Literature DB >> 27499948

Long-term performance of the second-generation cobalt-chromium sirolimus-eluting stents in real-world clinical practice: 3-year clinical outcomes from the prospective multicenter FOCUS registry.

Feng Zhang1, Ji'e Yang1, Juying Qian1, Lei Ge1, Jun Zhou1, Junbo Ge1.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The short- and mid-term outcomes of the second-generation cobalt-chromium sirolimus-eluting stent (CoCr-SES) in real-world patients had been reported previously, but the long-term performance remained unclear. The objective of this analysis was to evaluate the long-term safety and efficacy of the second-generation CoCr-SES from the FOCUS registry.
METHODS: The FOCUS registry (ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT00868829) enrolled all-comers eligible to receive Firebird-2 CoCr-SES. Follow-up was continued to 3 years to evaluate long-term safety and effectiveness of the second-generation CoCr-SES in real-world practice. Results of the extended-use group and standard-use group are compared to explore performance of CoCr-SES in more severe patients with more complex lesions.
RESULTS: The rate of 3-year MACE was 7.37%, consisting of 84 cases (1.78%) of cardiac death, 166 cases (3.52%) of MI and 98 cases (2.08%) of TVR. ARC definite/probable stent thrombosis happened in 34 (0.72%) patients, only 3 new cases (<0.1%) of very late stent thrombosis was reported in the third year. Meanwhile, the difference of MACE (7.77% vs. 6.06%; P=0.058), TLF (4.71% vs. 3.49%; P=0.085) and ARC definite/probable stent thrombosis (0.83% vs. 0.37%; P=0.116) between extended-use group and standard-use group showed no significance.
CONCLUSIONS: The second-generation CoCr-SES was associated with continued low rates of 3-year MACE, TLF and stent thrombosis in a broad spectrum of patients.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Sirolimus-eluting stent (SES); cobalt-chromium; coronary artery disease

Year:  2016        PMID: 27499948      PMCID: PMC4958834          DOI: 10.21037/jtd.2016.05.11

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Thorac Dis        ISSN: 2072-1439            Impact factor:   2.895


  28 in total

Review 1.  Very late stent thrombosis in patients with first-generation drug-eluting stents: a systematic review of reported cases.

Authors:  Caroline Franck; Mark J Eisenberg; Tara Dourian; Sonia M Grandi; Kristian B Filion
Journal:  Int J Cardiol       Date:  2014-11-05       Impact factor: 4.164

2.  Everolimus-eluting versus paclitaxel-eluting stents in coronary artery disease.

Authors:  Gregg W Stone; Ali Rizvi; William Newman; Kourosh Mastali; John C Wang; Ronald Caputo; Julie Doostzadeh; Sherry Cao; Charles A Simonton; Krishnankutty Sudhir; Alexandra J Lansky; Donald E Cutlip; Dean J Kereiakes
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2010-05-06       Impact factor: 91.245

3.  Comparison of everolimus-eluting and sirolimus-eluting coronary stents: 1-year outcomes from the Randomized Evaluation of Sirolimus-eluting Versus Everolimus-eluting stent Trial (RESET).

Authors:  Takeshi Kimura; Takeshi Morimoto; Masahiro Natsuaki; Hiroki Shiomi; Keiichi Igarashi; Kazushige Kadota; Kengo Tanabe; Yoshihiro Morino; Takashi Akasaka; Yoshiki Takatsu; Hideo Nishikawa; Yoshito Yamamoto; Yoshihisa Nakagawa; Yasuhiko Hayashi; Masashi Iwabuchi; Hisashi Umeda; Kazuya Kawai; Hisayuki Okada; Kazuo Kimura; Charles A Simonton; Ken Kozuma
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  2012-07-23       Impact factor: 29.690

4.  Long-term comparison of everolimus-eluting and sirolimus-eluting stents for coronary revascularization.

Authors:  Lorenz Räber; Peter Jüni; Eveline Nüesch; Bindu Kalesan; Peter Wenaweser; Aris Moschovitis; Ahmed A Khattab; Maryam Bahlo; Mario Togni; Stéphane Cook; Rolf Vogel; Christian Seiler; Bernhard Meier; Stephan Windecker
Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol       Date:  2011-05-24       Impact factor: 24.094

5.  Three-year outcomes following sirolimus- versus paclitaxel-eluting stent implantation in an unselected population with coronary artery disease (from the REWARDS Registry).

Authors:  Nicholas N Hanna; Michael A Gaglia; Rebecca Torguson; Itsik Ben-Dor; Manuel A Gonzalez; Sara D Collins; Asmir I Syed; Gabriel Maluenda; Kimberly Kaneshige; Zhenyi Xue; Lowell F Satler; Kenneth M Kent; William O Suddath; Augusto D Pichard; Ron Waksman
Journal:  Am J Cardiol       Date:  2010-08-15       Impact factor: 2.778

6.  Long-term clinical and economic analysis of the Endeavor zotarolimus-eluting stent versus the cypher sirolimus-eluting stent: 3-year results from the ENDEAVOR III trial (Randomized Controlled Trial of the Medtronic Endeavor Drug [ABT-578] Eluting Coronary Stent System Versus the Cypher Sirolimus-Eluting Coronary Stent System in De Novo Native Coronary Artery Lesions).

Authors:  Eric L Eisenstein; Martin B Leon; David E Kandzari; Laura Mauri; Rex Edwards; David F Kong; Patricia A Cowper; Kevin J Anstrom
Journal:  JACC Cardiovasc Interv       Date:  2009-12       Impact factor: 11.195

7.  A polymer-based, paclitaxel-eluting stent in patients with coronary artery disease.

Authors:  Gregg W Stone; Stephen G Ellis; David A Cox; James Hermiller; Charles O'Shaughnessy; James Tift Mann; Mark Turco; Ronald Caputo; Patrick Bergin; Joel Greenberg; Jeffrey J Popma; Mary E Russell
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2004-01-15       Impact factor: 91.245

8.  Three-year patient-related and stent-related outcomes of second-generation everolimus-eluting Xience V stents versus zotarolimus-eluting resolute stents in real-world practice (from the Multicenter Prospective EXCELLENT and RESOLUTE-Korea Registries).

Authors:  Joo Myung Lee; Kyung Woo Park; Jung-Kyu Han; Han-Mo Yang; Hyun-Jae Kang; Bon-Kwon Koo; Jang-Whan Bae; Sung-Il Woo; Jin Sik Park; Dong-Kyu Jin; Dong Woon Jeon; Seok Kyu Oh; Jong-Seon Park; Doo-Il Kim; Min Su Hyon; Hui-Kyung Jeon; Do-Sun Lim; Myeong-Gon Kim; Seung-Woon Rha; Sung-Ho Her; Jin-Yong Hwang; Sanghyun Kim; Young Jin Choi; Jin Ho Kang; Keon-Woong Moon; Yangsoo Jang; Hyo-Soo Kim
Journal:  Am J Cardiol       Date:  2014-08-12       Impact factor: 2.778

9.  Sirolimus-eluting cobalt alloyed stents in treating patients with coronary artery disease: six-month angiographic and one-year clinical follow-up result. A prospective, historically controlled, multi-center clinical study.

Authors:  Qi Zhang; Bo Xu; Yue-jin Yang; Rui-yan Zhang; Jian-ping Li; Shu-bin Qiao; Jian-sheng Zhang; Jian Hu; Xue-wen Qin; Tao Hong; Ji-lin Chen; Yong Huo; Wei-feng Shen; Run-lin Gao
Journal:  Chin Med J (Engl)       Date:  2007-04-05       Impact factor: 2.628

Review 10.  Stent thrombosis and restenosis: what have we learned and where are we going? The Andreas Grüntzig Lecture ESC 2014.

Authors:  Robert A Byrne; Michael Joner; Adnan Kastrati
Journal:  Eur Heart J       Date:  2015-09-28       Impact factor: 29.983

View more
  2 in total

1.  Gender-Related Differences in Clinical Characteristics and Outcomes of Premature Coronary Artery Disease: Insight from the FOCUS Registry.

Authors:  Ya'nan Qu; Ji'e Yang; Feng Zhang; Chenguang Li; Yuxiang Dai; Hongbo Yang; Yang Gao; Yueyi Pan; Kang Yao; Dong Huang; Hao Lu; Jianying Ma; Juying Qian; Junbo Ge
Journal:  J Interv Cardiol       Date:  2019-07-11       Impact factor: 2.279

2.  Ticagrelor versus Clopidogrel in Patients with Severe Renal Insufficiency Undergoing PCI for Acute Coronary Syndrome.

Authors:  Yunxian Chen; Shaowen Tu; Zhixin Chen; Jue Xia; Baofeng Chen; Jinfeng Chen; Jiarong Liang; Xiangyang Liu; Liangqiu Tang
Journal:  J Interv Cardiol       Date:  2022-07-31       Impact factor: 1.776

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.