Kelly H Bruce1, Rebecca J Schwei2, Linda S Park3, Elizabeth A Jacobs4. 1. University of Wisconsin School of Medicine and Public Health, Madison, WI, USA. 2. Department of Medicine, University of Wisconsin School of Medicine and Public Health, Madison, WI, USA. 3. School of Social Work, University of Wisconsin, Madison, WI, USA. 4. Department of Medicine, University of Wisconsin School of Medicine and Public Health, Madison, WI, USA; Department of Population Health Sciences, University of Wisconsin School of Medicine and Public Health, Madison, WI, USA.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Limited English proficient (LEP) patients receive fewer recommended preventive screenings than English-speaking patients. Studies have explored patients' perceptions of the factors that contribute to this disparity, but little research has focused on physicians' perceptions. OBJECTIVE: To describe physicians' perceptions of the barriers and facilitators to preventive cancer screening in LEP patients. DESIGN: Qualitative interview study using a semi-structured interview guide. PARTICIPANTS: Eight primary care physicians from Wisconsin. APPROACH: Each interview was systematically coded to illuminate important themes. KEY RESULTS: A variety of barriers specifically hinder LEP patients' receipt of cancer screening, including poor language proficiency, lack of transportation, unfamiliarity with the concept of prevention, complex scheduling systems, poor interpretation, and limited physician time to discuss preventive care. While physicians identified many factors that facilitate preventive screening in general, they mentioned few that are perceived as specific to LEP patients. CONCLUSION: We found that primary care physicians attribute the low rates of preventive cancer screening among LEP populations to a variety of patient, provider, interpreter, and system factors, most of which go beyond simple language barriers. Interventions designed to reduce these barriers and enhance the impact of identified facilitators should be multifactorial and designed to engage primary care physicians.
BACKGROUND: Limited English proficient (LEP) patients receive fewer recommended preventive screenings than English-speaking patients. Studies have explored patients' perceptions of the factors that contribute to this disparity, but little research has focused on physicians' perceptions. OBJECTIVE: To describe physicians' perceptions of the barriers and facilitators to preventive cancer screening in LEP patients. DESIGN: Qualitative interview study using a semi-structured interview guide. PARTICIPANTS: Eight primary care physicians from Wisconsin. APPROACH: Each interview was systematically coded to illuminate important themes. KEY RESULTS: A variety of barriers specifically hinder LEP patients' receipt of cancer screening, including poor language proficiency, lack of transportation, unfamiliarity with the concept of prevention, complex scheduling systems, poor interpretation, and limited physician time to discuss preventive care. While physicians identified many factors that facilitate preventive screening in general, they mentioned few that are perceived as specific to LEP patients. CONCLUSION: We found that primary care physicians attribute the low rates of preventive cancer screening among LEP populations to a variety of patient, provider, interpreter, and system factors, most of which go beyond simple language barriers. Interventions designed to reduce these barriers and enhance the impact of identified facilitators should be multifactorial and designed to engage primary care physicians.
Entities:
Keywords:
Limited English proficiency; cancer screening; disparities; qualitative research
Authors: Gwerfyl Wyn Roberts; Fiona Elizabeth Irvine; Peter Reece Jones; Llinos Haf Spencer; Colin Ronald Baker; Cen Williams Journal: Int J Nurs Stud Date: 2006-10-19 Impact factor: 5.837
Authors: María E Fernández; Alicia Gonzales; Guillermo Tortolero-Luna; Janet Williams; Monica Saavedra-Embesi; Wenyaw Chan; Sally W Vernon Journal: Am J Public Health Date: 2009-03-19 Impact factor: 9.308
Authors: Luisa Watts; Naima Joseph; Amanda Velazquez; Marisa Gonzalez; Elizabeth Munro; Alona Muzikansky; Jose A Rauh-Hain; Marcela G Del Carmen Journal: Am J Obstet Gynecol Date: 2009-08 Impact factor: 8.661
Authors: James C Hill; Jane W Njeru; Mark L Wieland; Lila J Rutten; Debra J Jacobson; Gregory D Jenkins; Chun Fan Journal: J Immigr Minor Health Date: 2021-05-15