Literature DB >> 27497679

Early life growth, socioeconomic status, and mammographic breast density in an urban US birth cohort.

Tomi F Akinyemiju1, Parisa Tehranifar2, Julie D Flom3, Yuyan Liao3, Ying Wei4, Mary Beth Terry5.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: Rapid infant and childhood growth has been associated with chronic disease later in life, including breast cancer. Early life socioeconomic status (SES) influences childhood growth, but few studies have prospective measures from birth to consider the effects of early life growth and SES on breast cancer risk.
METHODS: We used prospectively measured early life SES and growth (percentile weight change in height and weight between each pair of consecutive time points at birth, 4 months, 1 and 7 years). We performed linear regression models to obtain standardized estimates of the association between 1 standard deviation increase in early life SES and growth and adult mammographic density (MD), a strong risk factor for breast cancer, in a diverse birth cohort (n = 151; 37% white, 38% black, 25% Puerto Rican; average age at mammogram = 42.4).
RESULTS: In models adjusted for race/ethnicity, prenatal factors, birthweight, infant and childhood growth, and adult body mass index, percentile weight change from 1 year to 7 years was inversely associated with percent MD (standardized coefficient (Stdβ) = -0.28, 95% CI: -0.55 to -0.01), and higher early life SES was positively associated with percent MD (Stdβ = 0.24, 95% CI: 0.04-0.43). Similar associations were observed for dense area, but those estimates were not statistically significant.
CONCLUSIONS: These results suggest opposite and independent effects of early life SES and growth on MD.
Copyright © 2016 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  BMI; Birthweight; Childhood body size; Life course; Mammographic density; Socioeconomic status

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27497679      PMCID: PMC5506550          DOI: 10.1016/j.annepidem.2016.06.011

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Epidemiol        ISSN: 1047-2797            Impact factor:   3.797


  6 in total

1.  Lifecourse socioeconomic status and cancer-related risk factors: Analysis of the WHO study on global ageing and adult health (SAGE).

Authors:  Tomi Akinyemiju; Kemi Ogunsina; Michelle Okwali; Swati Sakhuja; Dejana Braithwaite
Journal:  Int J Cancer       Date:  2016-11-18       Impact factor: 7.396

2.  Prepubertal and Pubertal Endocrine-Disrupting Chemical Exposure and Breast Density among Chilean Adolescents.

Authors:  Alexandra M Binder; Camila Corvalan; Ana Pereira; Antonia M Calafat; Xiaoyun Ye; John Shepherd; Karin B Michels
Journal:  Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev       Date:  2018-08-29       Impact factor: 4.254

3.  Childhood body size and midlife mammographic breast density in foreign-born and U.S.-born women in New York City.

Authors:  Shweta Athilat; Cynthia Joe; Carmen B Rodriguez; Mary Beth Terry; Parisa Tehranifar
Journal:  Ann Epidemiol       Date:  2018-08-18       Impact factor: 3.797

4.  Do Birth Weight and Weight Gain During Infancy and Early Childhood Explain Variation in Mammographic Density in Women in Midlife? Results From Cohort and Sibling Analyses.

Authors:  Mary Beth Terry; Barbara A Cohn; Mandy Goldberg; Julie D Flom; Ying Wei; Lauren C Houghton; Parisa Tehranifar; Jasmine A McDonald; Angeline Protacio; Piera Cirillo; Karin B Michels
Journal:  Am J Epidemiol       Date:  2019-02-01       Impact factor: 4.897

5.  Early life socioeconomic environment and mammographic breast density.

Authors:  Parisa Tehranifar; Barbara A Cohn; Julie D Flom; Angeline Protacio; Piera Cirillo; L H Lumey; Karin B Michels; Mary Beth Terry
Journal:  BMC Cancer       Date:  2017-01-10       Impact factor: 4.430

Review 6.  The epidemiologic factors associated with breast density: A review.

Authors:  Dong-Man Ye; Tao Yu
Journal:  J Res Med Sci       Date:  2022-07-29       Impact factor: 1.985

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.