  Robotic-assisted thoracic surgery: a helpful tool or just another expensive gadget?

Authors:  Florian Augustin; Johannes Bodner
Journal:  J Thorac Dis       Date:  2017-09       Impact factor: 2.895

4.  The long-term oncologic outcomes of robot-assisted bronchial single sleeve lobectomy for 104 consecutive patients with centrally located non-small cell lung cancer.

Authors:  Ao Liu; Yandong Zhao; Tong Qiu; Yunpeng Xuan; Yi Qin; Xiao Sun; Rongjian Xu; Wenxing Du; Zhe Wu; Giulia Veronesi; Dario Amore; Wenjie Jiao
Journal:  Transl Lung Cancer Res       Date:  2022-05

5.  An antiquated contraindication for minimally invasive lung surgery: No place to staple the bronchus.

Authors:  Tuğba Coşgun; Erkan Kaba; Kemal Ayalp; Alper Toker
Journal:  Turk Gogus Kalp Damar Cerrahisi Derg       Date:  2019-10-23       Impact factor: 0.332

6.  Robotic sleeve lobectomy with four arms for lung cancer centrally located in the right lower lobe: a case report.

Authors:  Min Seop Jo; Do Yeon Kim; Jin Yong Jeong; Geun Dong Lee
Journal:  J Cardiothorac Surg       Date:  2017-11-29       Impact factor: 1.637

7.  Comparison of Sleeve Lobectomy for Lung Cancer Using Mini-Thoracotomy and an Optimized Robot-Assisted Technique.

Authors:  Tao Shaolin; Feng Yonggeng; Kang Poming; Mei Longyong; Shen Cheng; Fang Chunshu; Wu Licheng; Tan Qunyou; Deng Bo
Journal:  Technol Cancer Res Treat       Date:  2021 Jan-Dec

8.  Automated 3D Segmentation of the Aorta and Pulmonary Artery on Non-Contrast-Enhanced Chest Computed Tomography Images in Lung Cancer Patients.

Authors:  Hao-Jen Wang; Li-Wei Chen; Hsin-Ying Lee; Yu-Jung Chung; Yan-Ting Lin; Yi-Chieh Lee; Yi-Chang Chen; Chung-Ming Chen; Mong-Wei Lin
Journal:  Diagnostics (Basel)       Date:  2022-04-12

9.  Robotic sleeve resection for pulmonary disease.

Authors:  Chengqiang Li; Bin Zhou; Yu Han; Runsen Jin; Jie Xiang; Hecheng Li
Journal:  World J Surg Oncol       Date:  2018-04-02       Impact factor: 2.754

10.  Early Outcomes of Robotic Versus Video-Assisted Thoracoscopic Anatomical Resection for Lung Cancer.

Authors:  Ji Hyeon Park; Samina Park; Chang Hyun Kang; Bub Se Na; So Young Bae; Kwon Joong Na; Hyun Joo Lee; In Kyu Park; Young Tae Kim
Journal:  J Chest Surg       Date:  2022-02-05
  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.