Justin C Strickland1, Mark A Smith2. 1. Department of Psychology, University of Kentucky, Lexington, KY, USA. 2. Department of Psychology, Davidson College, Davidson, NC, USA; Program in Neuroscience, Davidson College, Davidson, NC, USA. Electronic address: masmith@davidson.edu.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Numerous studies have demonstrated that participation in regular resistance exercise (e.g., strength training) is associated with improvements in mental health, memory, and cognition. However, less is known about the neurobiological mechanisms mediating these effects. The goal of this mini-review is to describe and evaluate the available animal models of resistance exercise that may prove useful for examining CNS activity. NEW METHOD: Various models have been developed to examine resistance exercise in laboratory animals. COMPARISON WITH EXISTING METHODS: Resistance exercise models vary in how the resistance manipulation is applied, either through direct stimulation of the muscle (e.g., in situ models) or through behavior maintained by operant contingencies (e.g., whole organism models). Each model presents distinct advantages and disadvantages for examining central nervous system (CNS) activity, and consideration of these attributes is essential for the future investigation of underlying neurobiological substrates. RESULTS: Potential neurobiological mechanisms mediating the effects of resistance exercise on pain, anxiety, memory, and drug use have been efficiently and effectively investigated using resistance exercise models that minimize stress and maximize the relative contribution of resistance over aerobic factors. CONCLUSIONS: Whole organism resistance exercise models that (1) limit the use of potentially stressful stimuli and (2) minimize the contribution of aerobic factors will be critical for examining resistance exercise and CNS function.
BACKGROUND: Numerous studies have demonstrated that participation in regular resistance exercise (e.g., strength training) is associated with improvements in mental health, memory, and cognition. However, less is known about the neurobiological mechanisms mediating these effects. The goal of this mini-review is to describe and evaluate the available animal models of resistance exercise that may prove useful for examining CNS activity. NEW METHOD: Various models have been developed to examine resistance exercise in laboratory animals. COMPARISON WITH EXISTING METHODS: Resistance exercise models vary in how the resistance manipulation is applied, either through direct stimulation of the muscle (e.g., in situ models) or through behavior maintained by operant contingencies (e.g., whole organism models). Each model presents distinct advantages and disadvantages for examining central nervous system (CNS) activity, and consideration of these attributes is essential for the future investigation of underlying neurobiological substrates. RESULTS: Potential neurobiological mechanisms mediating the effects of resistance exercise on pain, anxiety, memory, and drug use have been efficiently and effectively investigated using resistance exercise models that minimize stress and maximize the relative contribution of resistance over aerobic factors. CONCLUSIONS: Whole organism resistance exercise models that (1) limit the use of potentially stressful stimuli and (2) minimize the contribution of aerobic factors will be critical for examining resistance exercise and CNS function.
Authors: Larissa C R Silveira; Geisa C S V Tezini; Débora S Schujmann; Jaqueline M Porto; Bruno R O Rossi; Hugo C D Souza Journal: Auton Neurosci Date: 2011-03-22 Impact factor: 3.145
Authors: Mark A Smith; Gaylen E Fronk; Jean M Abel; Ryan T Lacy; Sarah E Bills; Wendy J Lynch Journal: Psychopharmacology (Berl) Date: 2018-02-02 Impact factor: 4.530
Authors: Juha P Ahtiainen; Sanna Lensu; Ilona Ruotsalainen; Moritz Schumann; Johanna K Ihalainen; Vasco Fachada; Christopher L Mendias; Matthew S Brook; Kenneth Smith; Philip J Atherton; Lauren G Koch; Steven L Britton; Heikki Kainulainen Journal: Exp Physiol Date: 2018-10-09 Impact factor: 2.969
Authors: Natalie de Almeida Barros; Felipe J Aidar; Anderson Carlos Marçal; Jymmys L Santos; Raphael Fabricio de Souza; Jainara Lima Menezes; Margarete Zanardo Gomes; Dihogo Gama de Matos; Eduardo Borba Neves; André Luiz Gomes Carneiro; Paulo Francisco de Almeida-Neto; Breno Guilherme de Araújo Tinoco Cabral; Reinaldo Viana Belo Neto; Beat Knechtle; Filipe Manuel Clemente; Enilton Aparecido Camargo Journal: Biology (Basel) Date: 2021-12-27