| Literature DB >> 27499664 |
Hyeong Sang Kim1, Koo Bok Chin1.
Abstract
This study was performed to evaluate the antioxidant activity of oven-dried tomato powder (OTP) as affected by drying temperature and the effect of OTP on the product quality of pork patties. Three OTP products were obtained by drying of fresh tomato at 60, 80 and 100℃ oven until constant weight was obtained. Total phenolic content of three kinds of OTPs ranged from 1.95 to 5.94 g/100 g. The highest amount of total phenolic compound was observed in OTP dried at 100℃. Antioxidant activity of three kinds of OTPs was measured by 1,1-diphenyl-2-pycrylhydrazyl (DPPH)-radical scavenging activity, iron chelating ability, reducing power and measurement of lipid peroxide in linoleic acid emulsion system. In all parameters, OTP at 100℃ showed the higher antioxidant activity than other temperatures (p<0.05). Based on the model study, the physicochemical properties, and antioxidant and antimicrobial activities of pork patties containing 1% OTP were measured. Redness of pork patties were increased with the addition of OTPs (p<0.05). Thiobarbituric acid reactive substances (TBARS) values of raw pork patties containing OTPs were lower than those of control (CTL) until 7 d of storage, regardless of drying temperatures (p<0.05). Peroxide values of pork patties made with OTP (1%) were lower than those of CTL until the end of storage time (p<0.05). However, no antimicrobial activities were observed among the treatments (p>0.05). Therefore, OTPs could be used as a natural antioxidant in meat products.Entities:
Keywords: Tomato powder; antioxidant activity; drying temperature; pork patty
Year: 2016 PMID: 27499664 PMCID: PMC4973938 DOI: 10.5851/kosfa.2016.36.1.51
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Korean J Food Sci Anim Resour ISSN: 1225-8563 Impact factor: 2.622
Formulation of pork patties with various tomato powders
| Ingredients (%) | Treatments1) | ||||
| CTL | REF | T60 | T80 | T100 | |
| Raw meat | 78.5 | 78.5 | 78.5 | 78.5 | 78.5 |
| Fat | 20.0 | 20.0 | 20.0 | 20.0 | 20.0 |
| Salt | 1.5 | 1.5 | 1.5 | 1.5 | 1.5 |
| AA | - | 0.1 | - | - | - |
| OTP dried at 60℃ | - | - | 1.0 | - | - |
| OTP dried at 80℃ | - | - | - | 1.0 | - |
| OTP dried at 100℃ | - | - | - | - | 1.0 |
| Total | 100.0 | 100.1 | 101.0 | 101.0 | 101.0 |
AA= ascorbic acid; OTP= oven-dried tomato powder.
1)Treatments: Control= patty without tomato extract; REF= patty containing 0.1% of AA; T60, T80 and T100= patties containing 1% of OTP dried at 60, 80 and 100℃, respectively.
Content (g/100 g) of total phenolic compound from OTP as affected by different drying temperatures
| Treatments1) | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| T60 | T80 | T100 | ||
| Total phenolic contents | Mean | 1.95c | 3.59b | 5.94a |
| (g/100 g dry matter) | SD | 0.05 | 0.04 | 0.06 |
a-cMeans with different superscripts in the same row are different (p<0.05).
1)Treatments: T60= OTP dried at 60℃; T80= OTP dried at 80℃; T100= OTP dried at 100℃.
Antioxidant activities of tomato powder as affected by different drying temperatures
| Parameters | Treatments1) | Concentration (%) | |||
| 0.1 | 0.25 | 0.5 | 1.0 | ||
| DPPH radical scavenging activity (%) | AA | 93.9aA | 93.5aA | 93.9aA | 94.4aA |
| T60 | 15.6aB | 17.9aB | 19.4aB | 22.9aC | |
| T80 | 23.4aB | 26.5aB | 27.6aB | 35.4aBC | |
| T100 | 23.1cB | 27.4bcB | 34.3bB | 52.3aB | |
| Iron chelating activity (%) | EDTA | 99.4aA | 99.6aA | 99.7aA | 99.8aA |
| T60 | 16.5bC | 18.1bD | 26.9abC | 39.1aC | |
| T80 | 14.6cdC | 23.6bcC | 35.7abC | 51.7aBC | |
| T100 | 36.2cB | 46.0bcB | 58.4bB | 77.3aAB | |
| Reducing Power (O.D) | AA | 1.62dA | 1.91cA | 2.13bA | 2.22aA |
| T60 | 0.58dD | 0.93cD | 1.43bC | 1.69aC | |
| T80 | 0.82cC | 1.37bC | 1.70aB | 1.74aBC | |
| T100 | 1.02cB | 1.62bB | 1.71aB | 1.76aB | |
a-dMeans with different superscripts in the same row are different (p<0.05).
A-DMeans with different superscripts in the same column are different (p<0.05).
1)Treatments: AA= L-ascorbic acid; T60= OTP at 60℃ oven; T80= OTP at 80℃ oven; T100= OTP at 100℃ oven; EDTA = Ethylendiaminetetraacetic acid.
Fig. 1.Antioxidant activity of OTP as affected by different drying temperatures in linoleic acid emulsion. A-DMeans with having different superscripts within the same time are different (p<0.05). CTL = control; REF = reference (BHT 0.01%); T60-01 = 0.1% of OTP at 60℃; T60-0.5 = 0.5% of OTP at 60℃; T80-0.1 = 0.1% of OTP at 80℃; T80-0.5 = 0.5% of OTP at 80℃; T100-0.1 = 0.1% of OTP at 100℃; T100-0.5 = 0.5% of OTP at 100℃.
Changes of pH, Hunter color values, VBN and microbial counts of raw pork patties with OTP powders during storage at 4℃ for 14 d
| Parameters1) | |||||||
| pH | Hunter L | Hunter a | Hunter b | VBN | TPC | VRB | |
| Treatment2) | |||||||
| CTL | 5.82a | 55.2ab | 8.55b | 8.17b | 12.7a | 4.14a | 3.81a |
| REF | 5.85a | 54.1ab | 9.82ab | 8.04b | 11.2b | 4.33a | 3.78a |
| T60 | 5.62b | 57.4a | 11.4a | 10.9ab | 11.5b | 4.30a | 3.61a |
| T80 | 5.70b | 53.2b | 12.2a | 12.3a | 11.2b | 4.39a | 3.70a |
| T100 | 5.63b | 49.4c | 10.8ab | 12.1a | 11.4b | 4.17a | 3.78a |
| Storage day | |||||||
| 0 | 5.64c | 52.3bc | 14.1a | 10.4a | 10.6b | 2.30d | <2d |
| 3 | 5.65bc | 51.8c | 12.6a | 12.2a | 10.7b | 2.45d | <2d |
| 7 | 5.69bc | 54.1abc | 10.1b | 9.76a | 11.2b | 3.78c | 3.01c |
| 10 | 5.74b | 55.7ab | 7.85b | 9.17a | 12.3a | 6.06b | 5.55b |
| 14 | 5.91a | 55.9a | 8.14b | 9.98a | 13.3a | 6.75a | 6.13a |
a-cMeans with different superscripts in the same column (treatment) are different (p<0.05).
a-dMeans with different superscripts in the same column (storage day) are different (p<0.05).
1)Hunter L = lightness; Hunter a = redness; Hunter b = yellowness; VBN = volatile basic nitrogen (mg%); TPC = total bacterial counts (Log CFU/g); VRB = Enterobacteriaceae counts (Log CFU/g).
2)Treatment: Control= patty without tomato extract; REF= patty containing 0.1% of AA; T60, T80 and T100= patties containing 1% of OTP dried at 60, 80 and 100℃, respectively.
Fig. 2.TBARS of pork patties with various OTP as affected by different drying temperatures. A-CMeans with having different superscripts within the same storage days are different (p<0.05).
Fig. 3.POV of pork patties with three OTPs as affected by different drying temperatures. A-CMeans with having different superscripts within the same storage days are different (p<0.05).